Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:23:59.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Are Federal Arrangements not a Panacea for Containing Ethnic Nationalism? Lessons from the Post-Soviet Russian Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

OKTAY F. TANRISEVER
OKTAY F. TANRISEVER*
Affiliation:
Department of International Relations, Middle East Technical University, Ankara-Turkey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Federal arrangements have been considered by some thinkers as a panacea for containing ethnic nationalism in the ethnically defined regions. This article challenges this view by arguing that federal institutions may enable ethnic nationalists in the ethnically defined regions to consolidate their power through the guarantees that they receive from the federal centre. Although the post-Soviet Russian leadership under Boris Yeltsin sought to use federalism as a tool for containing ethnic nationalism, Russia's this experiment with federalism demonstrates that federalism may serve not to contain but to strengthen ethnic nationalism. Disillusioned with Yeltsin's failed use of federalism in containing ethnic nationalism, the overwhelming majority of the Russian people supported Vladimir Putin's anti-federalist reforms since 2000 which made federalism redundant in Russia. While undermining the basis for Western style democracy in Russia, Putin's centralism proved to be more effective than Yeltsin's federalism in containing ethnic nationalism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , December 2009 , pp. 333 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balzer, Marjorie Mandelstam (1994), ‘From Ethnicity to Nationalism: Turmoil in the Russian Mini Empire’, in Millar, James R. and Wolchik, Sharon L. (eds.), Social Legacy of Communism, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 56–88.Google Scholar
Barsenkov, Aleksandr et al. (eds.) (1993), Towards a Nationality Policy in the Russian Federation, Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen Press.Google Scholar
Beliaev, S. A. (1998), ‘The Problems of Federalism in the Former Soviet Union’, Federalist, 11 (1): 56–71.Google Scholar
Boase, Joan Price (1994), ‘Faces of Asymmetry: German and Canadian Federalism’, in DeVilliers, Bertus (ed.), Evaluating Federal Systems, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Breuilly, John (1993), Nationalism and the State, 2nd edn, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, David (2007), ‘Regionalist Federalism: A Critique of Ethno-national Federalism’, in He, Baogan, Galligan, Brian, and Inoguchi, Takashi (eds.), Federalism in Asia, Cheltentham: Edward Elgar, pp. 57–81.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers (1992), Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Craig (1994), ‘Social Theory and the Politics of Identity’, in Calhoun, Craig (ed.), Social Theory and the Politics of Identity, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
Connor, Walter (1994), Ethnonationalism: The Quest for Understanding, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Ramsay (1986), Canada, Quebec, and the Uses of Nationalism, Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W. (1963), ‘Some Problems in the Study of Nation-Building’, in Deutsch, Karl W. and Foltz, William J. (eds.), Nation-Building, New York: Atherton Press, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Elazar, Daniel J. (1987), Exploring Federalism, Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Elazar, Daniel J. (1993), ‘International and Comparative Federalism’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 24 (2): 190–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Federativnyi Dogovor’ (1992), Etnopoliticheskii Vestnik Rossii (1): 17–32.Google Scholar
Filippov, M. and Shvetsova, O. (1999), ‘Asymmetric Bilateral Bargaining in the New Russian Federation – A Path-Dependence Explanation’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 32 (1): 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, Murray (1981), Unions of States, New York: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Fry, Earl H. (1988), ‘Subnational Federal Units in an Age of Complex Interdependence: Implications for the International System’, in Brown, John C. L. (ed.), Centralizing and De-centralizing Trends in Federal States, Langham: University of Arizona Press, pp. 75–88.Google Scholar
Gorenburg, Daniel S. (1999), ‘Regional Separatism in Russia: Ethnic Mobilisation or Power Grab?’, Europe–Asia Studies, 51 (2): 245–74.Google Scholar
Greenfeld, Liah (1992), Nationalism: Five Roads to Modernity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Guboglo, Mikhail N. (1997), ‘Federalizm vlasti i vlast’ federalizma’, in Arinin, Aleksandr and Guboglo, Mikhail N. (eds.), Federalizm vlasti i vlast’ federalizma, Moscow: Inteltekh, pp. 101–148.Google Scholar
Guboglo, Mikhail (1998), ‘The Russian Federation Needs a New Nationalities Policy’, Jamestown Foundation Prism, 1 (1) (5 May).Google Scholar
He, Baogang (2007), ‘Democratization and Federalization in Asia’, in He, Baogan, Galligan, Brian and Inoguchi, Takashi (eds.), Federalism in Asia, Cheltentham: Edward Elgar, pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Baogan, Galligan, Brian and Inoguchi, Takashi (eds.) (2007), Federalism in Asia, Cheltentham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. (2007), ‘The Many Uses of Federalism’, Drake Law Review, 55 (4): 953–66.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, John and Smith, Anthony D. (1996), ‘Introduction’, in Hutchinson, John and Smith, Anthony D. (eds.), Ethnicity: A Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
Iivonen, Jyrki (1995), ‘Expansionism and the Russian Imperial Tradition’, in Forsberg, Thomas (ed.), Contested Territory: Border Disputes at the Edge of the Former Soviet Empire, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 62–3.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi (2007), ‘Federal Traditions and Quasi-federalism in Japan’, in He, Baogan, Galligan, Brian, and Inoguchi, Takashi (eds.), Federalism in Asia, Cheltentham: Edward Elgar, pp. 266–89.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vladimir V. (1997), Rossiiskii federalizm i vnutri-gosudarstvennaia dogovornaia politika, Krasnoyarsk: Izd-vo KGU.Google Scholar
Kimenyi, Mwangi S. (1998), ‘Harmonizing Ethnic Claims in Africa: A Proposal for Ethnic-Based Federalism’, Cato Journal, 18 (1): 43–64.Google Scholar
King, Peter (1982), Federalism and Federation, London: Croom Helm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkow, Peter (1998), Russia's Provinces: Authoritarian Transformation versus Local Autonomy?, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kistanov, Viktor (2000), Federal'nye okruga Rossii: Vazhnyi shag v ukreplenii gosudarstva, Moscow: Ekonomika.Google Scholar
Konstitutsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii (1993), Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura.Google Scholar
Leff, Carol Skalnik (1999), ‘Democratization and Disintegration in Multinational States: The Breakup of the Communist Federations’, World Politics, 51 (2): 205–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luchterhandt, Galina (1995), ‘The Russian Province Before and After Constitutional Reform’, RFE/RL. Research Report, 3 (3): 32–39.Google Scholar
Luong, Pauline J. (1998), ‘Tatarstan: Elite Bargaining and Ethnic Separatism’, in Colton, Timothy J. and Hough, Jerry F. (eds.), Growing Pains: Russian Democracy and the Election of 1993, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Madison, James, Hamilton, Alexander and Jay, John (1999), The Federalist Papers, Kesler, Charles R. and Rossiter, Clinton (eds.), New York: Mentor.Google Scholar
Matsuzato, Kimitaka (2001), ‘From Ethno-Bonapartism to Centralized Caciquismo: Characteristics and Origins of the Tatarstan Political Regime, 1900–2000’, The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 17 (4): 43–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mawhood, Philip (1984), ‘The Politics of Survival: Federal States in the Third World’, International Political Science Review, 5 (4): 521–31.Google Scholar
Mendras, Mari (1997), ‘Asimmetriia ili mnogoobrazie’, in Zakharov, Andrei A. (ed.), Asimmetrichnost’ federatsii, Moscow: Tacis.Google Scholar
Montinola, Gabriella, Qian, Yingyi, and Weingast, Barry R. (1995), ‘Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success in China’, World Politics, 48 (1): 50–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezavisimaia gazeta, 24 March 2000.Google Scholar
Orttung, Robert and Reddaway, Peter (2001), ‘Russian State-Building: The Regional Dimension’, The Russia Initiative, Carnegie Corporation of New York.Google Scholar
Peeters, Patrick (1994), ‘Federalism: A Comparative Perspective – Belgium Transforms from a Unitary to a Federal State’, in DeVilliers, Bertus (ed.), Evaluating Federal Systems, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Petrov, Nikolai (1998), ‘The President's Representatives: “Moscow's Men” in the Regions’, Jamestown Foundation Prism, 4 (7) (3 April).Google Scholar
Polishchuk, L. (1998), ‘The Russian Model of “Negotiated Federalism” – (Political– Economic Analysis)’, Problems of Economic Transition, 41 (7–8): 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popovski, Vesna (1995), ‘Yugoslavia: Politics, Federation, Nation’, in Smith, Graham (ed.), Federalism: The Multi-Ethnic Challenge, London: Longman, pp. 180–207.Google Scholar
Reid, Anthony (2007), ‘Indonesia's Post-revolutionary Aversion to Federalism’, in He, Baogan, Galligan, Brian, and Inoguchi, Takashi (eds.), Federalism in Asia, Cheltentham: Edward Elgar, pp. 144–64.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. (1975), ‘Federalism’, in Greenstein, Fred and Polsby, Nelson W. (eds.), Handbook of Political Science: Governmental Institutions and Processes, Reading: Addison-Wesley, pp. 93–172.Google Scholar
Rossiia, 19–25 January 1994, p. 3.Google Scholar
Rossiiskaia gazeta, 16 June 1997.Google Scholar
Rossiiskaia gazeta, 16 May 2000.Google Scholar
Rossiiskie vesti, 1 June 1996.Google Scholar
Sarycheva, I. A. (1997), ‘Raspolzanie pravavoi sistemy – ugroza konstitutsionnoi bezopastnosti Rossii’, Federalizm, 2 (4): 121–42.Google Scholar
Sbornik dogovorov i soglashenii mezhdu organami gosudarstvennoi vlasti sub'ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii o razgranichenii predmetov vedeniia i polnomochii (1997), Moscow: Izdanie Gosudarstvennoi Dumy.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, Robert K. (1998), ‘Separatism: Rationality and Irony’, in Spencer, Metta (ed.), Separatism: Democracy and Disintegration, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 43–68.Google Scholar
Shlapentokh, Vladimir, Levita, Roman, and Loiberg, Mikhail (1997), From Submission to Rebellion: The Provinces versus the Center in Russia, Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Shumeiko, Vladimir F. (1996), Rossiiskie reformy i federalizm, Moscow: Slavianskii dialog.Google Scholar
Slider, Darrell (2008), ‘Russian Federalism: Can It Be Rebuilt from the Ruins?’, Russian Analytical Digest (43) (17 June).Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. (1991), National Identity, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Solnick, Steven (1995), ‘Torg Mezhdu Moskvoi i sub”ektami federatsii o strukture novogo rossiiskogo gosudarstva: 1990–1995’, Polis, 5 (6): 95–108.Google Scholar
Tadevosian, Eduard V. (1997), ‘O modelirovanii v teorii federalizma i probleme asimetrichnykh federatsii’, Gosudarstvo i pravo (8): 58–68.Google Scholar
Teague, Elizabeth (1994), ‘Russia and Tatarstan Sign Power-Sharing Treaty’, RFE/RL Research Report, 3 (14): 19–27.Google Scholar
Teague, Elizabeth (1996), ‘Russia and the Regions: The Uses of Ambiguity’, in Gibson, John and Hanson, Philip (eds.), Transformation from Below: Local Power and the Political Economy of Post-Communist Transitions, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 13–36.Google Scholar
Tismaneanu, Vladimir and Turner, Michael (1995), ‘Understanding Post-Sovietism: Between Residual Leninism and Uncertain Pluralism’, in Political Culture and Civil Society in Russia and the New States of Eurasia, Tismaneanu, Vladimir (ed.), New York: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel (1997), ‘Russia's “Ethnic Revival”: the Separatist Activism of Regional Leaders in a Postcommunist Order’, World Politics, 49 (2): 212–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turovskii, R. (1998), ‘Khronika odnoi kontrrevoliutsii: otnosheniia “tsentr-regiony” v 1997–98 gg.’, Politicheskie protsessy v regionakh Rossii, Moscow: Tsentr politicheskikh teknologii, pp. 11–61.Google Scholar
Vaubel, R. (1996), ‘Constitutional Safeguards against Centralization in Federal States: An International Cross-Section Analysis’, Constitutional Political Economy, 7 (2): 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Lee (1996), ‘Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in the Post-Soviet Transition’, in Drobizheva, Leokadia M. et al. (eds.), Ethnic Conflict in the Post-Soviet World: Case Studies and Analysis, New York: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
Warhola, James W. (1996), Politicized Ethnicity in the Russian Federation: Dilemmas of State Formation, New York: Edwin Mullen.Google Scholar
Wolchik, Sharon L. (1996), ‘The Politics of Ethnicity and the Break-up of the Czechoslovak Federation’, in Drobizheva, Leokadia M. et al. (eds.), Ethnic Conflict in the Post-Soviet World, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 67–85.Google Scholar
Zlotnik, Marc (1996), ‘Russia's Elected Governors: All the President's Men?’, Problems of Post-Communism (6): 26–34.Google Scholar