Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:23:11.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revisiting the form and function of conflict: Neurobiological, psychological, and cultural mechanisms for attack and defense within and between groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2018

Carsten K. W. De Dreu Open the ORCID record for Carsten K. W. De Dreu [Opens in a new window]  and
Jörg Gross Open the ORCID record for Jörg Gross [Opens in a new window]
Carsten K. W. De Dreu
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands Center for Research in Experimental Economics and Political Decision Making (CREED), University of Amsterdam, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2300 RB Leiden, The [email protected]@joerg-gross.nethttps://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/staffmembers/carsten-de-dreuhttp://www.joerg-gross.net
Jörg Gross
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands Center for Research in Experimental Economics and Political Decision Making (CREED), University of Amsterdam, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2300 RB Leiden, The [email protected]@joerg-gross.nethttps://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/staffmembers/carsten-de-dreuhttp://www.joerg-gross.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Conflict can profoundly affect individuals and their groups. Oftentimes, conflict involves a clash between one side seeking change and increased gains through victory and the other side defending the status quo and protecting against loss and defeat. However, theory and empirical research largely neglected these conflicts between attackers and defenders, and the strategic, social, and psychological consequences of attack and defense remain poorly understood. To fill this void, we model (1) the clashing of attack and defense as games of strategy and reveal that (2) attack benefits from mismatching its target's level of defense, whereas defense benefits from matching the attacker's competitiveness. This suggests that (3) attack recruits neuroendocrine pathways underlying behavioral activation and overconfidence, whereas defense invokes neural networks for behavioral inhibition, vigilant scanning, and hostile attributions; and that (4) people invest less in attack than defense, and attack often fails. Finally, we propose that (5) in intergroup conflict, out-group attack needs institutional arrangements that motivate and coordinate collective action, whereas in-group defense benefits from endogenously emerging in-group identification. We discuss how games of attack and defense may have shaped human capacities for prosociality and aggression, and how third parties can regulate such conflicts and reduce their waste.

Keywords

behavioral game theorybiobehavioral approach–avoidancecoevolution of prosociality and aggressionconflictconflict interventioncultural institutionsintergroup relationspsychological adaptations
Type
Target Article
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e116
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaldering, H., Ten Velden, F. S., Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2018) Parochial cooperation in intergroup conflict is reduced when it harms out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 114(6):909–923.Google Scholar
Abbink, K. (2012) Laboratory experiments on conflict. In: The Oxford handbook of the economics of peace and conflict, ed. Garfinkel, M. R. & Skaperdas, S., pp. 532–53. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abbink, K., Brandts, J., Herrmann, B. & Orzen, H. (2010) Inter-group conflict and intra-group punishment in an experimental contest game. American Economic Review 100:420–47.Google Scholar
Abbink, K., Brandts, J., Hermann, B. & Orzen, H. (2012) Parochial altruism in inter-group conflicts. Economic Letters 117:45–48.Google Scholar
Abbink, K. & de Haan, T. (2014) Trust on the brink of Armageddon: The first-strike game. European Economic Review 67:190–96. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.01.009.Google Scholar
Abele, S., Stasser, G. & Chartier, T. (2010) Conflict and coordination in the provision of public goods: A conceptual analysis of continuous and step-level games. Personality and Social Psychology Review 14:385–401.Google Scholar
Albert, D. J., Walsh, M. L. & Jonik, R. H. (1993) Aggression in humans: What is its biological foundation? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 17:405–25.Google Scholar
Allen, M. W., Bettinger, R. L., Codding, B. F., Jones, T. L. & Schwitalla, A. W. (2016) Resource scarcity drives lethal attack among prehistoric hunter-gatherers in central California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 43:12120–25.Google Scholar
Alvard, M. S. & Nolin, D. A. (2002) Rousseau's whale hunt? Coordination among big-game hunters. Current Anthropology 43:533–59.Google Scholar
Andreoni, J. (1995) Warm-glow versus cold-prickle – The effects of positive and negative framing on cooperation in experiments. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110:1–21.Google Scholar
Aron, A. R., Fletcher, P. C., Bullmore, E. T., Sahakian, B. J. & Robbins, T. W. (2003) Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to the right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nature Neuroscience 6:115–16.Google Scholar
Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W. & Poldrack, R. A. (2014) Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: One decade on. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18:177–85.Google Scholar
Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M. & Turken, A. U. (1999) A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review 106:529–50.Google Scholar
Atran, S. & Ginges, J. (2012) Religious and sacred imperatives in human conflict. Science 336:855–57.Google Scholar
Avenhaus, R., Canty, M., Kilgour, D. M., von Stengel, B. & Zamir, S. (1996) Inspection games in arms control. European Journal of Operational Research 90:383–94.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Penguin.Google Scholar
Babcock, L. & Loewenstein, G. F. (1997) Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11:109–26.Google Scholar
Bacharach, S. B. & Lawler, E. J. (1981) Bargaining: Power, politics, and outcomes. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Back, E. (2013) Position toward the status quo: Explaining differences in intergroup perception between left- and right-wing affiliates. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 43:2073–82.Google Scholar
Balliet, D. & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2013) Trust, punishment and cooperation across 18 societies: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science 8:363–79.Google Scholar
Balliet, D. P., Wu, J. & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014) In-group favoritism and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 140(6):1556–81.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, M. (2015) Position effects in choice from simultaneous displays: A conundrum solved. Perspectives on Psychological Science 10:19–433.Google Scholar
Baron, J. (1994) Nonconsequentialist decisions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17:1–10.Google Scholar
Bartra, O., McGuire, J. T. & Kable, J. W. (2013) The valuation system: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value. NeuroImage 76:412–27.Google Scholar
Batson, C. (1998) Altruism. In: Handbook of social psychology, ed. Lindzey, G., Aronson, E.. Wiley.Google Scholar
Battigalli, P. & Dufwenberg, M. (2009) Dynamic psychological games. Journal of Economic Inquiry 144:1–35.Google Scholar
Bazerman, M. H., Curhan, J. R., Moore, D. A. & Valley, K. L. (2000) Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology 51:279–314.Google Scholar
Bernard, S. (2012) Cohesion from conflict: Does intergroup conflict motivate intragroup norm enforcement and support for centralized leadership? Social Psychology Quarterly 75:107–30.Google Scholar
Bernhard, H., Fischbacher, U. & Fehr, E. (2006) Parochial altruism in humans. Nature 442(7105):912–15. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature04981.Google Scholar
Blattman, C. & Miguel, E. (2010) Civil war. Journal of Economic Literature 48:3–57.Google Scholar
Bobo, L. & Hutchins, V. L. (1996) Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer's theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review 61:951–72.Google Scholar
Boehm, C. (2009) Hierarchy in the forest. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boehm, C. (2012) Ancestral hierarchy and conflict. Science 336(6083):844–47.Google Scholar
Böhm, R., Rusch, H. & Güreck, O. (2016) What makes people go to war? Defensive intentions motivate retaliatory and preemptive intergroup aggression. Evolution and Human Behavior 37(1):29–34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.06.005.Google Scholar
Böhm, R., Thielmann, I. & Hilbig, B. E. (2018) The brighter the light, the deeper the shadow: Morality also fuels aggression, conflict, and violence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41:e98.Google Scholar
Bohnet, I., Greig, F., Herrmann, B. & Zeckhauser, R. (2008) Betrayal aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. American Economic Review 98:294–310.Google Scholar
Bolton, G. E. & Ockenfels, A. (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review 90:166–93.Google Scholar
Book, A. S. & Quinsey, V. L. (2004) Psychopaths: Cheaters or warrior-hawks? Personality and Individual Differences 36:33–45.Google Scholar
Boot, N. C., Baas, M., Van Gaal, S., Cools, R. & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2017) Creative cognition and dopaminergic modulation of fronto-striatal networks: Integrative review and research agenda. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 78:13–23.Google Scholar
Bornstein, G. (2003) Intergroup conflict: Individual, group, and collective interests. Personality and Social Psychology Review 7(2):129–45.Google Scholar
Bornstein, G., Budescu, D. & Zamir, S. (1997) Cooperation in intergroup, N-person, and two-person games of chicken. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41:384–406.Google Scholar
Bornstein, G. & Gilula, Z. (2003) Between-group communication and conflict resolution in assurance and chicken games. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47:326–39.Google Scholar
Bornstein, G., Gneezy, U. & Nagel, R. (2002) The effect of intergroup competition on group coordination: An experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior 41:1–25.Google Scholar
Bornstein, G., Kugler, T. & Zamir, S. (2005) One team must win, the other need only not lose: An experimental study of an asymmetric participation game. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 18:111–23.Google Scholar
Bornstein, G., Mindelgrin, D. & Rutte, C. (1996) The effects of within-group communication on group decision and individual choice in the assurance and chicken games. Journal of Conflict Resolution 40:486–501.Google Scholar
Bornstein, G. & Weisel, O. (2010) Punishment, cooperation, and cheater detection in “noisy” social exchange. Games 1:18–33.Google Scholar
Bottom, W. P. & Studt, A. (1993) Framing effects and the distributive aspect of integrative bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 56:459–74.Google Scholar
Bouwmeester, S., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Aczel, B., Barbosa, F., Begue, L., Branas-Garza, P., Chmura, T. G. H., Cornelissen, G., Dossing, F. S., Espin, A. M., Evans, A. M., Ferreira-Santos, F., Fiedler, S., Flegr, J., Ghaffari, M., Glockner, A., Goeschl, T., Guo, L., Hauser, O. P., Hernan-Gonzalez, R., Herrero, A., Horne, Z., Houdek, P., Johannesson, M., Koppel, L., Kujal, P., Laine, T., Lohse, J., Martins, E. C., Mauro, C., Mischkowski, D., Mukherjee, S., Myrseth, R., Navarro-Martinez, D., Neal, T. M. S., Novakova, J., Paga, R., Paiva, T. O., Palfi, B., Piovesan, M., Rahal, R. M., Salomon, E., Srinivasan, N., Srivastava, A., Szaszi, B., Szollosi, A., Thor, K. O., Tinghog, G., Trueblood, J. S., Van Bavel, J. J., van 't Veer, A. E., Vastfjall, D., Warner, M., Wengstrom, E., Wills, J. & Wollbrant, C. E. (2017) Registered replication report: Rand, Greene, and Nowak, 2012. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12:527–42.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. (2009) Did warfare amongst ancestral hunter and gatherers affect the evolution of social behaviors? Science 324:1293–98.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. (2011) A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, P., Firat, B. & Van Leeuwen, F. (2015) Safety, threat, and stress in intergroup relations: A Coalitional Index Model. Perspectives on Psychological Science 10:434–50.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. & Liénard, P. (2006) Why ritualized behavior? Precaution systems and action parsing in developmental, pathological and cultural rituals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29:1–56Google Scholar
Braver, T. S. (2012) The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16:106–13.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. & Kramer, R. M. (1986) Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50:543–49.Google Scholar
Brodie, E. D. III, & Brodie, E. D. Jr. (1999) Predator-prey arms races. BioScience 47:557–68.Google Scholar
Brundage, J. A. (1962) The Crusades: A documentary survey. Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Brunnschweiler, C. N. & Bulte, E. H. (2009) Natural resources and violent conflict: Resource abundance, dependency, and the onset of civil war. Oxford Economic Papers 61:651–74.Google Scholar
Buhaug, H. & Rod, J. (2006) Local determinants of African civil wars 1970–2001. Political Geography 25:315–335.Google Scholar
Burke, M., Hsiang, S. M. & Miguel, E. (2015) Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production. Nature 527:235–239.Google Scholar
Calo-Blanco, A., Kovářík, J., Mengel, F. & Romero, J. G. (2017) Natural disasters and indicators of social cohesion. PLoS One 12:e0176885–13.Google Scholar
Camerer, C. F. (2003) Behavioral game theory. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1972) On the genetics of altruism and the counter-hedonic components in human culture. Journal of Social Issues 28:21–37.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1975) On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. American Psychologist 30:1103.Google Scholar
Carneiro, R. (1981) The chiefdom as precursor of the state. In: The transition to statehood in the New World, ed. Jones, G. & Krautz, R.. pp. 37–79. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carnevale, P. J. (1986) Strategic choice in mediation. Negotiation Journal 2:41–56.Google Scholar
Carnevale, P. J. & Pruitt, D. G. (1992) Negotiation and mediation. Annual Review of Psychology 43:531–82.Google Scholar
Carter, J. R. & Anderton, C. H. (2001) An experimental test of a predator–prey model of appropriation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 45(1): 83–97.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S. & White, T. L. (1994) Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67:319–33.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. R., Baron, R. S. & Inman, M. L. (2006) Misperceptions in intergroup conflict. Psychological Science 17:38–45.Google Scholar
Choi, J. K. & Bowles, S. (2007) The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science 318(5850):636–40. Available at: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/318/5850/636.full.Google Scholar
Choi, J. P., Chowdhury, S. M. & Kim, J. (2016) Group contests with internal conflict and power asymmetry. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 118:816–40.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, S. M., Jeon, J. Y. & Ramalingam, A. (2018) Property rights and loss aversion in contests. Economic Inquiry 56(3):1492–511.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, S. M., Lee, D. & Sheremeta, R. M. (2013) Top guns may not fire: Best-shot group contests with group-specific public good prizes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 92:94–103.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, S. M. & Topolyan, I. (2016a) The attack-defense group contests: Best-shot versus weakest-link. Economic Inquiry 54:548–57.Google Scholar
Cikara, M. & Van Bavel, J. J. (2014) The neuroscience of intergroup relations: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science 9:245–74.Google Scholar
Clark, D. J. & Konrad, K. A. (2007) Asymmetric conflict: Weakest link against best shot. Journal of Conflict Resolution 51:457–69.Google Scholar
Coan, J. A. & Allen, J. J. (2003) Frontal EEG asymmetry and the behavioral activation and inhibition systems. Psychophysiology 40:106–14.Google Scholar
Colman, A. M. (2003) Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26:139–98.Google Scholar
Coombs, C. H. (1973) A reparameterization of the prisoner's dilemma game. Behavioral Science 18:424–28.Google Scholar
Coombs, C. H. & Avrunin, G. S. (1988) The structure of conflict. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Correll, J. & Park, B. (2005) A model of the in-group as a social resource. Personality and Social Psychology Review 9:341–59.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1987) From evolution to behaviour: Evolutionary psychology as the missing link. In: The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and optimality, ed. Dupre, J., pp. 276–306. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cunningham, D. E., Gleditsch, K. S. & Salehyan, I. (2009) It takes two: A dyadic analysis of civil war duration and outcome. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53:570–97.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1873) The descent of man. Appleton.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. & Krebs, J. R. (1979) Arms races between and within species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 205:489–511.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W. (2010) Social conflict: The emergence and consequences of struggle and negotiation. In: Handbook of social psychology, ed. Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T. & Lindzey, H., 5th edition, vol. 2, pp. 983–1023. Wiley.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W. (2012) Oxytocin modulates cooperation within and competition between groups: An integrative review and research agenda. Hormones and Behavior 61:419–28.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Balliet, D. & Halevy, N. (2014) Parochial cooperation in humans: Forms and functions of self-sacrifice in intergroup competition and conflict. Advances in Motivational Science 1:1–47.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W. & Carnevale, P. J. (2003) Motivational bases of information processing and strategy in conflict and negotiation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 35:235–91.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Carnevale, P. J. D., Emans, B. J. M. & Van de Vliert, E. (1994) Effects of gain-loss frames in negotiation: Loss aversion, mismatching, and frame adoption. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60:90–107.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Evers, A., Beersma, B., Kluwer, E. S. & Nauta, A. (2001) A theory-based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior 22:645–68.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Giacomantonio, M., Giffin, M. R. & Vecchiato, G. (2019) Psychological constraints on aggressive predation in economic contests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000531.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W. & Giffin, M. R. (2018) Hormonal modulation of attacker-defender contests. Unpublished manuscript, Leiden University.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Greer, L. L., Handgraaf, M. J. J., Shalvi, S., Van Kleef, G. A., Baas, M., Ten Velden, F. S., Van Dijk, E. & Feith, S. W. W. (2010) The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science 328:1408–11.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Gross, J., Meder, Z., Griffin, M. R., Prochazkova, E., Krikeb, J. & Columbus, S. (2016a) In-group defense, out-group aggression, and coordination failure in intergroup conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 113:10524–29.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Kluwer, E. S. & Nauta, A. (2008) The structure and management of conflict: Fighting or defending the status quo. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 11:331–53.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Kret, M. E. & Sligte, I. G. (2016b) Modulating prefrontal control in humans reveals distinct pathways to competitive success and collective waste. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 11:1236–44.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W. & McCusker, C. (1997) Gain-loss frames and cooperation in two-person social dilemmas: A transformational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72:1093–106.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Nauta, A. & Van de Vliert, E. (1995) Self-serving evaluation of conflict behavior and escalation of the dispute. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25:2049–66.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Scholte, H. S., Van Winden, F. A. A. M. & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2015) Oxytocin tempers calculated greed but not impulsive defense in predator-prey contests. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 5:721–28.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Weingart, L. R. & Kwon, S. (2000) Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytical review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78:889–905.Google Scholar
De Juan, A. (2015) Long-term environmental change and geographical patters of violence in Dafur, 2003–2005. Political Geography 45:22–33.Google Scholar
De la Rosa, L. E. (2011) Overconfidence and moral hazard. Games and Economic Behavior 73:429–51.Google Scholar
Decety, J. & Cowell, J. M. (2014) The complex relation between morality and empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18:337–9.Google Scholar
Dechenaux, E., Kovenock, D. & Sheremeta, R. M. (2015) A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions, and tournaments. Experimental Economics 18(4):609–69.Google Scholar
Depue, R. A. & Collins, P. F. (1999) Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:491–523.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1973) The resolution of conflict. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Doğan, G., Glowacki, L. & Rusch, H. (2018) Spoils division rules shape aggression between natural groups. Nature Human Behaviour 2(5):322–26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0338-z.Google Scholar
Dosenbach, N. U. F., Fair, D. A., Cohen, A. L., Schlaggar, B. L. & Petersen, S. E. (2008) A dual-networks architecture of top-down control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12:99–105.Google Scholar
Dresher, M. (1962) A sampling inspection problem in arms control agreements: A game-theoretic analysis. Memorandum RM-2972-ARPA. RAND Corp.Google Scholar
Dufwenberg, M., Gächter, S. & Hennig-Schmidt, H. (2011) The framing of games and the psychology of play. Games and Economic Behavior 73:459–78.Google Scholar
Dugatkin, L. A. & Godin, J. G. (1992) Prey approaching predators: A cost-benefit perspective. Annals Zoologica Fennici 29:233–52.Google Scholar
Durham, W. H. (1976) Resource competition and human aggression: 1. Review of primitive war. Quarterly Review of Biology 51:385–415.Google Scholar
Durham, Y., Hirshleifer, J. & Smith, V. (1998) Do the rich get richer and the poor poorer? Experimental tests of a model of power. American Economic Review 88:970–83.Google Scholar
Earle, T. (1987) Chiefdoms in archaeological and ethno-historical perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology 16:279–308.Google Scholar
Efferson, C., Lalive, R. & Fehr, E. (2008) The coevolution of cultural groups and in-group favoritism. Science 321:1844–49.Google Scholar
Egas, M. & Riedl, A. (2008) The economics of altruistic punishment and the maintenance of cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275:871–78.Google Scholar
Eisenegger, C., Haushofer, J. & Fehr, E. (2011) The role of testosterone in social interaction. Trends in Cognitive Science 15:263–71.Google Scholar
Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., Tjotta, S. & Torsvik, G. (2010) Testing guilt aversion. Games and Economic Behavior 68:95–107.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J. & Church, M. A. (1997) A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72:218–32.Google Scholar
Engelmann, D. & Strobel, M. (2004) Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximum preferences in simple distribution experiments. American Economic Review 94:857–69.Google Scholar
Falk, D. & Hildebolt, C.F. (2017) Annual war deaths in small-scale versus state societies scale with population size rather than violence. Current Anthropology 58(6):805–13.Google Scholar
Fearon, J. D., Humphreys, M. & Weinstein, J. M. (2009) Can development aid contribute to social cohesion after civil was? Evidence from a field experiment in post-conflict Liberia. American Economic Review 99:287–91.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review 90:980–94.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415(6868):137–40.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114:817–68.Google Scholar
Fiedler, K. (2000) Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review 107:659–76.Google Scholar
Fischer, R., Callander, R., Reddish, P. & Bulbulia, J. (2013) How do rituals affect cooperation? An experimental field study comparing nine ritual types. Human Nature 24(2):115–25.Google Scholar
Fiske, A. P. (1992) The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review 99:689–723.Google Scholar
Fiske, A. P. & Tetlock, P. E. (1997) Taboo trade-offs: Reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice. Political Psychology 18:255–97.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. (1980) Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38:889–906.Google Scholar
Fjelde, H. (2015) Farming or fighting? Agricultural price shocks and civil war in Africa. World Development 67:525–34.Google Scholar
Flood, M. M. (1972) The hide and seek game of Von Neumann. Management Science 18:107–109.Google Scholar
Ford, R. & Blegen, M. (1992) Offensive and defensive use of punitive tactics in explicit bargaining. Social Psychology Quarterly 55:351–62.Google Scholar
Fu, F., Tarnita, C. E., Christakis, N. A., Wang, L., Rand, D. G. & Nowak, M. A. (2012) The evolution of in-group favoritism. Scientific Reports 2:460.Google Scholar
Gächter, S., Nosenzo, D. & Sefton, M. (2013) Peer effects in pro-social behavior: Social norms or social preferences? Journal of the European Economic Association 11:548–73.Google Scholar
Galanter, N., Silva, D., Rowell, J. T. & Rychtářc, J. (2017) Resource competition amid overlapping territories: The territorial raider model applied to multi-group interactions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 412:100–106.Google Scholar
Garcia, J. & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2011) Evolution of parochial altruism by multilevel selection. Evolution and Human Behavior 32:277–87.Google Scholar
Garcia, J., Van Veelen, M. & Traulsen, A. (2014) Evil green beards: Tag recognition can also be used to withhold cooperation in structured populations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 360:181–86.Google Scholar
Gavrilets, S. & Fortunato, L. (2014) A solution to the collective action problem in between-group conflict with within-group inequality. Nature Communications 5:Article No. 3526. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4526.Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., LaFree, G., Fahey, S. & Feinberg, E. (2013) Culture and extremism. Journal of Social Issues 69:495–517.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. & Brighton, H. (2009) Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science 1:107–43.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D. G. (1996) Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review 103:650–69.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. & Selten, R. (2002) Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gilead, M. & Lieberman, N. (2014) We take care of our own: Caregiving salience increases out-group bias in response to out-group threat. Psychological Science 25:1380–87.Google Scholar
Glowacki, L., Isakov, A., Wrangham, R. W., McDermott, R., Fowler, J. H. & Christakis, N. A. (2016) Formation of raiding parties for intergroup violence is mediated by social network structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 113:12114–19.Google Scholar
Glowacki, L. & Von Rueden, C. (2015) Leadership solves collective action problems in small-scale societies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 370(1683):20150010.Google Scholar
Gneezy, A. & Fessler, D. M. (2012) Conflict, sticks and carrots: War increases prosocial punishments and rewards. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279:219–23.Google Scholar
Gochman, C. S. & Maoz, Z. M. (1984) Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1976: Procedures, patterns, and insights. Journal of Conflict Resolution 28:585–616.Google Scholar
Goddard, S. E. (2015) The rhetoric of appeasement: Hitler's legitimation and British foreign policy, 1938–39. Security Studies 24:95–130.Google Scholar
Goeree, J. K., Holt, C. A. & Palfrey, T. R. (2003) Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennies games. Games and Economic Behavior 45:97–113.Google Scholar
Gould, R. V. (1999) Collective violence and group solidarity: Evidence from a feuding society. American Sociological Review 64:356–80.Google Scholar
Gould, R. V. (2000) Revenge as sanction and solidarity display: An analysis of vendettas in nineteenth-century Corsica. American Sociological Review 65:682–704.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1990) Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion 4:269–88.Google Scholar
Green, M. J. & Phillips, M. L. (2004) Social threat perception and the evolution of paranoia. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 28:333–42.Google Scholar
Griesser, M. & Ekman, J. (2005) Nepotistic mobbing behavior in the Siberian jay, Perisoreus infaustus. Animal Behavior 69:345–52.Google Scholar
Gross, J., Meder, Z. Z., Okamoto-Barth, S. & Riedl, A. (2016) Building the Leviathan: Voluntary centralisation of punishment power sustains cooperation in humans. Nature Scientific Reports 6:20767.Google Scholar
Gross, J., Woelbert, E., Zimmermann, J., Okamoto-Barth, S., Riedl, A. & Goebel, R. (2014) Value signals in the prefrontal cortex predict individual preferences across reward categories. Journal of Neuroscience 34:7580–86.Google Scholar
Grossman, H. I. & Kim, M. (1996) Predation and production. In: The political economy of conflict and appropriation, ed. Garfinkel, M. R. & Skaperdas, S., pp. 57–71. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, H. I. & Kim, M. (2002) Predation and accumulation. Journal of Economic Growth 158:393–407.Google Scholar
Gürerk, O., Irlenbusch, B. & Rockenbach, B. (2006) The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science 312:108–11.Google Scholar
Haberli, M. A., Aeschlimann, P. B. & Milinski, M. (2005) Sticklebacks benefit from closer predator inspection: An experimental test of risk assessment. Ethology Ecology, and Evolution 17:249–59.Google Scholar
Halevy, N. (2016) Preemptive strikes: Fear, hope, and defensive aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 112:224–37.Google Scholar
Halevy, N., Bornstein, G. & Sagiv, L. (2008) “In-group love” and “out-group hate” as motives for individual participation in intergroup conflict: A new game paradigm. Psychological Science 19(4):405–11.Google Scholar
Halevy, N. & Chou, E. Y. (2014) How decisions happen: Focal points and blind spots in interdependent decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 106:398–417.Google Scholar
Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., Cohen, T. R. & Bornstein, G. (2010) Relative deprivation and intergroup competition. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 13:685–700.Google Scholar
Halevy, N. & Halali, E. (2015) Selfish third parties act as peacemakers by transforming conflicts and promoting cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 112:6937–42.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1971) Geometry for selfish herd. Journal of Theoretical Biology 31:295–301.Google Scholar
Hare, R. D. & Neumann, C. S. (2008) Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 4:217–46.Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E. & Sigelman, J. (2001) State anger and prefrontal brain activity: Evidence that insult-related relative left-prefrontal activation is associated with experienced anger and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(5):797–803.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G. & Nettle, D. (2006) The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10:47–66.Google Scholar
Haslam, N. (2006) Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10:252–64.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. & McElreath, R. (2003) The evolution of cultural evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology 12:123–35.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J. C., Gurven, M., Gwako, E., Henrich, N., Lesorogol, C., Marlowe, F. W., Tracer, D. & Ziker, J. (2006) Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312:1767–70.Google Scholar
Hermalin, B. E. (1998) Toward an economic theory of leadership: Leading by example. American Economic Review 88:1188–206.Google Scholar
Heyman, J. & Ariely, D. (2004) Effort for payment: A tale of two markets. Psychological Science 15:787–93.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. (1997) Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist 52:1280–300.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. (2000) Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist 55:1217–30.Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, J. (1988) The analytics of continuing conflict. Synthese 76:201–33.Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, J. (1991) The paradox of power. Economics & Politics 3:177–200.Google Scholar
Humphreys, M. & Weinstein, J. N. (2006) Handling and manhandling civilians in civil war. American Political Science Review 100:429–47.Google Scholar
Humphreys, M. & Weinstein, J. M. (2008) Who fights? The determinants of participation in civil war. American Journal of Political Science 52:436–55.Google Scholar
Huth, P. & Russett, B. (1984) What makes deterrence work: Cases from 1900 to 1980. World Politics 36:496–526.Google Scholar
Ifcher, J. & Zarghamee, H. (2014) Affect and overconfidence: A laboratory investigation. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology and Economics 7:125–50.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. C., Jong, J., Bilkey, D., Whitehouse, H., Zollmann, S. & McNaughton, C. & Halberstadt, J. (2018) Synchrony and physiological arousal increase cohesion and cooperation in large naturalistic groups. Scientific Reports 8:127.Google Scholar
Janis, I. L. (1972) Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascos. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Janssen, M., Anderies, J. M. & Joshi, S. R. (2011) Coordination and cooperation in asymmetric commons dilemmas. Experimental Economics 14:547–66.Google Scholar
Jervis, R. (1978) Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics 30:167–214.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. D. P. (2004) Overconfidence and war: The havoc and glory of positive illusions. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. D. P. (2005) God's punishment and public good – A test of the supernatural punishment hypothesis in 186 world cultures. Human Nature 16:410–46.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. D. P. (2006) Overconfidence in war games: Experimental evidence on expectations, aggression, gender, and testosterone. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273:2513–20.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. D. P. & Fowler, J. H. (2011) The evolution of overconfidence. Nature 477:316–20.Google Scholar
Jones, D. M., Bremer, S. A. & Singer, J. D. (1996) Militarized interstate disputes 1816–1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15:163–215.Google Scholar
Kagel, J. H. & Roth, A. E. (1995) Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Klein, G. (2009) Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist 64:515–26.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. & Thaler, R. H. (1991) The endowment effect, loss aversion, and the status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5:193–206.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–91.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1984) Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 39(4):341–50.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1995) Conflict resolution: A cognitive perspective. In: Barriers to conflict resolution, ed. Arrow, K., Mnookin, R. H., Ross, L., Tversky, A. & Wilson, R., pp. 44–61. Norton.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E. & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003) An atlas of interpersonal relations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. & Thibaut, J. W. (1978) Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. Wiley.Google Scholar
Keltner, D. & Robinson, R. J. (1997) Defending the status quo: Power and bias in social conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23:1066–77.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1919) The economic consequences of the peace. MacMillan.Google Scholar
Kluwer, E. S., Heesink, J. A. M. & Van de Vliert, E. (1997) The marital dynamics of conflict over the division of labor. Journal of Marriage and Family 59:635–53.Google Scholar
Knoch, D., Gianotti, L. R., Pascual-Leone, A., Treyer, V., Regard, M., Hohmann, M. & Brugger, P. (2006a) Disruption of right prefrontal cortex by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces risk-taking behavior. Journal of Neuroscience 26:6469–72.Google Scholar
Knoch, D., Pascual, L. A., Meyer, K., Trever, V. & Fehr, E. (2006b) Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science 314:829–32.Google Scholar
Koellinger, P. & Treffers, T. (2015) Joy leads to overconfidence, and a simple countermeasure. PLoS One 12:e0143263.Google Scholar
Konrad, K. A. & Morath, F. (2012) Evolutionary stable in-group favoritism and out-group spite in intergroup conflict. Journal of Theoretical Biology 306:61–67.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M. (1995) Power, paranoia and distrust in organizations: The distorted view from the top. Research on Negotiation in Organizations 5:119–54.Google Scholar
Kteily, N., Saguy, T., Sidanus, J. & Taylor, D. M. (2013) Negotiating power: Agenda ordering and the willingness to negotiate in asymmetric intergroup conflicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 105(6):978–95.Google Scholar
Kuhberger, A. (1998) The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75:23–55.Google Scholar
Lacomba, J., Lagos, F., Reuben, E. & van Winden, F. (2014) On the escalation and de-escalation of conflict. Games and Economic Behavior 86:40–57.Google Scholar
Lamm, C., Decety, J. & Singer, T. (2011) Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. Neuroimage 54:2492–502.Google Scholar
Lang, M., Bahma, V., Shaver, J. H., Reddish, P. & Xygalatas, D. (2017) Sync to link: Endorphin-mediated synchrony effects on cooperation. Biological Psychology 127:191–97.Google Scholar
Lebreton, M., Jorge, S., Michel, V., Thirion, B. & Pessiglione, M. (2009) An automatic valuation system in the human brain: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Neuron 64:431–39.Google Scholar
Levati, M. V., Sutter, M. & Van der Heijden, R. (2007) Leading by example in a public goods experiment with heterogeneity and incomplete information. Journal of Conflict Resolution 51:793–818.Google Scholar
Levy, D. J. & Glimcher, P. W. (2011) Comparing apples and oranges: Using reward-specific and reward-general subjective value representation in the brain. Journal of Neuroscience 31:14693–707.Google Scholar
Levy, D. J. & Glimcher, P. W. (2012) The root of all value: A neural common currency for choice. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 22:1027–38.Google Scholar
Leyens, J. P., Demoulin, S., Vaes, J., Gaunt, R. & Paladino, M. P. (2007) Infra-humanization: The wall of group differences. Social Issues and Policy Review 1:139–72.Google Scholar
Li, K., Szolnoski, A., Cong, R. & Wang, L. (2016) The coevolution of overconfidence and bluffing in the resource competition game. Scientific Reports 6:21104.Google Scholar
Loerakker, B. & Van Winden, F. (2017) Emotional leadership in an intergroup conflict game. Journal of Economic Psychology 63:143–67.Google Scholar
Lopez, A. C. (2017) The evolutionary psychology of war: Offense and defense in the adapted mind. Evolutionary Psychology 15(4):1474704917742720. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917742720.Google Scholar
Macfarlan, S. J., Walker, R. S., Flinn, M. V. & Chagnon, N. A. (2014) Lethal coalitionary aggression and long-term alliance formation among Yanomamö men. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 111(47):16662–69.Google Scholar
Mann, M. (2018) Have wars and violence declined? Theory and Society 47:37–60.Google Scholar
Masuda, N. (2012) In-group favoritism and intergroup cooperation under intergroup reciprocity based on group reputation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 21:8–18.Google Scholar
McBride, M. & Skaperdas, S. (2014) Conflict, settlement, and the shadow of the future. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 105:75–89.Google Scholar
McCusker, C. & Carnevale, P. J. (1995) Framing in resource dilemmas: Loss aversion and the moderating effects of sanctions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 61:190–201.Google Scholar
McDonough, F. (1997) The origins of the First and Second World Wars. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McKay, R., Efferson, C., Whitehouse, H. & Fehr, E. (2011) Wrath of God: Religious primes and punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278(1713):1858–63.Google Scholar
Mehta, P. H. & Beer, J. (2010) Neural mechanisms of the testosterone-aggression relations: The role of the orbitofrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22:2357–68.Google Scholar
Meloy, J. R. & Gothard, S. (1995) Demographic and clinical comparison of obsessional followers and offenders with mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 152:258–63.Google Scholar
Messick, D. M. & Thorngate, W. B. (1967) Relative gain maximization in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 3:85–101.Google Scholar
Mgbeoji, I. (2006) The civilised self and the barbaric other: Imperial delusions of order and the challenges of human security. Third World Quarterly 27:855–69.Google Scholar
Mikolic, J. M., Parker, J. C. & Pruitt, D. G. (1997) Escalation in response to persistent annoyance: Groups versus individuals and gender effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72:151–63.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1848/2008) Principles of political economy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, B. (2009) Between revisionist and the frontier state: Regional variations in state war-propensity. Review of International Studies 35:85–119.Google Scholar
Molenberghs, P. (2013) The neuroscience of in-group bias. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 8:1530–36.Google Scholar
Molenberghs, P., Trautwein, F. M., Bockler, A., Singer, T. & Kanske, P. (2016) Neural correlates of metacognitive ability and feeling confident: A large-scale fMRI study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 11:1942–51.Google Scholar
Montoya, E. R., Terburg, D., Bos, P. A. & van Honk, J. (2012) Testosterone, cortisol, and serotonin as key regulators of social aggression: A review and theoretical perspective. Motivation and Emotion 36:65–73.Google Scholar
Nakashima, N. A., Halali, E. & Halevy, N. (2017) Third parties promote cooperative norms in repeated interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 68:212–23.Google Scholar
Neale, M. A. & Bazerman, M. H. (1985) The effects of framing and overconfidence on bargaining behaviors and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 28:34–49.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. J. & Trainor, B. C. (2007) Neural mechanisms of aggression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8:536–46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2174.Google Scholar
Neuberg, S. L., Warner, C. M., Mistler, S. A., Berlin, A., Hill, E. D., Johnson, J. D., Filip-Crawford, G., Millsap, R. E., Thomas, G., Winkelman, M., Broome, B. J., Taylor, T. J. & Schober, J. (2014) Religion and intergroup conflict: Findings from the Global Group Relations Project. Psychological Science 25:198–206.Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A. & Shariff, A. F. (2008) The origin and evolution of religious pro-sociality. Science 322:58–62.Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E. & Henrich, J. (2016) The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:1–65.Google Scholar
Nosenzo, D., Offerman, T., Sefton, M. & van der Veen, A. (2013) Encouraging compliance: Bonuses versus fines in inspection games. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 30:623–48.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A. (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314:1560–63.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E. & Wilson, E. O. (2010) The evolution of eusociality. Nature 466:1057–62.Google Scholar
Oka, R. C., Kissel, M., Golitko, M., Sheridan, S. G., Kim, N. C. & Fuentes, A. (2017) Population is the main driver of war group size and conflict casualties. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 114:11101–10.Google Scholar
Oprea, R., Charness, G. & Friedman, D. (2014) Continuous time and communication in a public-goods experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 108:212–23.Google Scholar
Otsubo, H. (2015) Nash equilibria in a two-person discrete all-pay auction with unfair tie-break and complete information. Economics Bulletin 35:2443–54.Google Scholar
Patrick, C. J. (1994) Emotion and psychopathy: Startling new insights. Psychophysiology 31:319–30.Google Scholar
Peterson, C. K., Gable, P. & Harmon-Jones, E. (2008) Asymmetrical frontal ERPs, emotion, and behavioral approach/inhibition sensitivity. Social Neuroscience 3:113–24.Google Scholar
Pietrazewski, D. (2016) How the mind sees group and coalitionary conflict: The evolutionary invariances of n-person conflict dynamics. Evolution and Human Behavior 37:470–80.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2011) The better angels of our mind. Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Plous, S. (1985) Perceptual illusions and military realities: The nuclear arms race. Journal of Conflict Resolution 29:363–89.Google Scholar
Posner, M. I. & Rothbart, M. K. (2007) Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology 58:1–23.Google Scholar
Potegal, M. (2012) Temporal and frontal lobe initiation and regulation of the top-down escalation of anger and aggression. Behavioral Brain Research 231:386–95.Google Scholar
Potters, J., Sefton, M. & Vesterlund, L. (2007) Leading-by-example and signaling in voluntary contribution games: An experimental study. Economic Theory 33:169–82.Google Scholar
Pratto, F. & John, O. P. (1991) Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61:380–91.Google Scholar
Prediger, S., Vollan, B. & Benedikt, H. (2014) Resource scarcity and antisocial behavior. Journal of Public Economics 119:1–9.Google Scholar
Pruitt, D. G. (1967) Reward structure and cooperation: The decomposed Prisoner's Dilemma Game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 7:21–27.Google Scholar
Pruitt, D. G. (1981) Negotiation. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pruitt, D. G. (1998) Social conflict. In: Handbook of social psychology, ed. Gilbert, D., Fiske, S. T. & Lindzey, G., 4th ed., vol. 2, pp. 89–150. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pruitt, D. G. & Kimmel, M. J. (1977) Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology 28(1):363–92.Google Scholar
Pruitt, D. G. & Rubin, J. Z. (1986) Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. Random House.Google Scholar
Purzycki, B. B., Apicella, C., Atkinson, Q. D., Cohen, E., McNamara, R. A., Willard, A. K., Xygalatas, D., Norenzayan, A. & Henrich, J. (2016) Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality. Nature 530:327.Google Scholar
Quillian, L. (1995) Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat – Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review 60:586–611.Google Scholar
Radford, A. N. (2008) Duration and outcome of intergroup conflict influences intragroup affiliative behavior. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275:2787–91.Google Scholar
Radford, A. N., Majolo, B. & Aureli, F. (2016) Within-group behavioural consequences of between-group conflict: A prospective review. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283(1843):20161567.Google Scholar
Rai, T. S. & Fiske, A. P. (2011) Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review 118:57–75.Google Scholar
Rai, T. S., Valdesolo, P. & Graham, J. (2017) Dehumanization increases instrumental violence, but not moral violence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 114:8511–16.Google Scholar
Raleigh, C. & Hegre, H. (2009) Population size, concentration, and civil war: A geographically disaggregated analysis. Political Geography 28:224.Google Scholar
Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D. & Nowak, M. A. (2012) Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature 489:427–30.Google Scholar
Rapoport, A. (1960) Fights, games, and debates. Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Rapoport, A. & Bornstein, G. (1987) Intergroup competition for the provision of binary public-goods. Psychological Review 94:291–99.Google Scholar
Rilling, J. K. & Sanfey, A. G. (2011) The neuroscience of social decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 62:23–48.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. J. & Keltner, D. (1996) Much ado about nothing? Revisionists and traditionalists choose an introductory English syllabus. Psychological Science 7:18–24.Google Scholar
Roccas, S., Sagiv, L. & Schwartz, S. (2008) Toward a unifying model of identification with groups. Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review 12:280–306.Google Scholar
Roskes, M., Elliot, A. & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014) Regulating avoidance motivation: A conservation of energy approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science 23:133–38.Google Scholar
Ross, L. & Ward, A. (1995) Psychological barriers to dispute resolution. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 27:255–304. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rusch, H. (2013) Asymmetries in altruistic behavior during violent intergroup conflict. Evolutionary Psychology 11(5):973–93.Google Scholar
Rusch, H. (2014a) The two sides of warfare: An extended model of altruistic behavior in ancestral human intergroup conflict. Human Nature 25(3):359–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-014-9199-yGoogle Scholar
Rusch, H. (2014b) The evolutionary interplay of intergroup conflict and altruism in humans: a review of parochial altruism theory and prospects for its extension. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1794):20141539.Google Scholar
Rusch, H. & Gavrilets, S. (2019) The logic of animal intergroup conflict: A review. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.05.004.Google Scholar
Saalveld, V., Ramadan, Z., Bell, V. & Raihani, N. J. (2018) Experimentally induced social threat increases paranoid thinking. Royal Society Open 5:180569.Google Scholar
Samuelson, W. & Zeckhauser, R. (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1:7–59.Google Scholar
Sand, H., Wikenros, C., Wabakken, P. & Liberg, O. (2006) Effects of hunting group size, snow depth and age on the success of wolves hunting moose. Animal Behavior 72:781–89.Google Scholar
Sapolsky, R. M. (2005) The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science 308:648–52.Google Scholar
Sapolsky, R. M. (2017) Behave. Penguin.Google Scholar
Sapolsky, R. M., Romero, L. M. & Munck, A. U. (2000) How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocrine Reviews 21:55–89.Google Scholar
Schaub, M. (2017) Threat and parochialism in intergroup relations: Lab-in-the-field evidence from rural Georgia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284(1865):20171560.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C. (1960) The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, A., Roeling, T. A. P., Gregg, T. R. & Kruk, M. R. (1999) Neuropharmacology of brain-stimulation-evoked aggression. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 23:359–98.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review 63:129–38.Google Scholar
Simunovic, D., Mifune, N. & Yamagishi, T. (2013) Preemptive strike: An experimental study of fear-based aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49(6):1120–3.Google Scholar
Skaperdas, S. & Syropoulos, C. (1996) Can the shadow of the future harm cooperation? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 29:355–72.Google Scholar
Slantchev, B. (2010) Feigning weakness. International Organization 64:357–88.Google Scholar
Snyder, G. H. & Diesing, P. (1977) Conflict among nations: Bargaining, decision making, and system structure in international crises. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sonnemans, J., Schram, A. & Offerman, T. (1998) Public good provision and public bad prevention: The effect of framing. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 34:143–61.Google Scholar
Staub, E. (1996) Cultural societal roots of violence – The examples of genocidal violence and of contemporary youth violence in the United States. American Psychologist 51:117–32.Google Scholar
Steele, M. A., Halkin, S. L., Smallwood, P. D., McKenna, T. J., Mitsopoulos, K. & Beam, M. (2008) Cache protection strategies of a scatter-hoarding rodent: Do tree squirrels engage in behavioral deception? Animal Behavior 75:705–14.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2003) A duplex theory of hate: Development and application to terrorism, massacres, and genocide. Review of General Psychology 7:299–328.Google Scholar
Stott, C. & Reicher, S. (1998) How conflict escalates: The inter-group dynamics of collective football crowd “violence.” Sociology 32:353–77.Google Scholar
Strang, S., Gross, J., Schuhmann, T., Riedl, A., Weber, B. & Sack, A. T. (2015) Be nice if you have to – The neurobiological roots of strategic fairness. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 10(6):790–96.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. E. (1991) Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events – The mobilization minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 110:67–85.Google Scholar
Ten Velden, F. S., Beersma, B. & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2011) When competition breeds equality: Effects of appetitive versus aversive competition in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47:1127–33.Google Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1990) The past explains the present – Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology 11:375–424.Google Scholar
Traulsen, A. & Nowak, M. A. (2006) Evolution of cooperation by multilevel selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:10952–55.Google Scholar
Tullock, G. (1980) Efficient rent seeking. In: Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society, ed. Buchanan, J. M., Tollison, R. D. & Tullock, G., pp. 97–112. Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Ufkes, E. G., Giebels, E., Otten, S. & Van der Zee, K. I. (2014) The effectiveness of a mediation program in symmetrical versus asymmetrical neighbor-to-neighbor conflicts. International Journal of Conflict Management 23:440–57.Google Scholar
Ule, A., Schram, A., Riedl, A. & Cason, T. N. (2009) Indirect punishment and generosity toward strangers. Science 326:1701–704.Google Scholar
Van de Vliert, E. (1992) Questions about the strategic choice model of mediation. Negotiation Journal 8:379–86.Google Scholar
Van de Vliert, E. (2013) Climato-economic habitats support patterns of human needs, stresses, and freedoms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(5):465–480.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, E., De Kwaadsteniet, E. W. & De Cremer, D. (2009) Tacit coordination in social dilemmas: The importance of having a common understanding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96:665–78.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H. & Wit, A. (2003) Preferences for leadership in social dilemmas: Public good dilemmas versus common resource dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39:170–76.Google Scholar
Van Evera, S. (2003) Why states believe foolish ideas: Non-self evaluation by states and societies. In: Perspectives on structural realism, ed. Hanami, A. K., pp. 163–98. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999) The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77:337–49.Google Scholar
Van Vugt, M. & De Cremer, D. (1999) Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76:587–99.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. (1982) Unsuccessful predation and evolution. American Naturalist 120:701–20.Google Scholar
Vogel, D. L. & Karney, B. R. (2002) Demands and withdrawal in newlyweds: Elaborating on the social structure hypothesis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 19:685–701.Google Scholar
Von Neumann, J. (1953) A certain zero-sum two-person game equivalent to the optimal assignment problem. In: Contributions to the theory of games, vol. II, ed. Kuhn, H. W. & Tucker, A. W., pp. 5–12. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, R. H., King, A. J., McNutt, J. W. & Jordan, N. R. (2017) Sneeze to leave: African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) use variable quorum thresholds facilitated by sneezes in collective decisions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284:20170347.Google Scholar
Watson-Jones, R. E. & Legare, C. H. (2016) The social functions of rituals. Current Directions in Psychological Science 25:42–46.Google Scholar
Waytz, A., Young, L. L. & Ginges, J. (2014) Motive attribution asymmetry for love vs. hate drives intractable conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 111(44):15687–92.Google Scholar
Webster, D. (1975) Warfare and the evolution of the state: A reconsideration. American Antiquity 40:464–70.Google Scholar
Weinstein, J. M. (2005) Resources and the information problem in rebel recruitment. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49:598–624.Google Scholar
Weisel, O. & Zultan, R. (2016) Social motives in intergroup conflict: Group identity and perceived target of threat. European Economic Review 90:122–33. Available at: .https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.01.004.Google Scholar
West, S. A., Griffin, A. S. & Gardner, A. (2007) Evolutionary explanations for cooperation. Current Biology 17:661–72.Google Scholar
Wheeler, B. (2009) Monkeys crying wolf? Tufted capuchin monkeys use anti-predator calls to usurp resources from conspecifics. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276(1669):3013–18.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H. & Lanman, J. A. (2014) The ties that bind us: Ritual, fusion, and identification. Current Anthropology 55(6):674–95.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H., McQuinn, B., Buhrmester, M. & Swann, W. B. (2014) Brothers in arms: Libyan revolutionaries bond like family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 111(50):17783–85.Google Scholar
Willems, E. P. & Van Schaik, C. P. (2017) The social organization of Homo ergaster: Inferences from anti-predator responses in extant primates. Journal of Human Evolution 109:11–21.Google Scholar
Wrangham, R. W. (2018) Two types of aggression in human evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 115:245–53. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713611115.Google Scholar
Wright, T. M. (2014) Territorial revision and state repression. Journal of Peace Research 51:375–87.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T. (1986) The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51:110–16.Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Gross, J., De Dreu, C. K. W. & Ma, Y. (2019) Oxytocin promotes coordinated out-group attack during intergroup conflict in humans. eLife 8; e40698. doi: 10.7554/eLife.40698.Google Scholar
Manchester, W. (1980) Goodbye, darkness: A memoir of the Pacific war. Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar
Gross, J. & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2019b) The rise and fall of cooperation through reputation and group polarization. Nature Communications 10:1–10. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08727-8Google Scholar
Gross, J., Emmerling, F., Vostroknutov, A. & Sack, A. T. (2018) Manipulation of pro-sociality and rule-following with non-invasive brain stimulation. Scientific Reports 8 (1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19997-5Google Scholar