Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T08:23:51.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global libertarianism: how much public morality does international human rights law allow?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2021

Eric Heinze Open the ORCID record for Eric Heinze [Opens in a new window]
Eric Heinze*
Affiliation:
School of Law, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Eric Heinze, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

International human rights specialists and libertarian philosophers have rarely pursued meaningful exchanges, but this paper probes some of their common ground. In recent years, leading international monitoring bodies have developed a principle described here as the ‘Libertarian Principle of Human Rights’ (LPHR). It runs as follows: Governments cannot legitimately recite public morals as a sufficient justification to limit individual human rights. That principle might seem obvious in many societies today, but throughout history, including the history of liberalism, any notion that certain individual interests must trump religious or customary beliefs has stood as the rare exception. The seemingly Western and secular suggestion of a libertarian principle inherent within human rights may seem at odds with the view that human rights ought to reflect diverse cultural traditions; however, LPHR underscores an anti-authoritarianism, which, it is argued, must form part of any serious conception of human rights. LPHR can be substantiated even for highly controversial rights, such as LGBTQ+ rights, suggesting that it applies a fortiori to more settled rights.

Keywords

International human rightslegal philosophyLGBTQ+ rightslibertarianismpolitical philosophy
Type
Research Article
Information
International Theory , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , November 2022 , pp. 571 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). n.d. LGBT Rights. https://www.aclu.org/issues/lgbt-rights#current (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
An-Na'im, Abdullahi. 1999. “Universality and Human Rights: An Islamic Perspective.” In. Japan and International Law, edited by Ando, 311–25. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
An-Na'im, Abdullahi. 2000. “Islam and Human Rights.” American Society of International Law Proceedings 94: 95–101.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. 2019. “Democracy Versus Libertarianism.” In The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism, edited by Brennan, Jason, Schmidtz, David, and van der Vossen, Bas, 53–67. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baderin, Mashood A. 2005a. “Human Rights and Islamic law: The Myth of Discord.” European Human Rights Law Journal 165–85.Google Scholar
Baderin, Mashood A. 2005b. International Human Rights and Islamic Law. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bantekas, Ilias, and Oette, Lutz. 2016. International Human Rights Law and Practice, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baran, Nicole M., Goldman, Gretchen, and Zelikova, Jane. 2019. “Abortion Bans Based on So-Called ‘Science’ Are Fraudulent.” Scientific American, August 21, 2019, https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/abortion-bans-based-on-so-called-science-are-fraudulent/ (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Blackwood, Evelyn, ed. 1985. Anthropology and Homosexual Behavior. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Blitt, Robert C. 2018. “Leveraging Regional Human Rights Mechanisms Against Universal Human Rights.” William & Mary Law Review Online 60 (1): 1–43.Google Scholar
Boswell, John. 1980. Christianity, Social Tolerance and Homosexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Jason. 2012. Libertarianism: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Jason, Schmidtz, David, and van der Vossen, Bas, eds. 2019. The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bullough, Vern L. 1976. Sexual Variance in Society and History. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
CEDAW [Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women], General Recommendations. n.d. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CEDAW/Pages/Recommendations.aspx (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Christian Concern. 2018. “6 Reasons Christians don't support ‘pride’”. https://www.christianconcern.com/our-issues/same-sex-marriage/6-reasons-christians-dont-support-pride (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Conly, Sarah. 2019. “Paternalism and the Limits of Liberty.” In The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism, edited by Brennan, Jason, Schmidtz, David, and van der Vossen, Bas, 427–35. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
D'Emilio, John. 1983. “Capitalism and Gay Identity.” In Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality, edited by Snitow, A., Stansell, C., and Thompson, S., 100–13. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Devlin, Patrick. 1965 [1958]. The Enforcement of Morals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack, and Whelan, Daniel J.. 2020. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice, 6th rev'd ed, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Douzinas, Costas. 2000. The End of Human Rights Paperback. Oxford: Hart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douzinas, Costas. 2007. Human Rights and Empire: The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit. Democracy Index (annual). http://www.eiu.com/ (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Epple, Carolyn. 1998. “Coming to Terms with Navajo ‘Nádleehí’: A Critique of ‘Berdache,’ ‘Gay,’ ‘Alternate Gender,’ and ‘Two-Spirit’.” American Ethnologist 25 (2): 267–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Forum of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Christian Groups. n.d. https://www.euroforumlgbtchristians.eu/ (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Faiola, Anthony, and Lopes, Marina. 2019. “LGBT rights Threatened in Brazil Under new far-Right President.” The Washington Post, Feb. 18, 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/lgbt-rights-under-attack-in-brazil-under-new-far-right-president/2019/02/17/b24e1dcc-1b28-11e9-b8e6-567190c2fd08_story.html (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Fédération LGBTI. n.d. https://federation-lgbt.org/ (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1976. Histoire de la Sexualité I: La Volonté de Savoir. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Freedman, Rosa. 2013. The United Nations Human Rights Council: A Critique and Early Assessment. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freedom House. n.d. Freedom in the World. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Gerber, Paula, and Gory, Joel. 2014. “The UN Human Rights Committee and LGBT Rights.” Human Rights Law Review 14 (3): 403–40.Google Scholar
Gilabert, Pablo. 2009–2010. “The Importance of Linkage Arguments for the Theory and Practice of Human Rights: A Response to James Nickel.” Human Rights Quarterly 32 (2): 425–38.Google Scholar
Gilden, Andrew. 2007. “Preserving the Seeds of Gender Fluidity: Tribal Courts and the Berdache Tradition.” Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 13: 237–72.Google Scholar
Goel, Ina. 2016. “Hijra Communities of Delhi.” Sexualities 19 (5–6): 535–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, David F. 1988. The Construction of Homosexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, James. 2008. On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1962. Law, Liberty, and Morality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2000 [1949]. Über den Humanismus, 10th ed., Frankfurt, AM: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heinze, Eric. 1995. Sexual Orientation: A Human Right. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Heinze, Eric. 2001. “Sexual Orientation and International Law: A Study in the Manufacture of Cross-Cultural ‘Sensitivity’.” Michigan Journal of International Law 22: 283–309.Google Scholar
Heinze, Eric. 2016. Hate Speech and Democratic Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinze, Eric. 2019. “The Myth of Flexible Universality: Human Rights and the Limits of Comparative Naturalism.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 39 (3): 624–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinze, Eric. 2022. The Most Human Right: Why Free Speech is Everything. Boston: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellum, Anne, ed. 2017. Human Rights, Sexual Orientation, and Gender Identity. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hidayah, . n.d. https://www.hidayahlgbt.co.uk/ (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Huemer, Michael. 2019. “Is Wealth Redistribution A Rights Violation?” In The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism, edited by Brennan, Jason, Schmidtz, David, and van der Vossen, Bas, 259–71. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Human Rights Campaign Fund. n.d. https://www.hrc.org/ (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. n.d. LGBT Rights. https://www.hrw.org/topic/lgbt-rights (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Imaan. n.d. https://imaanlondon.wordpress.com/ (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
International Lesbian and Gay Association. n.d. (a). State-Sponsored Homophobia (annual reports). https://ilga.org/state-sponsored-homophobia-report (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
International Lesbian and Gay Association. n.d. (b). Maps: Sexual Orientation Laws. https://ilga.org/maps-sexual-orientation-laws (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
International Lesbian and Gay Association. n.d. (c). Translegal Mapping Report. https://ilga.org/trans-legal-mapping-report (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon. 2015. “Confucianism, Moral Equality, and Human Rights: A Mencian Perspective.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 74 (1): 149–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, Michael, ed. 2007. The Sexual Self. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Komitid. n.d. https://www.komitid.fr/tag/queer-et-musulman-e/ (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Kreuz & Quer. n.d. https://queer-zh.ch/ (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Lesben- und Schwulenverband in Deutschland. n.d. (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Levy, Jacob T. 2019. “Toward A Non-Lockean Libertarianism.” In The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism, edited by Brennan, Jason, Schmidtz, David, and van der Vossen, Bas, 22–33. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Living Out. n.d. https://www.livingout.org/ (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Machan, Tibor R. 2006. Libertarianism Defended. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Markowitz, Sally. 1990. “Abortion and Feminism.” Social Theory and Practice 16 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maruf. n.d. http://www.maruf.eu/ (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1991 [1859]. On Liberty and Other Essays. Gray, John ed. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Miller, Richard W. 2019. “Learning From Libertarianism.” In The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism, edited by Brennan, Jason, Schmidtz, David and van der Vossen, Bas, 3–21. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1986. “Rights for the Next Generation: A Feminist Approach to Children's Rights.” Harvard Women's Law Journal 9 (1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1987. “Interpreting Rights: An Essay for Robert Cover.” Yale Law Journal 96 (8): 1860–915.Google Scholar
Mutua, Makau. 2008. Human Rights: A Political and Cultural Critique. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer. 2012. Relations of Freedom and Law's Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickel, James W. 2008. “Rethinking Indivisibility: Towards a Theory of Supporting Relations Between Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 30 (4): 984–1001.Google Scholar
Nickel, James W. 2009–2010. “Indivisibility and Linkage Arguments: A Reply to Gilabert.” Human Rights Quarterly 32 (2): 439–46.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
OHCHR [Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights]. n.d. “Status of Ratification.” https://indicators.ohchr.org/ (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
OIC [Organisation of Islamic Cooperation]. 2008. Charter of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. https://www.oic-oci.org/upload/documents/charter/en/oic_charter_2018_en.pdf (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
OIC [Organisation of Islamic Cooperation]. 2016. “OIC Strongly Rejects HRC Resolution on sexual orientation and gender identity.” https://www.oic-oci.org/topic/?t_id=11338&ref=4456&lan=en (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
OIC [Organisation of Islamic Cooperation]. n.d. https://www.oic-oci.org/home/?lan=en (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Open Table. n.d. http://opentable.lgbt/ (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Préposiet, Jean. 2002. Histoire de L'Anarchisme. Paris: Tallandier.Google Scholar
Queralt, Jahel, and van der Vossen, Bas. 2019. Economic Liberties and Human Rights. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reporters without Borders. World Press Freedom Index (annual). https://rsf.org/en/ranking (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Saria, Vaibhav. 2019. “Begging for Change: Hijras, Law and Nationalism.” Contributions to Indian Sociology 53 (1): 133–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames. 1993 [1873]. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Transgender Europe. n.d. https://tgeu.org/ (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Transparency International. (annual). Corruption Perceptions Index. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Valocchi, Stephen. 2017. “Capitalisms and Gay Identities.” Social Problems 64: 315–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Vossen, Bas. 2013. “Libertarian Human Rights?” Bleeding Heart Libertarians. https://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2013/05/libertarian-human-rights/ (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Whelan, Daniel J. 2010. Indivisible Human Rights: A History. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yogyakarta Principles on the Application of International Human Rights Law in Relation to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, Geneva: International Commission of Jurists (ICJ). 2007. https://yogyakartaprinciples.org (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Yogyakarta Principles Plus 10. 2017. Additional Principles and State Obligation on the Application of International Human Rights Law in Relation to Sexual Orientation, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics to Complement the Yogyakarta Principles, Geneva: International Commission of Jurists (ICJ). https://yogyakartaprinciples.org (retrieved July 1, 2021).Google Scholar
Zanghellini, Aleardo. 2020. “Philosophical Problems with the Gender-Critical Feminist Argument against Trans Inclusion.” SAGE Open: 1–14, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2158244020927029Google Scholar
Zwolinksi, Matt. 2019. “Libertarianism and the Welfare State.” In The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism, edited by Brennan, Jason, Schmidtz, David, and van der Vossen, Bas, 323–41. London: Routledge.Google Scholar