Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:16:50.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing Political Trust in Hong Kong and Taiwan: Levels, Determinants, and Implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2009

TIMOTHY KA-YING WONG ,
HSIN-HUANG MICHAEL HSIAO  and
PO-SAN WAN
TIMOTHY KA-YING WONG
Affiliation:
Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, Chinese University of Hong [email protected]
HSIN-HUANG MICHAEL HSIAO
Affiliation:
Center for Asia-Pacific Area Studies, Academia Sinica and National Taiwan University
PO-SAN WAN
Affiliation:
Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, Chinese University of Hong Kong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Political trust is a cornerstone of political survival and development. This paper makes use of data from the 2006 AsiaBarometer Survey to examine the level of political trust in Hong Kong and Taiwan. It finds that the people of Hong Kong have a high level of trust in their government and judiciary, but a relatively low level of trust in their legislature. In contrast, the Taiwan people have a lower level of trust in all of their executive, judicial, and legislative branches, reflecting a serious problem with political confidence in Taiwan. A further analysis shows that institutional factors such as ratings of government performance, life satisfaction, and satisfaction with democratic rights and freedoms, and cultural factors such as interpersonal trust, post-materialism, and traditionalism have varying degrees of effect on the different domains of political trust in Hong Kong and Taiwan, but institutional factors appear to be more powerful than cultural factors in explaining the experiences of both societies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , August 2009 , pp. 147 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney (1965), The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, An Analytic Study, Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Badie, Bertrand and Birnbaum, Pierre (1983), The Sociology of the State, translated by Goldhammer, ArthurChicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chanley, Virginia A. (2002), ‘Trust in Government in the Aftermath of 9/11: Determinants and Consequences’, Political Psychology, 23 (3): 469–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Jie, Zhong, Yang, Hillard, Jan and Scheb, John (1997), ‘Assessing Political Support in China: Citizens’ Evaluations of Governmental Effectiveness and Legitimacy’, Journal of Contemporary China, 6 (16): 551–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Tom and Lægreid, Per (2005), ‘Trust in Government: The Relative Importance of Service Satisfaction, Political Factors, and Demography’, Public Performance and Management Review, 28 (4): 487–511.Google Scholar
Easton, David (1975), ‘A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support’, British Journal of Political Science, 5 (4): 435–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William A. (1968), Power and Discontent, Homewood: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A. and Spence, Lester Kenyatta (2005), ‘Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment’, Political Research Quarterly, 58 (2): 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. (1998), ‘The Political Relevance of Political Trust’, American Political Science Review, 92 (4): 791–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. (2005), Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth (2001), ‘Process Preferences and American Politics: What the People Want Government to Be’, American Political Science Review, 95 (1): 145–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, Hsin-Huang Michael and Wan, Po-san (2004), ‘The Emergence of “Postmaterialism”? A Comparison of Taipei and Hong Kong’, in Lau, Siu-kai, Wong, Timothy Ka-ying and Wan, Po-san (eds.), Society and Politics in Hong Kong: Continuity and Change, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, pp. 243–73 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (1997), Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 41 Societies, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Abramson, Paul R. (1994), ‘Economic Security and Value Change’, American Political Science Review, 88 (2): 336–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuan, Hsin-chi and Lau, Siu-kai (1995), ‘The Partial Vision of Democracy in Hong Kong: A Survey of Popular Opinion’, The China Journal, 34: 239–64.Google Scholar
Lau, Siu-kai (2003), ‘Socio-economic Discontent and Political Attitudes’, in Lau, Siu-kai, Lee, Ming-kwanWan, Po-san and Wong, Siu-lun (eds.), Indicators of Social Development: Hong Kong 2001, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, pp. 29–75.Google Scholar
Ma, Deyong (2007), ‘Institutional and Cultural Factors of Political Trust in Eight Asian Societies’, Comparative Economic and Social Systems, 5: 79–86 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
March, James G. (1988), Decisions and Organizations, New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H. (1974), ‘Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970’, American Political Science Review, 68 (3): 951–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, William and Rose, Richard (2001), ‘What Are the Origins of Political Trust?: Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-communist Societies’, Comparative Political Studies, 34 (1): 30–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Kenneth (2002), ‘Social Trust and Political Disaffection: Social Capital and Democracy’, RUSEL Papers – Civic Series, 3: 70–98.Google Scholar
Newton, Kenneth (2006), ‘Political Support: Social Capital, Civil Society, and Political and Economic Performance’, Paper 06–07, Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California, Irvine. Also available online at http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/06-07/.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa (1999), ‘Introduction: The Growth of Critical Citizens?’, in Norris, Pippa (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, James (1973), The Fiscal Crisis of the State, New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, MichaelAntonio Cheibub, José and Limongi, Fernando (1996), ‘What Makes Democracies Endure?’, Journal of Democracy, 7 (1): 39–55.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. (1995), ‘Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America’, Political Science and Politics, 28 (4): 664–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodee, Carlton C., Anderson, Totton J., Christol, Carl Q. and Greene, Thomas H. (1983), Introduction to Political Science, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Thomas J. and Evans, Jillian (2005), ‘Political Trust, Ideology, and Public Support for Government Spending’, American Journal of Political Science, 49 (3): 660–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, Tianjian (2001), ‘Cultural Values and Political Trust: A Comparison of the People's Republic of China and Taiwan’, Comparative Politics, 33 (4): 401–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. (1962), ‘Popular Evaluations of Government: An Empirical Assessment’, in Cleveland, Harlan and Lasswell, Harold D. (eds.), Ethics and Bigness: Scientific, Academic, Religious, Political, and Military, New York: Harper & Brothers, pp. 61–72.Google Scholar
Wang, Zhengxu (2005), ‘Before the Emergence of Critical Citizens: Economic Development and Political Trust in China’, International Review of Sociology, 15 (1): 155–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Zhengxu, Dalton, Russell J. and Shin, Doh Chull (2006), ‘Political Trust, Political Performance, and Support for Democracy’, in Dalton, Russell J. and Chull Shin, Doh (eds.), Citizens, Democracy, and Markets around the Pacific Rim, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 135–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Timothy Ka-ying and Wan, Po-san (2004), ‘The Practice of “One Country, Two Systems’: A Comparison of the Performance Legitimacy of the SAR and Chinese Governments’, in Lau, Siu-kai, Wong, Timothy Ka-ying and Wan, Po-san (eds.), Society and Politics in Hong Kong: Continuity and Change, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, pp. 193–212 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Wong, Timothy Ka-ying and Wan, Po-san (2007), ‘The China Factor in the Hong Kong Public's Changing Perceptions of “One Country, Two Systems”', Asian Perspective, 31 (2): 127–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Timothy Ka-ying and Wan, Po-san (2008a), Hong Kong Society and Politics in Public Opinion, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Wong, Timothy Ka-ying and Wan, Po-san (2008b), ‘New Evidence of the Postmaterialist Shift: The Experience of Hong Kong’, Social Indicators Research, available online at http://www.springerlink.com/content/272656t7861t9102/.Google Scholar