Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T21:27:02.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mating activity of Bactrocera cacuminata (Hering) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on its larval host plant Solanum mauritianum Scopoli in southeast Queensland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2007

R.A.I. Drew ,
D.J. Rodgers ,
S. Vijaysegaran  and
C.J. Moore
R.A.I. Drew*
Affiliation:
International Centre for the Management of Pest Fruit Flies, Australian School of Environmental Studies, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Queensland 4111, Australia
D.J. Rodgers
Affiliation:
International Centre for the Management of Pest Fruit Flies, Australian School of Environmental Studies, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Queensland 4111, Australia
S. Vijaysegaran
Affiliation:
International Centre for the Management of Pest Fruit Flies, Australian School of Environmental Studies, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Queensland 4111, Australia
C.J. Moore
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Industries, Yeerongpilly, Queensland 4105, Australia
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +61 7 3735 3697 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A detailed study was conducted on the mating behaviour of Bactrocera cacuminata (Hering) (Diptera: Tephritidae) in nature. Plant tissues from Solanum mauritianum Scopoli, the primary larval host for B. cacuminata, were also analysed for methyl eugenol content. In the field, over a 15 month period, 44,171 observations of adult B. cacuminata individuals were made including 1109 mating pairs on S. mauritianum. Calling behaviour consisting of wing fanning and anus beating by males was also consistently observed on the underside of leaves of S. mauritianum after sunset. Female flies that arrived into these groups of 10–15 calling males were mated and often remained coupled until dawn. No methyl eugenol was detected from the analysis of leaves, flowers and fruits of S. mauritianum. Thus, B. cacuminata does not need to aggregate at sites where methyl eugenol is present and the hypothesis that this chemical plays a role in the selection of mating sites by B. cacuminata is not supported by the current study. It is concluded that S. mauritianum is the primary site of mating for B. cacuminata in nature and that the concept that the larval host plant is the centre of activity for dacine fruit flies remains robust, being fully supported by the results of this study.

Keywords

Bactrocera cacuminatamating behaviourhost plantmethyl eugenol
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 98 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 77 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aluja, M., Pinero, J., Jacome, I., Diaz-Fleischer, F. & Sivinski, J. (2000) Behavior of flies in the Genus Anastrepha (Trypetinae: Toxotrypanini). pp. 375–406in Aluja, M. & Norrbom, A.L. (Eds) Fruit Flies (Tephritidae): Phylogeny and Evolution of Behavior. New York, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Bartak, P., Bednar, P., Lubomir, C., Ondrakova, L. & Stransky, Z. (2003) SPME – a valuable tool for investigation of flower scent. Journal of Separation Science 26, 715–721.Google Scholar
Brophy, J.J., Goldsack, R.J. & Rozefelds, A.C. (2003) Chemistry of the Australian gymnosperms – Part 5: Leaf essential oils of some endemic Tasmanian gymnosperms: Diselma archeri, Lagarostrobos franklinii, Microcachrys tetragona and Phyllocladus aspleniifolius. Journal of Essential Oil Research 15, 217–220.Google Scholar
Drew, R.A.I. (1987) Behavioural strategies of fruit flies of the genus Dacus (Diptera: Tephritidae) significant in mating and host-plant relationships. Bulletin of Entomological Research 77, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, R.A.I. (2004) Biogeography and speciation in the Dacini (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae). pp. 165–178. in Evenhuis, N.L. & Kaneshiro, K.Y. (Eds) D. Elmo Hardy Memorial Volume Contributions to the Systematics and Evolution of Diptera. Bishop Museum Bulletin in Entomology 12.Google Scholar
Drew, R.A.I. & Lloyd, A.C. (1987) Relationship of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and their bacteria to host plants. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 80, 629–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, R.A.I. & Lloyd, A.C. (1989) 3.1.3 Bacteria associated with fruit flies and their host plants. pp. 131–140in Robinson, A.S. & Hooper, G.H.S. (Eds) Fruit Flies, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Drew, R.A.I. & Lloyd, A.C. (1991) Bacteria in the life cycle of tephritid fruit flies. pp. 441–465in Barbosa, P., Krischik, V.A. & Jones, C.G. (Eds) Microbial Mediation of Plant-Herbivore Interactions. New York, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Kuba, H. & Sokei, Y. (1988) The production of pheromone clouds by spraying in the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Ethology 6, 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohinata, K., Jacobson, M., Kobayashi, R.M., Chambers, D.L., Fujimoto, M.S. & Higa, H.H. (1982) Oriental fruit fly and melon fly: Biological and chemical studies of smoke produced by males. Journal of Environmental Science and Health A17, 197–216.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R.J., Bennett, E.W. & Bush, G.L. (1971) Mating behaviour in Rhagoletis pomonella. Site of assembly. Canadian Entomologist 103, 1405–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghu, S. & Clarke, A.R. (2003) Spatial and temporal partitioning of behaviour by adult dacines: direct evidence for methyl eugenol as a mate rendezvous cue for Bactrocera cacuminata. Physiological Entomology 28, 175–184.Google Scholar
Raghu, S., Clarke, A.R. & Bradley, J. (2002) Microbial mediation of fruit fly-host plant interactions: is the host plant the “centre of activity”? Oikos 97, 319–328.Google Scholar
Tyschen, P.H. (1977) Mating behaviour of the Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae), in field cages. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 16, 459–465.Google Scholar
Vas, V. & Vekey, K. (2004) Solid-phase microextraction: a powerful sample preparation tool prior to mass spectrometric analysis. Journal of Mass Spectrometry 39, 233–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwolfer, H. (1974) Das Treffpunkt – Prinzip als Kommunikationsstrategie und Isolationsmechanisms bei Bohrfliegen (Diptera: Trypetidae). Entomologia Germanica 1, 11–20.Google Scholar