No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Meta-learned models beyond and beneath the cognitive
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 September 2024
Abstract
I propose that meta-learned models, and in particular the situation-aware deployment of “learning-to-infer” modules can be advantageously extended to domains commonly thought to lie outside the cognitive, such as motivations and preferences on one hand, and the effectuation of micro- and coping-type behaviors.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gershman, S. J., Horvitz, E. J., & Tennenbaum, J. B. (2015). Computational rationality: A converging paradigm for intelligence in brains, minds and machines. Science, 349(6245), 273–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Y. -Y., & Laszlo-Barabassi, A. (2016). Control principles of complex systems. Review of Modern Physics, 88(3), 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livnat, A., & Pippenger, N. (2006). An optimal brain can be composed of conflicting agents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(9), 3198–3202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, B., Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Cognitive heuristics: Reasoning the fast and frugal way. In Leighton, J. P., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 273–287). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moldoveanu, M. C. (2011). Inside man: The discipline of modeling human ways of being. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Moldoveanu, M. C., & Langer, E. J. (2002). False memories of the future: A critique of the applications of probabilistic reasoning to the study of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 109(2), 358–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Meta-learned models of cognition
Related commentaries (22)
Bayes beyond the predictive distribution
Challenges of meta-learning and rational analysis in large worlds
Combining meta-learned models with process models of cognition
Integrative learning in the lens of meta-learned models of cognition: Impacts on animal and human learning outcomes
Is human compositionality meta-learned?
Learning and memory are inextricable
Linking meta-learning to meta-structure
Meta-learned models as tools to test theories of cognitive development
Meta-learned models beyond and beneath the cognitive
Meta-learning and the evolution of cognition
Meta-learning as a bridge between neural networks and symbolic Bayesian models
Meta-learning goes hand-in-hand with metacognition
Meta-learning in active inference
Meta-learning modeling and the role of affective-homeostatic states in human cognition
Meta-learning: Bayesian or quantum?
Probabilistic programming versus meta-learning as models of cognition
Quantum Markov blankets for meta-learned classical inferential paradoxes with suboptimal free energy
Quo vadis, planning?
The added value of affective processes for models of human cognition and learning
The hard problem of meta-learning is what-to-learn
The meta-learning toolkit needs stronger constraints
The reinforcement metalearner as a biologically plausible meta-learning framework
Author response
Meta-learning: Data, architecture, and both