Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:50:02.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A map of where? Problems with the “transparency” dimension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2014

David Spurrett
David Spurrett*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4041, South Africa. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Transparency is a fundamental concept in the target article by Bentley et al. But the text gives cryptic, inconclusive and sometimes conflicting suggestions as to what transparency consists of. Consequently, it is insufficiently clear what the north–south axis of the map of collective behaviour actually represents, or how to order behaviours by transparency.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 100 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dennett, D. C. (1996) Kinds of minds: Towards an understanding of consciousness. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar