Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T21:08:01.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Group membership: Who gets to decide?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2016

Anne Jaap Jacobson
Anne Jaap Jacobson*
Affiliation:
Somerville College, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HD, United Kingdom. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this commentary, I focus on several problems that the authors' understanding of group identity raises: the legality of avoiding background diversity, the problem of effectively unshareable knowledge, the practical quality of some outcomes arrived at by groups with homogeneous backgrounds, and moral issues about fairness. I note also that much recent research challenges the view that background diversity is more likely to be a detriment than a benefit.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e155
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brownstein, M. & Saul, J. (2015) Introduction. In: Implicit bias and philosophy: Volume I, ed. Brownstein, M. & Saul, J., pp. 1–19. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, D., Ryn, M. v., Dovidio, J. & Saha, S. (2007) Reducing racial bias among health care providers: Lessons from social-cognitive psychology. Journal of General Internal Medicine 22:682–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dovidio, J. F. (2006) The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F. (2010) The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination. SAGE.Google Scholar
Gaertner, S. L. & Dovidio, J. F. (2000) Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Harding, S. G. (2004) The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. Routledge.Google Scholar
Holroyd, J. (2012) Responsibility for implicit bias. Journal of Social Philosophy 43(3):274–306.Google Scholar
Jones, J. M., Dovidio, J. F. & Vietze, D. L. (2014) The psychology of diversity beyond prejudice and racism. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kang, Y., Gray, J. R. & Dovidio, J. F. (2014) The nondiscriminating heart: Lovingkindness meditation training decreases implicit intergroup bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143(3):1306–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratcliffe, S. (2011) Concise Oxford Dictionary of Quotations. Oxford University Press,Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. (2015) Campaigns against microaggressions prompt big concerns about free speech. Chronicle of Higher Education 61(41):A8. Available at: http://chronicle.com/article/Campaigns-Against/231459/.Google Scholar