No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Interacting with characters redux
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2023
Abstract
Clark and Fischer (C&F) discuss how people interact with social robots in the context of a general analysis of interaction with characters. I suggest that a consideration of aesthetic illusion would add nuance to this analysis. In addition, I illustrate how people's experiences with other depictions of characters require adjustments to C&F's claims.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Bantleon, D., & Tragatschnig, U. (2013). Wilful deceptions: Aesthetic illusion at the interface of painting, photography, and digital images. In Wolf, W., Bernhart, W. & Mahler, A. (Eds.), Immersion and distance: Aesthetic illusion in literature and other media (pp. 263–292). Rodopi.Google Scholar
Bezdek, M. A., Foy, J. E., & Gerrig, R. J. (2013). “Run for it!”: Viewers’ participatory responses to film narratives. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7 (4), 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Van Der Wege, M. A. (2015). Imagination in narratives. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E. & Schiffrin, D. (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 406–421). John Wiley.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & Bezdek, M. A. (2013). Aesthetic illusion in film. In Wolf, W., Bernhart, W. & Mahler, A. (Eds.), Immersion and distance: Aesthetic illusion in literature and other media (pp. 89–111). Rodopi.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & Jacovina, M. E. (2009). Reader participation in the experience of narrative. In Ross, B. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 51, pp. 223–254). Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, W. (2009). “Illusion (aesthetic)”. In Hühn, P., Meister, J. C., Pier, J., & Schmid, W. (Eds.), Handbook of narratology (pp. 144–159). Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wolf, W., Bernhart, W. & Mahler, A. (Eds.) (2013). Immersion and distance: Aesthetic illusion in literature and other media. Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Social robots as depictions of social agents
Related commentaries (29)
A more ecological perspective on human–robot interactions
A neurocognitive view on the depiction of social robots
Anthropomorphism, not depiction, explains interaction with social robots
Autonomous social robots are real in the mind's eye of many
Binding paradox in artificial social realities
Children's interactions with virtual assistants: Moving beyond depictions of social agents
Cues trigger depiction schemas for robots, as they do for human identities
Dancing robots: Social interactions are performed, not depicted
Depiction as possible phase in the dynamics of sociomorphing
Fictional emotions and emotional reactions to social robots as depictions of social agents
How cultural framing can bias our beliefs about robots and artificial intelligence
How deep is AI's love? Understanding relational AI
How puzzling is the social artifact puzzle?
Interacting with characters redux
Meta-cognition about social robots could be difficult, making self-reports about some cognitive processes less useful
Of children and social robots
On the potentials of interaction breakdowns for HRI
People treat social robots as real social agents
Social robots and the intentional stance
Social robots as social learning partners: Exploring children's early understanding and learning from social robots
Taking a strong interactional stance
The Dorian Gray Refutation
The now and future of social robots as depictions
The second-order problem of other minds
Trait attribution explains human–robot interactions
Unpredictable robots elicit responsibility attributions
Virtual and real: Symbolic and natural experiences with social robots
When Pinocchio becomes a real boy: Capability and felicity in AI and interactive depictions
“Who's there?”: Depicting identity in interaction
Author response
On depicting social agents