Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:43:14.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of peptides and amino acids on fermentation rate and de novo synthesis of amino acids by mixed micro-organisms from the sheep rumen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Cengiz Atasoglu ,
Carmen Valdés ,
C. James Newbold  and
R. John Wallace
Cengiz Atasoglu
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, UK
Carmen Valdés
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, UK
C. James Newbold
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, UK
R. John Wallace*
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, UK
*
†Corresponding author: Dr R. John Wallace, fax +44 (0)1224 716687, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The influence of different N sources on fermentation rate and de novo amino acid synthesis by rumen micro-organisms was investigated in vitro using rumen fluid taken from four sheep receiving a mixed diet comprising (g/kg DM): grass hay 500, barley 299·5, molasses 100, fish meal 91, minerals and vitamins 9·5. Pancreatic casein hydrolysate (P; comprising mainly peptides with some free amino acids; 10 g/l), free amino acids (AA; casein acid hydrolysate + added cysteine and tryptophan; 10 g/l), or a mixture of L-proline, glycine, L-valine and L-threonine (M; 0·83 g/l each) were added to diluted (1:3, v/v), strained rumen fluid along with 15NH4Cl (A; 1·33 g/l) and 6·7 g/l of a mixture of starch, cellobiose and xylose (1:1:1, by weight). P and AA, but not M, stimulated net gas production after 4 and 8 h incubation (P < 0·05) in comparison with A alone. P increased microbial-protein synthesis (P < 0·05) compared with the other treatments. All of the microbial-N formed after 10 h was synthesized de novo from 15NH3 in treatment A, and the addition of pre-formed amino acids decreased the proportion to 0·37, 0·55, and 0·86 for P, AA, and M respectively. De novo synthesis of amino acids (0·29, 0·42 and 0·69 respectively) was lower than cell-N. Enrichment of alanine, glutamate and aspartate was slightly higher than that of other amino acids, while enrichment in proline was much lower, such that 0·83–0·95 of all proline incorporated into particulate matter was derived from pre-formed proline. Glycine, methionine, lysine, valine and threonine tended to be less enriched than other amino acids. The form in which the amino acids were supplied, as P or AA, had little influence on the pattern of de novo synthesis. When the concentration of peptides was decreased, the proportion of microbial-N formed from NH3 increased, so that at an initial concentration of 1 g peptides/l, similar to the highest reported ruminal peptide concentrations, 0·68 of cell-N was formed from NH3. Decreasing the NH3 concentration at 1·0 g peptides/l caused proportionate decreases in the fraction of cell-N derived from NH3, from 0·81 at 0·53 g NH3-N/l to 0·40 at 0·19 g NH3-N/l. It was concluded that different individual amino acids are synthesized de novo to different extents by mixed rumen micro-organisms when pre-formed amino acids are present, and that the source of N used for synthesis of cell-N and amino acids depends on the respective concentrations of the different N sources available; however, supplementing only with amino acids whose synthesis is lowest when pre-formed amino acids are present does not stimulate fermentation or microbial growth.

Keywords

Amino acidAmmoniaProtein synthesisRumenSheep
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 81 , Issue 4 , April 1999 , pp. 307 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1999

References

Arbeeny, CM, Meyers, DS, Bergquist, KE & Gregg, RE (1992) Inhibition of fatty acid synthesis decreases very low density lipoprotein secretion in the hamster. Journal of Lipid Research 33, 843–851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banni, S, Carta, G, Contini, MS, Angioni, E, Deiana, M, Dessi, MA, Melis, MP & Corongiu, FP (1995) Conjugated diene fatty acids in human and animal tissues. In Nutrition, Lipids, Health, and Disease, pp. 218–224 [Ong, ASH, Niki, E and Packer, L, editors]. Champaign, IL: AOCS Press.Google Scholar
Banni, S, Day, BW, Evans, RW, Corongiu, FP & Lombardi, B (1994) Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric analyses of conjugated diene fatty acids in a partially hydrogenated fat. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 71, 1321–1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belury, MA, Moya-Camarena, SY, Liu, KL & Vanden Heuvel, JP (1997) Dietary conjugated linoleic acid induces peroxisome-specific enzyme accumulation and ornithine decarboxylase activity in mouse liver. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 8, 579–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, M, Fong, C, Wickens, D & Yudkin, J (1992) Diet as a source of phospholipid esterified 9,11-octadecadienoic acid in humans. Clinical Science 83, 97–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chin, SF, Liu, W, Storkson, JM, Ha, YL & Pariza, MW (1992) Dietary sources of conjugated dienoic isomers of linoleic acid, a newly recognized class of anticarcinogens. Journal of Food Composition Analysis 5, 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Deckere, EAM, De Fouw, NJ, Ritskes-Hoitinga, J, Van Nielen, WGL & Blonk, CG (1993) Effect of an atherogenic diet on lipoprotein cholesterol profile in the F1B hybrid hamster. Atherosclerosis 103, 291–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folch, J, Lees, M & Sloane Stanley, GH (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 226, 497–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, TJB, Beamand, JA, Lake, BG, Foster, JR & Gangolli, SD (1982) Peroxisome proliferation in cultured rat hepatocytes produced by clofibrate and phthalate ester metabolites. Toxicology Letters 10, 273–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, RJ & Hamilton, S (1992) A Practical Approach: Lipid Analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y-C, Luedecke, LO & Shultz, TD (1994) Effect of cheddar cheese consumption on plasma conjugated linoleic acid concentrations in men. Nutrition Research 14, 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ip, C, Scimeca, JA & Pariza, MW (1991) Mammary cancer prevention by conjugated dienoic derivative of linoleic acid. Cancer Research 51, 6118–6124.Google ScholarPubMed
Ip, C, Scimeca, JA & Thompson, H (1995) Effect of timing and duration of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on mammary cancer prevention. Nutrition and Cancer 24, 241–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, PA, Lea, LJ & Pendlington, RU (1999) Investigation of the potential of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) to cause peroxisome proliferation in rats Food and Chemical Toxicology (In the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, KG (1997) Evaluating acid base catalysts in the methylation of milk and rumen fatty acids with special emphasis on conjugated dienes and total trans fatty acids. Lipids 32, 1219–1228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kris-Etherton, PM & Dietschy, J (1997) Design criteria for studies examining individual fatty acid effects on cardiovascular disease risk factors: human and animal studies. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 65, Suppl., 1590S–1596S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, KN, Kritchevsky, D & Pariza, MW (1994) Conjugated linoleic acid and atherosclerosis in rabbits. Atherosclerosis 108, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuire, MK, Park, Y, Behre, RA, Harrison, LY, Shultz, TD & McGuire, MA (1997) Conjugated linoleic acid concentrations of human milk and infant formula. Nutrition Research 17, 1277–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, WR & Smith, LM (1964) Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters and dimethylacetals from lipids with boron fluoride-methanol. Journal of Lipid Research 5, 600–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mossoba, MM, McDonald, R, Armstrong, DJ & Page, SW (1991) Identification of minor C18 triene and conjugated diene isomers in hydrogenated oil and margarine by GC-MI-FT-IR spectroscopy. Journal of Chromatographic Science 29, 324–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolosi, RJ (1997) Dietary fat saturation effects on low-density-lipoprotein concentrations and metabolism in various animal models. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 65, Suppl., 1617S–1627S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolosi, RJ, Rogers, EJ, Kritchevsky, D, Scimeca, JA & Huth, PJ (1997) Dietary conjugated linoleic acid reduces plasma lipoproteins and early aortic atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic hamsters. Artery 22, 266–277.Google ScholarPubMed
Novikoff, AB, Novikoff, PM, Davis, D & Quintana, N (1972) Studies on microperoxisomes II. Cytochemical method for light and electron microscopy. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 20, 1006–1023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pacy, PJH, Mitropoulos, KA, Venkatesan, S, Watts, GF, Reeves, BEA & Halliday, D (1993) Metabolism of apoprotein B-100 and of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles in the absence of functional lipoprotein lipase. Atherosclerosis 103, 231–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pariza, MW (1988) Dietary fat and cancer risk. Evidence and research needs. Annual Review of Nutrition 8, 167–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, Y, Albright, KJ, Liu, W, Storkson, JM, Cook, ME & Pariza, MW (1997) Effect of conjugated linoleic acid on body composition in mice. Lipids 32, 853–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, PK, Krohn, RI, Hermanson, GT, Mallia, AK & Gartner, FH (1985) Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Analytical Biochemistry 150, 76–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spady, DK & Dietschy, J (1983) Sterol synthesis in vivo in 18 tissues of the squirrel, monkey, guinea pig, rabbit, hamster, and rat. Journal of Lipid Research 24, 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spady, DK & Dietschy, J (1985) Dietary saturated triacylglycerols suppress hepatic low density lipoprotein receptor activity in the hamster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 82, 4526–4530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugano, M, Tsujita, A, Yamasaki, M, Yamada, K, Ikeda, I & Kritchevsky, D (1997) Lymphatic recovery, tissue distribution, and metabolic effects of conjugated linoleic acid in rats. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 8, 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S & Smith, M (1985) Measurement of the diene conjugated form of linoleic acid in plasma by high performance liquid chromatography: a questionable non-invasive assay of free radical activity?. Chemical Biological Interactions 55, 357–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsutsumi, K, Inoue, Y, Hagi, A & Murase, T (1997) The novel compound NO-1886 elevates plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in hamsters and rabbits by increasing lipoprotein lipase without any effect on cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity. Metabolism 46, 257–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Amelsvoort, JMM & Meijer, GW (1997) The effects of conjugated linoleic acid in dietary triglycerides on athersclerotic risk factors in the hamster. Atherosclerosis 134, 335 Abstr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visonneau, S, Cesano, A, Tepper, SA, Scimeca, JA, Santoli, D & Kritchevsky, D (1997) Conjugated linoleic acid suppresses the growth of human breast adenocarcinoma cells in SCID mice. Anticancer Research 17, 969–974.Google ScholarPubMed
West, DB, Delany, JP, Camet, PM, Blohm, F, Truett, AA & Scimeca, J (1998) Effects of conjugated linoleic acid on body fat and energy metabolism in the mouse. American Journal of Physiology 275, R667–R672.Google ScholarPubMed