Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique
  4. Volume 49
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 49 - March 2004

Contents

Page 2 of 3

Reviews Comptes rendus

Back matter

  • CNJ volume 49 issue 2 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 June 2016, pp. b1-b2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Reviews Comptes rendus

Preface

  • Postface: Differentiating and Differentiated Views on Linguistic Representation

  • Peter Auer
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 June 2016, pp. 423-426

  • This special issue of the Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique is devoted to the intriguing notion of représentation linguistique, an idea that developed in French (socio-)linguistics some ten years ago (cf. Jodelet 1993), following earlier work by Anne-Marie Houdebine (1982).

    In their preface, Philippe Hambye and Anne Catherine Simon discuss one of the major tenets of this approach, namely the idea that représentation linguistique, in addition to being concerned with how language is represented in the human mind — and thus very much in line with the cognitive turn of linguistics — also implies that as a cognitive entity, language has no self-contained status in the sense of post-structualist, generative grammar. Rather, the way in which we language users look upon language is always socially contextualised. Whatever we know, in the largest sense of the word, about language and varieties of language is inextricably linked to the situations and social groups, the speakers and geographical regions, the linguistic genres and social styles that constitute it. Linguistic representations, understood as everyday knowledge of language, are therefore normatively organised. They have to do with how someone of a certain type (incumbent to a certain social category) is supposed to, or can be expected to speak, given certain typified circumstances, and what it means for him or her to speak in this way.

Other

Reviews Comptes rendus

Other

Reviews Comptes rendus

Front matter

  • CNJ volume 49 issue 3-4 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 June 2016, pp. f1-f4
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Reviews Comptes rendus

Back matter

  • CNJ volume 49 issue 3-4 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 June 2016, pp. b1-b5
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Reviews Comptes rendus

Abstract

  • Abstracts/Résumés

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 June 2016, pp. 139-141
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Books Received

Other

Front matter

  • CNJ volume 49 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 June 2016, pp. f1-f4
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 2 of 3