Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:06:26.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Not The Whole Story

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Michael B. Katz*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essay Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Ravitch, Diane, The Troubled Crusade: American Education 1945–1980 (New York, 1984).Google Scholar

2. Vaughn-Cooke, Denys, “The Economic Status of Black America—Is There a Recovery?,” National Urban League, The State of Black America 1984 (Washington, D.C., 1984), p. 21.Google Scholar

3. Ravitch, Diane, “A Debate on Education: Diane Ravitch Comments, Deborah Meier Replies,” Dissent (Spring 1984):223.Google Scholar

4. Ravitch, Diane, “A Debate on Education.” 223.Google Scholar

5. Meier, Deborah, “‘Getting Tough’ In the Schools,” Dissent (Winter 1984):6170; and Ravitch, and Meier, , “A Debate on Education…,” 225–228.Google Scholar

6. Meier, , “A Debate on Education…,” 228. Ravitch objects vigorously to Meier's critique, which, she claims, quotes her inaccurately and distorts her meaning. (As one who has documented Ravitch's distortions of his own work, I cannot suppress a gleeful chuckle at her discomfort. How the chickens come home to roost.) See, Katz, Michael B., “An Apology for American Educational History: a Review of Diane Ravitch,” The Revisionists Revised, Harvard Educational Review, 49, 2 (1979). Although Meier did not quote accurately in some places and did leave the impression that Ravitch was more explicit about some of her views than she was, she is right about the thrust of the story. Ravitch cannot escape the implications of her version of history by hiding behind an illusory cloud of historical objectivity.Google Scholar