Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:32:56.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Varieties of contested multilateralism: Positive and negative consequences for the constitutionalisation of multilateral institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

CHRISTIAN KREUDER-SONNEN  and
BERNHARD ZANGL
CHRISTIAN KREUDER-SONNEN*
Affiliation:
LMU Munich, Geschwister-Scholl Institute of Political Science, Oettingenstraße 67, 80538 Munich, Germany & WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Research Unit Global Governance, Reichpietschufer 50, 10785 Berlin, Germany
BERNHARD ZANGL*
Affiliation:
LMU Munich, Geschwister-Scholl Institute of Political Science, Oettingenstraße 67, 80538 Munich, Germany
*
*Email: [email protected]
†Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This essay analyses the consequences of contested multilateralism (CM) for the level of constitutionalisation of specific multilateral institutions. We argue that CM has implications for institutions’ constitutional quality in particular if it is polity-driven and not (merely) policy-driven, that is, when actors’ employment of alternative institutions stems from their dissatisfaction with the political order of an institution rather than individual policies. Given the co-existence of constitutionalised and non-constitutionalised multilateral institutions in today’s international order, state and non-state actors can use alternative institutions to contest the constraining or discretionary character of an institution’s polity. We hold that CM is likely to have negative consequences for the constitutionalisation of multilateral institutions if it is employed ‘top-down’ by states to enhance their freedom to wield discretionary authority, but that it is likely to have positive consequence if it is employed ‘bottom-up’ by society actors to constrain the exercise of discretionary authority through multilateral institutions. We illustrate the empirical plausibility of our claims in two cases involving top-down contestation of the European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and bottom-up contestation of the World Health Organization (WHO).

Keywords

constitutionalisationinternational authoritymultilateral institutionsregime complexityregime shifting
Type
Special Articles
Information
Global Constitutionalism , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , November 2016 , pp. 327 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter, Karen J. and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. “The Politics of International Regime Complexity.” Perspectives on Politics 7(1):13–24.10.1017/S1537592709090033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal and Downs, George. 2007. “The Empire’s New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law.” Stanford Law Review 60(2):595–632.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Christopher J., Hodson, Dermot and Puetter, Uwe. 2015. “The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era.” Journal of Common Market Studies 53(4):703–22.10.1111/jcms.12212Google Scholar
Cohen, Deborah and Carter, Philip. 2010. “WHO and the pandemic flu ‘conspiracies’.” British Medical Journal 340:1274–9.10.1136/bmj.c2912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Mark. 2015. “The Legal and Political Accountability Structure of ‘Post-Crisis’ EU Economic Governance.” Journal of Common Market Studies 53(5):976–93.10.1111/jcms.12248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Mark and de Witte, Floris. 2013. “Constitutional Balance in the EU after the Euro-Crisis.” Modern Law Review 76(5):817–44.10.1111/1468-2230.12037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deshman, Abigail. 2011. “Horizontal Review between International Organizations: Why, How, and Who Cares about Corporate Regulatory Capture.” European Journal of International Law 22(4):1089–1113.10.1093/ejil/chr093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doshi, Peter. 2011. “The elusive definition of pandemic influenza.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 89(7):532–8.10.2471/BLT.11.086173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidler, David P. 2005. “From International Sanitary Conventions to Global Health Security: The New International Health Regulations.” Chinese Journal of International Law 4(2):325–92.10.1093/chinesejil/jmi029Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas. 2014. Human Rights in Times of Austerity Policy: The EU Institutions and the Conclusion of Memoranda of Understanding. Baden-Baden: Nomos.10.5771/9783845253534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gocaj, Ledina and Meunier, Sophie. 2013. “Time Will Tell: The EFSF, the ESM, and the Euro Crisis.” Journal of European Integration 35(3):239–53.10.1080/07036337.2013.774778Google Scholar
Godlee, Fiona. 2010. “Conflicts of interest and pandemic flu.” British Medical Journal 340:c2947.10.1136/bmj.c2947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanrieder, Tine and Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian. 2014. “WHO decides on the exception? Securitization and emergency governance in global health.” Security Dialogue 45(4):331–48.10.1177/0967010614535833Google Scholar
Heupel, Monika. 2013. “With power comes responsibility: Human rights protection in United Nations sanctions policy.” European Journal of International Relations 19(4):773–96.10.1177/1354066111426621Google Scholar
Heupel, Monika. Forthcoming 2016. “Human Rights Protection in World Bank Lending. Following the Lead of the US Congress.” In International Organizations and the Protection of Human Rights, edited by Heupel, Monika and Zürn, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks, Gary. 2015. “Delegation and pooling in international organizations.” Review of International Organizations 10(3):305–28.Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian and Weimer, Maria. 2013. “A Crisis of Executive Managerialism in the EU: No Alternative?” In Critical Legal Perspectives on Global Governance: Liber Amicorum David M Trubek, edited by de Búrca, Gráinne, Kilpatrick, Claire and Scott, Joanne, 295–322. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, Claire. 2015. “On the Rule of Law and Economic Emergency: The Degradation of Basic Legal Values in Europe’s Bailouts.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 35(2):325–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne and Ulfstein, Geir. 2009. The Constitutionalization of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543427.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian and Zangl, Bernhard. 2015. “Which post-Westphalia? International organizations between constitutionalism and authoritarianism.” European Journal of International Relations 21(3):568–94.10.1177/1354066114548736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milewicz, Karolina. 2009. “Emerging Patterns of Global Constitutionalization: Toward a Conceptual Framework.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 16(2):413–36.10.2979/gls.2009.16.2.413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, Julia and Keohane, Robert O.. 2014. “Contested Multilateralism.” Review of International Organizations 9(4):385–412.10.1007/s11558-014-9188-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 2013. “Monetary Union, Fiscal Crisis and the Disabling of Democratic Accountability.” In Politics in the Age of Austerity, edited by Streeck, Wolfgang and Schäfer, Armin, 108–42. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank and Rittberger, Berthold. 2006. “Explaining the constitutionalization of the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 13(8):1148–67.Google Scholar
Tomkin, Jonathan. 2013. “Contradiction, Circumvention and Conceptual Gymnastics: The Impact of the Adoption of the ESM Treaty on the State of European Democracy.” German Law Journal 14(1):169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, Jakob and Wade, Robert H.. 2013. “Protecting Power: How Western States Retain the Dominant Voice in The World Bank’s Governance.” World Development 46:153–64.10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje, Lang, Anthony F. Jr., Tully, James, Maduro, Miguel Poiares and Kumm, Mattias. 2012. “Editorial: Global Constitutionalism: Human rights, democracy and the rule of law.” Global Constitutionalism 1(1):1–15.10.1017/S2045381711000098CrossRefGoogle Scholar