We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Bronkhorst, Johannes. 1983. On the history of Pāṇinian grammar in the early centuries following Patañjali. Journal of Indian Philosophy11:357–412.Google Scholar
Cardona, George. 1976Pāṇini: A survey of research. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110800104Google Scholar
Houben, Jan E.M.1998. Bhartṛhari’s Vākyapadīya and the ancient Vṛtti (1): the Vṛtti and Vṛṣabhadeva’s Paddhati on Vākyapadīya 1.46a: ātmabhedaṁ/ātmabhedas. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute78:177–198.Google Scholar
Joshi, Sivaram Dattatreya. 1989. Patañjali’s view on Apasabdas. In Dialectes dans les littératures indo-aryennes, ed. Caillat, Colette, 267–274. Paris: Institut de civilisation indienne.Google Scholar
Liebich, Bruno. 1891. Panini: Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der indischen Literatur und Grammatik. Leipzig: Haessel.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight. 1884The study of Hindu grammar and the study of Sanskrit. American Journal of Philology5, 3 (19):279–297. [Reprinted in Whitney on language: Selected writings of William Dwight Whitney. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1971, 287–305].Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight. 1893. On recent studies on Hindu grammar. American Journal of Philology14:171–197.Google Scholar