Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:12:47.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Interests and Public Support for American Global Activism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2008

Benjamin O. Fordham
Benjamin O. Fordham
Affiliation:
Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, N.Y. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This research note evaluates the effect of economic interests on public support for American global activism. Those who were relatively well-positioned to benefit economically from the American-backed postwar international order, mainly those with better access to human and financial capital, or who hailed from relatively export-oriented parts of the country, should be more likely to support it. An analysis of American National Election Study data on support for isolationism between 1956 and 2000 supports this line of argument. Individual self-interest is probably the most important pathway through which the international economy has influenced public opinion. However, the aggregate effects of exports and imports on respondents' home states have also made a difference. The effects of these economic interests are substantively large and fairly consistent over time.A previous version of this work was presented to the 2006 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. I would like to thank Michael A. Bailey, Larry Bartels, Matthew Baum, Adam Berinsky, and Kenneth Schultz for their comments. Any remaining errors and omissions are solely the responsibility of the author.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 163 - 182
Copyright
© 2008 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bacevich, Andrew J. 2002. American Empire: The Reality and Consequences of U.S. Diplomacy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Bailey, Michael A. 2003. The Politics of the Difficult: Congress, Public Opinion, and Early Cold War Aid and Trade Policies. Legislative Studies Quarterly 28 (2):147–77.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Robert E., and Christopher S. Magee. 2000. Is Trade Policy for Sale? Congressional Voting on Recent Trade Bills. Public Choice 105 (1–2):79–101.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1994. The American Public's Defense Spending Preferences in the Post–Cold War Era. Public Opinion Quarterly 58 (4):479–508.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1996. Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections. American Journal of Political Science 40 (1):194–230.Google Scholar
Beard, Charles Austin. 1936. The Devil Theory of War: An Inquiry into the Nature of History and the Possibility of Keeping Out of War. New York: Vanguard.
Beard, Charles Austin, with G. H. E. Smith. 1934. The Idea of National Interest: An Analytical Study in American Foreign Policy. New York: Macmillan.
Block, Fred. 1980. Economic Instability and Military Strength: The Paradoxes of the 1950 Rearmament Decision. Politics and Society 10 (1):35–58.Google Scholar
Broz, J. Lawrence. 2005. Congressional Politics of International Financial Rescues. American Journal of Political Science 49 (3):479–96.Google Scholar
Chicago Council on Foreign Relations. 1975–2002. American Public Opinion and Foreign Policy, 1975–2002 [computer file]. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. 〈http://www.icpsr.umich.edu〉.
Citrin, Jack, Donald P. Green, Christopher Muste, and Cara Wong. 1997. Public Opinion Toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations. Journal of Politics 59 (3):858–81.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Virginia Sapiro. 1993. Gender, Feminist Consciousness, and War. American Journal of Political Science 37 (4):1079–99.Google Scholar
Eden, Lynn. 1984. Capitalist Conflict and the State: The Making of United States Military Policy in 1948. In Statemaking and Social Movements: Essays in History and Theory, edited by Charles Bright and Susan Harding, 233–61. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ferguson, Niall. 2005. Colossus: The Rise and Fall of American Empire. New York: Penguin Books.
Fordham, Benjamin O. 1998a. Economic Interests, Party, and Ideology in Early Cold War Era U.S. Foreign Policy. International Organization 52 (2):359–96.Google Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin O. 1998b. Building the Cold War Consensus: The Political Economy of U.S. National Security Policy, 1949–51. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Fordham, Benjamin O., and Timothy J. McKeown. 2003. Selection and Influence: Interest Groups and Congressional Voting on Trade Policy. International Organization 57 (3):519–49.Google Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund, Gary M. Segura, and Michael Wilkening. 1997. All Politics Are Local: Local Losses and Individual Attitudes Toward the Vietnam War. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (5):669–94.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, and Michael J. Hiscox. 2006. Learning to Love Globalization: Education and Individual Attitudes Toward International Trade. International Organization 60 (2):469–98.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, and Michael J. Hiscox. 1988. The Domestic and Foreign Policy Beliefs of American Leaders. Journal of Conflict Resolution 32 (2):248–94.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole R., and James N. Rosenau. 1990. The Structure of Foreign Policy Attitudes Among American Leaders. Journal of Politics 52 (1):94–125.Google Scholar
Hurwitz, Jon, and Mark Peffley. 1987. How Are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model. American Political Science Review 81 (4):1099–120.Google Scholar
Kaltenthaler, Karl C., Ronald Gelleny, and Stephen J. Ceccoli. 2004. Explaining Citizen Support for Trade Liberalization. International Studies Quarterly 48 (4):829–51.Google Scholar
Klecka, William R. 1971. Applying Political Generations to the Study of Political Behavior: A Cohort Analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly 35 (3):358–73.Google Scholar
Kull, Steven, and I. M. Destler. 1999. Misreading the Public: The Myth of a New Isolationism. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Lau, Richard R., Thad A. Brown, and David O. Sears. 1978. Self-Interest and Civilians' Attitudes Toward the Vietnam War. Public Opinion Quarterly 42 (4):464–83.Google Scholar
Lubell, Samuel. 1956. The Future of American Politics. 2d ed. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Mayda, Anna Maria, and Dani Rodrik. 2005. Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist than Others? European Economic Review 49 (6):1393–430.Google Scholar
Modigliani, Andre. 1972. Hawks and Doves, Isolationism and Political Distrust: An Analysis of Public Opinion on Military Policy. American Political Science Review 66 (3):960–78.Google Scholar
Moulton, Brent R. 1990. An Illustration of a Pitfall in Estimating the Effects of Aggregate Variables on Micro Units. Review of Economics and Statistics 72 (2):334–38.Google Scholar
National Election Studies. 2004. 1948–2002 Cumulative Data File, Version 20040422 [data set]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies.
National Election Studies. 2005. The 2004 National Election Study, Version 20050816 [data set]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies.
Nincic, Miroslav. 1997. Domestic Costs, the U.S. Public, and the Isolationist Calculus. International Studies Quarterly 41 (4):593–609.Google Scholar
Peffley, Mark, and Jon Hurwitz. 1993. Models of Attitude Constraint in Foreign Affairs. Political Behavior 15 (1):61–90.Google Scholar
Rieselbach, Leroy N. 1960. The Basis of Isolationist Behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly 24 (4):645–57.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Roskin, Michael. 1974. From Pearl Harbor to Vietnam: Shifting Generational Paradigms and Foreign Policy. Political Science Quarterly 89 (3):563–88.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M. 1960. Demography, Salience, and Isolationist Behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly 24 (4):658–64.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Matthew J. Slaughter. 2001. What Determines Individual Trade-Policy Preferences? Journal of International Economics 54 (2):267–92.Google Scholar
Smuckler, Ralph H. 1953. The Region of Isolationism. American Political Science Review 47 (2): 386–401.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., and Jack Citrin. 1971. Psychological Sources of Political Belief: Self-Esteem and Isolationist Attitudes. American Political Science Review 65 (2):401–17.Google Scholar
Stolper, Wolfgang F., and Paul A. Samuelson. 1941. Protection and Real Wages. Review of Economic Studies 9:58–73.Google Scholar
Trubowitz, Peter. 1998. Defining the National Interest: Conflict and Change in American Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Williams, William Appleman. 1959. The Tragedy of American Diplomacy. Cleveland, Ohio: World Publishing.
Wittkopf, Eugene R. 1986. On the Foreign Policy Beliefs of the American People: A Critique and Some Evidence. International Studies Quarterly 30 (4):425–45.Google Scholar
Wittkopf, Eugene R. 1987. Elites and Masses: Another Look at Attitudes Toward America's World Role. International Studies Quarterly 31 (2):131–59.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1985. Pretesting Information Items on the 1986 NES Pilot Survey. Memorandum to the Board of Overseers for the National Election Studies.