No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Meta-learning and the evolution of cognition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 September 2024
Abstract
Meta-learning offers a promising framework to make sense of some parts of decision-making that have eluded satisfactory explanation. Here, we connect this research to work in animal behaviour and cognition in order to shed light on how and whether meta-learning could help us to understand the evolution of cognition.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Andrews, K., & Monsó, S. (2021). Animal cognition. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/cognition-animal/Google Scholar
Binz, M., Gershman, S. J., Schulz, E., & Endres, D. (2022). Heuristics from bounded meta-learned inference. Psychological Review, 129, 1042–1077. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000330CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meaning of life. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Veit, W. (2023). A philosophy for the science of animal consciousness. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Meta-learned models of cognition
Related commentaries (22)
Bayes beyond the predictive distribution
Challenges of meta-learning and rational analysis in large worlds
Combining meta-learned models with process models of cognition
Integrative learning in the lens of meta-learned models of cognition: Impacts on animal and human learning outcomes
Is human compositionality meta-learned?
Learning and memory are inextricable
Linking meta-learning to meta-structure
Meta-learned models as tools to test theories of cognitive development
Meta-learned models beyond and beneath the cognitive
Meta-learning and the evolution of cognition
Meta-learning as a bridge between neural networks and symbolic Bayesian models
Meta-learning goes hand-in-hand with metacognition
Meta-learning in active inference
Meta-learning modeling and the role of affective-homeostatic states in human cognition
Meta-learning: Bayesian or quantum?
Probabilistic programming versus meta-learning as models of cognition
Quantum Markov blankets for meta-learned classical inferential paradoxes with suboptimal free energy
Quo vadis, planning?
The added value of affective processes for models of human cognition and learning
The hard problem of meta-learning is what-to-learn
The meta-learning toolkit needs stronger constraints
The reinforcement metalearner as a biologically plausible meta-learning framework
Author response
Meta-learning: Data, architecture, and both