Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-t27h7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-25T16:45:17.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linguistic meanings in mind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2023

Alexis Wellwood Open the ORCID record for Alexis Wellwood [Opens in a new window]  and
Tim Hunter
Alexis Wellwood
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA [email protected], https://semantics.land
Tim Hunter
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA [email protected], https://timhunter.humspace.ucla.edu/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The target article focuses on evidence from nonlinguistic faculties to defend the claim that cognition generally traffics in language-of-thought (LoT)-type representations. This focus creates needed space to discuss the mounting accumulation of nonclassical evidence for LoT, but it also misses relevant work in linguistics that directly offers a perspective on specific hypotheses about candidate LoT representations.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e289
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Church, A. (1941). The calculi of lambda conversion. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Field, H. (1978). Mental representation. Erkenntnis, 13(1), 9–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1(1), 3–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackl, M. (2009). On the grammar and processing of proportional quantifiers: Most versus more than half. Natural Language Semantics, 17, 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, T., & Wellwood, A. (2023). Linguistic meanings interpreted. Forthcoming in the Proceedings of the 45th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Knowlton, T., Hunter, T., Odic, D., Wellwood, A., Halberda, J., Pietroski, P., & Lidz, J. (2021). Linguistic meanings as cognitive instructions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1500, 134–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lidz, J., Pietroski, P., Halberda, J., & Hunter, T. (2011). Interface transparency and the psychosemantics of most. Natural Language Semantics, 6(3), 227–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, D. (1982). Vision. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Odic, D., Pietroski, P., Hunter, T., Lidz, J., & Halberda, J. (2012). Young children's understanding of “more” and discrimination of number and surface area. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(2), 451–461.Google ScholarPubMed
Peacocke, C. (1986). Explanation in computational psychology: Language, perception and level 1. Mind and Language, 1(2), 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietroski, P., Lidz, J., Hunter, T., & Halberda, J. (2009). The meaning of “most”: Semantics, numerosity and psychology. Mind and Language, 24(5), 554–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rips, L., & Hespos, S. J. (2015). Divisions of the physical world: Concepts of objects and substances. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 786–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomaszewicz, B. (2011). Verification strategies for two majority quantifiers in Polish. In Reich, I., Horch, E., & Pauly, D. (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung (Vol. 15, pp. 597–612). Universaar – Saarland University Press.Google Scholar
Wellwood, A. (2019). What more is. Philosophical Perspectives, Philosophy of Language, 32(1), 454–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellwood, A. (2020). Interpreting degree semantics. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed