Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:05:31.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liberal Education and the Graduate Schools: An Historical View of College Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Jurgen Herbst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent publication of Columbia Teachers College's Institute of Higher Education, Earl J. McGrath charges that graduate education “has had a direct and profound, and on balance a harmful, effect on liberal education and the institutions society believes it has established to provide such education.” That the emerging graduate schools did exert a direct and profound effect on the American undergraduate college of the late nineteenth century, nobody will deny. That the effect has been “on balance” harmful, I believe, is open to questions.

Type
Research Article
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 1962 , pp. 244 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © 1962, University of Pittsburgh Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. The Graduate School and the Decline of Liberal Education (1959), 14.Google Scholar

2. Elliott, Edward C., ed., The Rise of a University: II, The University in Action (New York, 1937), 60–66.Google Scholar

3. Yale College: An Educational History, 1871–1921 (New Haven, 1952), 44–45.Google Scholar

4. “A Ninety-Year Old Conflict Erupts Again,” The Educational Record, XXIII (April, 1942), 192–218.Google Scholar

5. Flexner, Abraham, Daniel Coit Gilman (New York, 1946), 96, and passim. Google Scholar

6. Edward Story, William and Wilson, Louis N., eds., Clark University, 1889–1899 (Worcester, 1899), 9.Google Scholar

7. Lancaster Spalding, John, Means and Ends of Education (Chicago, 1895), 220.Google Scholar

8. “Social Life at the Hopkins Johns,” The Hullabaloo, Class of '92 (Baltimore, 1892), 11.Google Scholar

9. Life and Confessions of a Psychologist (New York and London, 1923), 338.Google Scholar

10. Deferrari, Roy J., “The Origin and Development of Graduate Studies under Catholic Auspices,” in Deferrari, , ed., Essays on Catholic Education in the United States (Washington, 1942), 207.Google Scholar

11. Spalding, 212.Google Scholar

12. The American University: When shall it be? Where shall it be? What shall it be? (Boston, 1884), 5.Google Scholar

13. James, Henry, Charles W. Eliot (Boston and New York, 1930), I, 136–37.Google Scholar

14. Hawkins, Hugh D., “Three University Presidents Testify,” American Quarterly, XI (Summer, 1959), 114, 116.Google Scholar

15. Porter, Noah, The American Colleges and the American Public, new ed. (New York, 1878), 107–08.Google Scholar

16. The New Departure in College Education (New York, 1885), 23.Google Scholar

17. Davies, John D., “The ‘Lost World’ of Andrew Fleming West, '74,” Princeton Alumni Weekly, January 15, 1960, 11.Google Scholar

18. True and False Standards of Graduate Work (Princeton, 1905), 6.Google Scholar

19. “Position and Importance of the Arts Course as Distinct from the Professional and Semi-Professional Courses,” AAU, Journal of Proceedings and Addresses (1910), 84.Google Scholar

20. Link, Arthur S., Wilson: The Road to the White House (Princeton, 1947), 37–91, passim, and Walworth, Arthur, Woodrow Wilson: American Prophet (New York, etc., 1958), I, 84–142, passim. Google Scholar

21. Quoted in Slosson, Edwin, Great American Universities (New York, 1910), 187.Google Scholar

22. Quoted in Hinsdale, Burke A., History of the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, 1906), 43.Google Scholar

23. Folwell, “Public Instruction in Minnesota,” Addresses and Journal of Proceedings, NEA (Salem, Ore., 1875), 67, 69.Google Scholar

24. White, “A National University,” ibid. (Worcester, 1874), 58–76; “The Future of American Universities,” North American Review, CLI (October, 1890), 443–52.Google Scholar

25. “The Next Step in Education,” The Forum, X (February, 1891), 632.Google Scholar

26. Russell, William F., ed., The Rise of a University (New York, 1937), I, 167.Google Scholar

27. Elliott, Edward C., ed., The Rise of a University (New York, 1937), II, 173.Google Scholar

28. Ibid., 159.Google Scholar

29. Ibid., 168.Google Scholar

30. See Jordan in Science, n.s., April 3, 1908, 530–33, The World's Work, XVI (July, 1908), 10, 453–54, and Educational Review, XXXVII (May, 1909), 537–38.Google Scholar

31. McLane, C. L., “The Junior College, or Upward Extension of the High School,” The School Review, XXI (March, 1913), 161–70.Google Scholar

32. “The Junior College,” The Forum, LXXV (March, 1926), 448–50.Google Scholar

33. University of Chicago, The President's Report, 1904–05, p. 34, and Reuben Frodin, “‘Very Simple, but Thoroughgoing’,” The Idea and Practice of General Education (Chicago, 1950), 32.Google Scholar

34. University Record, n.s., XVI (January, 1930), 12–13.Google Scholar

35. Hutchins, The State of the University, 1929–1949 (Chicago, 1949), 2–8.Google Scholar

36. “The Chicago Plan,” No Friendly Voice (Chicago, 1936), 196.Google Scholar

37. Sexson, John A. and Harbeson, John W., The New American College (New York and London, 1946), 33.Google Scholar

38. “U. of Chicago Ends Hutchins' System,” New York Times, May 21, 1959.Google Scholar

39. In Spranger, Eduard, “Reflections on Education,” Confluence, VI (Summer, 1957), 164.Google Scholar

40. Ibid., 165.Google Scholar