Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-gr6zb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T21:03:51.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revising the null model in language evolution research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2025

Svetlana Kuleshova Open the ORCID record for Svetlana Kuleshova [Opens in a new window] ,
Michael Pleyer Open the ORCID record for Michael Pleyer [Opens in a new window] ,
Johan Blomberg Open the ORCID record for Johan Blomberg [Opens in a new window] ,
Marta Sibierska Open the ORCID record for Marta Sibierska [Opens in a new window]  and
Sławomir Wacewicz Open the ORCID record for Sławomir Wacewicz [Opens in a new window]
Svetlana Kuleshova*
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Linguistics, Centre for Language Evolution Studies, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] https://cles.umk.pl/ Department of Anthropology, ArScAn-Équipe AnTET (UMR 7041), CNRS, Université Paris Nanterre, Nanterre, France [email protected]
Michael Pleyer
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Linguistics, Centre for Language Evolution Studies, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] https://cles.umk.pl/
Johan Blomberg
Affiliation:
Division of Linguistics, Phonetics and Cognitive Semiotics, Center for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Lund, Sweden [email protected]
Marta Sibierska
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Linguistics, Centre for Language Evolution Studies, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] https://cles.umk.pl/
Sławomir Wacewicz
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Linguistics, Centre for Language Evolution Studies, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] https://cles.umk.pl/
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We comment on the consequences of the target article for language evolution research. We propose that the default assumption should be that of language-readiness in extinct hominins, and the integration of different types of available evidence from multiple disciplines should be used to assess the likely extent of the realization of this readiness. The role of archaeological evidence should be reconsidered.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e12
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arbib, M. A. (2012). How the brain got language: The mirror system hypothesis. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthet, M., Coye, C., Dezecache, G., & Kuhn, J. (2023). Animal linguistics: A primer. Biological Reviews, 98(1), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botha, R. (2010). On the soundness of inferring modern language from symbolic behaviour. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 20(3), 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botha, R. (2020). Neanderthal language: Demystifying the linguistic powers of our extinct cousins. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botha, R., & Everaert, M. (Eds.). (2013). The evolutionary emergence of language: Evidence and inference. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkart, J., Martins, E. G., Miss, F., & Zürcher, Y. (2018). From sharing food to sharing information: Cooperative breeding and language evolution. Interaction Studies, 19(1–2), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.17026.burCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chater, N., Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2009). Restrictions on biological adaptation in language evolution. PNAS, 106(4), 1015–1020. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807191106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, M. H., & Kirby, S. (Eds.) (2003). Language evolution. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delliponti, A., Raia, R., Sanguedolce, G., Gutowski, A., Pleyer, M., Sibierska, M., … Wacewicz, S. (2023). Experimental semiotics: A systematic categorization of experimental studies on the bootstrapping of communication systems. Biosemiotics, 16(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-023-09534-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W. T. (2010). The evolution of language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackendoff, R. (2010). Your theory of language evolution depends on your theory of language. In Larson, R. K., Deprez, V., & Yamakido, H. (Eds.), The evolution of human language (pp. 63–72). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817755.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, S. (2005). Origins of language: Constraints on hypotheses. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithen, S. (2024). The language puzzle: How we talked our way out of the stone age. Profile Books.Google Scholar
Müller, T. F., & Raviv, L. (2024). Communication games: Social interaction in the formation of novel communication systems. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/8acdzGoogle Scholar
Nölle, J., & Galantucci, B. (2023). Experimental semiotics: Past, present, and future. In Ibáñez, A. M. G. A. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of semiosis and the brain (pp. 66–81), Routledge.Google Scholar
Pleyer, M., & Lindner, N. (2014). Constructions, construal and cooperation in the evolution of language. In Cartmill, E. A., Roberts, S., Lyn, H., & Cornish, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th conference (pp. 244–251). World scientific.Google Scholar
Roberts, G. (2017). The linguist's drosophila: Experiments in language change. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(1), 20160086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, S. G., Killin, A., Deb, A., Sheard, C., Greenhill, S. J., Sinnemäki, K., … Jordan, F. (2020). CHIELD: The causal hypotheses in evolutionary linguistics database. Journal of Language Evolution, 5(2), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T. C., & Kirby, S. (2010). Language evolution in the laboratory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(9), 411–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamariz, M. (2017). Experimental studies on the cultural evolution of language. Annual Review of Linguistics, 3, 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacewicz, S., Żywiczyński, P., Hartmann, S., Pleyer, M., & Benitez-Burraco, A. (2020). Language in language evolution research: In defense of a pluralistic view. Biolinguistics, 14(SI), 59–101.Google Scholar
Zhang, E. Q., & Pleyer, M. (2024). Toward interdisciplinary integration in the study of comparative cognition: Insights from studying the evolution of multimodal communication. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 19, 85–90. https://doi.org/10.3819/CCBR.2024.190017CrossRefGoogle Scholar