Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-15T18:52:07.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On finite G-locally primitive graphs and the Weiss conjecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Mohammad A. Iranmanesh
Mohammad A. Iranmanesh
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Yazd University, Yard, 89195–741Iran, e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A graph Γ is said to be a G-locally primitive graph, for G ≥ Aut Γ, if for every vertex, α, the stabiliser Gα induces a primitive permutation group on Γ (α) the set of vertices adjacent to α. In 1978 Richard Weiss conjectured that there exists a function f: ℕ →ℕ such that for any finite connected vertex-transitive G-locally primitive graph of valency d and a vertex α of the graph, |Gα| ≥ f(d). The purpose of this paper is to prove that, in the case Soc(G) = Sz(q), the conjecture is true.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , December 2004 , pp. 353 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2004

References

[1]Conder, M.D., Li, C.H. and Praeger, C.E., ‘On the Weiss Conjecture for finite locally-primitive graphs’, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 43 (2000), 129–138.Google Scholar
[2]Gardiner, T., ‘Doubly primitive vertex stabilizers in graphs’, Math. Z. 135 (1974), 157–166.Google Scholar
[3]Gardiner, T., ‘Arc transitivity in graphs II’, Quart. J. Math. Oxford (2) 25 (1974), 163–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Gardiner, T., ‘Arc transitivity in graphs III’, Quart. J. Math. Oxford (2) 27 (1976), 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Godsil, C.D., ‘On the full automorphism group of a graph’, Combinatorica 1 (1981), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Praeger, C.E., ‘Imprimitive symmetric graphs’, Ars Combin. 19 (1985), 149–163.Google Scholar
[7]Sabidussi, G., ‘Vertex-transitive graphs’, Monatsh. Math. 68 (1964), 426–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Suzuki, M., ‘On a class of doubly transitive groups’, Ann. of Math. 75 (1962), 105–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Trofimov, V.I., ‘Stabilizers of the vertices of graphs with projective suborbits’, Soviet Math. Dokl. 42 (1991), 825–828.Google Scholar
[10]Trofimov, V.I., ‘Graphs with projective suborbits’, (in Russian), Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 55 (1991), 890–916.Google Scholar
[11]Trofimov, V.I., ‘Graphs with projective suborbits, cases of small characteristics, I’, (in Russian), Izv, Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 58 (1994), 124–171.Google Scholar
[12]Trofimov, V.I., ‘Graphs with projective suborbits, cases of small characteristics, II’, (in Russian), Izv, Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 58 (1994), 137–156.Google Scholar
[13]Weiss, R., ‘Group with a (B, N)-pair and locally transitive graphs’, Nagoya Math. J. 74 (1979), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Weiss, R., ‘An application of p-factorization methods to symmetric graphs’, Math. Proc. Cambr. Phil. Soc. 85 (1979), 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Weiss, R., ‘Permutation groups with projective unitary subconstituents’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 78 (1980), 157–161.Google Scholar
[16]Weiss, R., ‘s-transitive graphs’, Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai 25 (1978), 827–847.Google Scholar