Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:59:56.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postmodern Values in Seven Confucian Societies: Political Consequences of Changing World Views

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

ZHENGXU WANG
ZHENGXU WANG*
Affiliation:
National University of [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Economic development and the social changes it brings are changing people's world views among the East Asia Confucian societies. Most notable is a change from stressing hard work and achievement toward stressing enjoyment, self expression, and a fulfilling lifestyle. With this people also have become more pro-equality and tolerant toward different ideas and styles. These newly emerged views of modernized societies can be called ‘postmodern’ values. People with stronger postmodern values are more active politically, more assertive in demanding individual and political rights, and more emphatic in their preference for democratic government. The implication is that people in East Asia will demand more democracy as economic development proceeds and as they acquire these postmodern values.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , December 2007 , pp. 341 - 359
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gregory A. and Verba, Sidney (1963), The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Daniel (1960), The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel (1976), The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting, New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondel, Jean and Inoguchi, Takashi (2006), Political Culture in Asia and Europe, London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catterberg, Gabriela (2002), ‘Transitions to Democracy: The Post-Honeymoon Decline of Participation’, Unpublished Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. (2006), ‘Social Modernization and the End of Ideology Debate: Patterns of Ideological Polarization’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 7: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. and Ong, Nhu-Ngoc T. (2005), ‘Authority Orientations and Democratic Attitudes: A Test of the “Asian Values” Hypothesis’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 6: 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. and van Sickle, Alix (2005), ‘Who Protests? The Sources of Protest’, Paper presented at the annual meetings of the International Studies Association, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry (1993), Political Culture and Democracy in Developing Countries, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, Scott C. (1982), ‘Changing Values in Advanced Industrial Societies: Inglehart's Silent Revolution from the Perspective of Japanese Findings’, Comparative Political Studies, 14 (4): 403–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, Scott C. and Lee, Aie-Rie (2000), ‘Value Change and Democratic Reform in Japan and Korea’, Comparative Political Studies, 33 (5): 626–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, Scott C. and Lee, Aie-Rie (2003), ‘The New Politics, Culture Wars, And the Authoritarian-Libertarian Value Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 36 (3): 235–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. (1996), Putting up with Fellow Russians: Political Tolerance in a Fledging Democracy, Studies in Public Policy, Glasgow, Scotland: Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
Heath, Anthony, Fisher, Stephen, and Smith, Shawna (2005), ‘The Globalization of Public Opinion Research’, Annual Review of Political Science, 8: 297–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ike, Nobutaka (1973), ‘Economic Growth and Intergenerational Change in Japan’, The American Political Science Review, 67 (4): 1194–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (1971), ‘The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies’, American Political Science Review 65: 991–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (1977), The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (1990), Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (1997), Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (1988) ‘The Renaissance of Political Culture’, The American Political Science Review, 82 (4): 1203–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Baker, Wayen E. (2000), ‘Modernization, Culture Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values’, American Sociological Review, 65: 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Norris, Pippa (2003), Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Welzel, Christian (2005), Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inkeles, Alex and Smith, David H. (1974), Becoming Modern: Individual Change in Six Developing Countries, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotze, Hennie and Lombard, Karin (2003), ‘Revising the Value Shift Hypothesis: A Descriptive Analysis of South Africa's Value Priorities between 1990 and 2001’, in Inglehart, Ronald (ed.), Human Values and Social Change: Findings from the Values Surveys, Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, pp. 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. (1960), Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Maslow, Abraham (1943), ‘A Theory of Human Motivation’, Psychological Review, 50: 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevitte, Neil (1996), The Decline of Deference: Canadian Value Change in CrossCultural Perspective, Peterborough, ON: Canada Broadview Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa (1999), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard and Mishler, William (1996), ‘Testing the Churchill Hypothesis: Popular Support for Democracy and Its Alternatives’, Journal of Public Policy, 16: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard and Shin, Doh C. (2001), ‘Democratization Backwards: The Problem of Third-Wave Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 31: 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Doh C. (2007), ‘Democratization: Perspectives from Global Citizenries’, in Dalton, Russell and Klingeman, Hans-Dieter (eds), Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
United Nations (2006), ‘Human Development Report, 2006’, available online at http://hdr.undp.org/hdr2006/statistics/ (accessed 2 March 2007).Google Scholar
Wang, Zhengxu (2005), ‘Changing Social Values and Democratization in China and East Asia: The Self-Expression Phenomenon and Citizen Politics in Six Confucian Societies, 1981–2001’, unpublished dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Welzel, Christian, Inglehart, Ronald, and Deutsch, Franziska (2005), ‘Social Capital, Voluntary Associations and Collective Action: Which Aspects of Social Capital Have the Greatest ‘Civic’ Payoff?’ Journal of Civil Society, 1 (2): 121–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welzel, Christian, Inglehart, Ronald, and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (2003), ‘The Theory of Human Development: A Cross-Cultural Analysis’, European Journal of Political Research, 42 (2): 341–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar