Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:13:00.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incentives for Private Forestry: The Case of the Republic of Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Gillian Gairdner
Gillian Gairdner
Affiliation:
2 Broadsteps, The Old Road, Harbertonford, Devon TQ9 7TD, England, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Forest decline in the tropical zone of the world has provoked an enormous amount of concern but, so far, few if any panaceas. Leaving aside the pervasive impact of clearance for agriculture to focus for the time being exclusively on the role of timber extraction in the moist tropics, it appears that, in present circumstances at least, commercial logging is effectively incompatible with sustainable forest use. For this reason there is a developing interest in the potential which private-sector plantation forestry may have, in these areas, for significantly contributing to both local and export timber needs and so relieving pressure on the remaining area of natural forest. The peculiarly long-term character of investment in trees, and the capital-poor nature of the countries concerned mean, however, that financial incentives will almost certainly be necessary if plantations are to have real consequence.

It is in this context that the recent history of the forest programme in Ireland, the country with the lowest overall proportion of forest cover and the highest percentage of state (as opposed to private) forestry in the EC, may be relevant. Forestry incentives introduced in 1980, and aimed at landowners in the agriculturally disadvantaged western region, were initially ineffective, despite the region's comparative advantages for timber-growing. However, major additions to the level and range of support in the second half of the 1980s, led to an exponential increase in grant-uptake.

The very success of the above scheme in recent years has caused it to be critized for the loss of large areas of bogland which have considerable environmental value but low potential for timber production in any normal investment sense. In addition, plantations in all parts of the region are overwhelmingly coniferous. More generous, country-wide incentives for environmentally desirable broadleafed planting are too new for it to be known what effect they will have on the afforestation of the better land. It seems almost certain, however, that attempts to reconcile productive and environmental aims in private forestryprogrammes inevitably increase their complexity and cost: this has undesirable implications for the possible transfer of such schemes to developing countries in the tropics.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , Spring 1993 , pp. 50 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

An Foras Taluntais (1978). County Leitrim Resource Survey. Part 111A, Forestry: Economics, Employment and Development Proposals. An Foras Taluntais, Dublin, Ireland: 62 pp., tables and illustr.Google Scholar
An Taisce (1990). Forestry in Ireland: Policy and Practice. Compiled and written by D. Hickie. An Taisce, Dublin, Ireland: 32 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
British Land-use Study Group (1966). Forestry, Agriculture and the Multiple Use of Rural Land. HMSO, London, England, UK. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (1986). Community Action in the Forestry Sector. Complementary memorandum to the Commission's discussion paper COM (85)729. COM (1986) 26 final, Brussels, Belgium [not available for checking].Google Scholar
CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (1987). Forest Statistics, 1980–84. Eurostat, Luxembourg: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (1988). Community Strategy and Action Programme for the Forestry Sector. COM (88) 255 final. Brussels, Belgium: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Cook, A., Janetos, A. & Hinds, W. Ted (1990). Global effects of tropical deforestation: towards an integrated perspective. Environmental Conservation, 17(3), pp. 201–12, 3 figs and 3 tables.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, C. & Grut, M. (1989). Agroforestry in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Farmer's Perspective. World Bank Technical Paper No. 112. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA: vii + 94 pp.Google Scholar
Cross, J. (1987). Status and value of native broadleaved woodland. Irish Forestry, 44(2), pp. 81–8.Google Scholar
CSO (Central Statistics Office) (1988). Statistical Abstracts of Ireland. Government Publications, Dublin, Ireland: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Dunstan, G. (1986). Forests in the Landscape. Pp. 93–153 in The Future of the Irish Rural Landscape (Ed. Aalen, F.). Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
FAO (1989). European Timber Trends and Prospects to the Year 2000 and Beyond. Rome/New York: 2 vols. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Fitzsimons, B. (1987). Broadleaves in Ireland: can broadleaves give adequate financial returns? Irish Forestry, 44(2), pp. 127–34.Google Scholar
Forest & Wildlife Service (1980–1983). The Case for Forestry. Government Publications, Dublin, Ireland: vii + 75 pp., tables.Google Scholar
Forestry Commission (1989). 69th Annual Report and Accounts 1988–1989. HMSO, London, England, UK: xxx + 67 pp.Google Scholar
Forest Service (1990). Six Grant Schemes for Forestry. Operational Forestry Programme, Department of Energy, Dublin, Ireland: 14 pp.Google Scholar
Gairdner, G. (1988). Unpublished data made available to the Horticultural Extension Project, Tanga Integrated Rural Development Programme, Tanzania (GTZ): manuscript.Google Scholar
Gairdner, G. (1989). The Leitrim Resource Survey: Limits to Regional Policy in Marginal Areas. Unpublished MSc thesis, London University, London, England, UK: iii + 46 pp., tables.Google Scholar
Goodland, R.J.A., Asibey, E.O.A., Post, J.C. & Dyson, M.B. (1990). Tropical moist forest management: the urgency of transition to sustainability. Environmental Conservation, 17(4), pp. 303–18, 5 tables.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, B. & Killen, L. (1986). Farm Forestry in Ireland — Economic Issues. Pp. 171–87 in The Changing CAP and its Implications. An Foras Taluntais, Economics and Rural Welfare Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Higgins, J. (1986). The distribution of income on Irish farms. Ir. J. Agric. Rur. Econ. Socil., 11. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Joyce, P. & Gardiner, J. (1986). The management of oak in Germany. Irish Forestry, 43(1), pp. 56–65.Google Scholar
Kelleher, C. (1986). Farmers and Forestry. Pp. 188–213 in The Changing CAP and its Implications. An Foras Taluntais, Economics and Rural Welfare Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Kelleher, C. & O'Mahoney, A. (1984). Marginalisation in Irish Agriculture. (Socio-Economic Research Series, No. 4). An Foras Taluntais, Economics and Rural Welfare Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland: iii + 128 pp.Google Scholar
Keogh, R. (1986). Irish forestry and overseas development aid. Irish Forestry, 43(2), pp. 122–27.Google Scholar
Lamprecht, H. (1989). Silviculture in the Tropics. GTZ, Eschborn, Germany: 262 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. (1989). On the Economic prospects for natural management in temperate hardwoods. Forestry, 62(2), pp. 147–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutch, W. (1988). The scope for real forestry on farms. Forest Life, (3), 05 1988. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK: 2–3 pp.Google Scholar
Myers, N. (1989). Deforestation Rates in Tropical Forests and Their Climatic Implication. Friends of the Earth, London, England, UK: 153 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Pardo, R. (1990). Incentives in Establishment of Industrial Tree Plantations. FAO Advisory Committee on Pulp and Paper, 31st Session, 14–16th 05 1990, Rome, Italy: 30 pp., tables.Google Scholar
Poore, M.E.D., Burgess, P., Palmer, J., Reitbergen, S. & Synnott, T. (1990). No Timber Without Trees: Sustainability in the Tropical Forest. Earthscan [for ITTO], London, England, UK: 252 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Review Group on Forestry (1985). Report to the Minister for Fisheries and Food. Stationery Office, Dublin, Ireland: v + 81 pp., tables.Google Scholar
Wheare, J. (1990). State assistance to private forestry in Normandy. Quarterly Journal of Forestry, 84(1), pp. 49–50.Google Scholar