Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:53:41.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The expressive rationality of inaccurate perceptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2017

Dan M. Kahan
Dan M. Kahan*
Affiliation:
Yale Law School, P.O. Box 208215, New Haven, CT 06510. [email protected]/kahan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This commentary uses the dynamic of identity-protective cognition to pose a friendly challenge to Jussim (2012). Like other forms of information processing, this one is too readily characterized as a bias. It is no mistake, however, to view identity-protective cognition as generating inaccurate perceptions. The “bounded rationality” paradigm incorrectly equates rationality with forming accurate beliefs. But so does Jussim's critique.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e6
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, G. A. & Kranton, R. E. (2000) Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3):715–53.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. (1993) Value in ethics and economics. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N. (2012) The politics of motivation. Critical Review 24(2):199–216.Google Scholar
Jussim, L. (2012) Social perception and social reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M. (2010) Fixing the communications failure. Nature 463:296–97.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M. (2013) Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making 8:407–24.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M. (2015a) Laws of cognition and the cognition of law. Cognition 135:56–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahan, D. M. (2015b) What is the “science of science communication”? Journal of Scientific Communication 14(3):1–12.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Hoffman, D. A., Braman, D., Evans, D. & Rachlinski, J. J. (2012a) They saw a protest: Cognitive illiberalism and the speech-conduct distinction. Stanford Law Review 64:851–906.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H. & Braman, D. (2011) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research 14:147–74.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. & Slovic, P. (2013) Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper No. 116. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2319992.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D. & Mandel, G. (2012b) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature: Climate Change 2:732–35.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Frederick, S. (2005) A model of heuristic judgment. In: The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning, ed. Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R.G., pp. 267–93. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108:480–98.Google Scholar
Lessig, L. (1995) The regulation of social meaning. The University of Chicago Law Review 62:943–1045.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O., Ammirati, R. & Landfield, K. (2009) Giving debiasing away: Can psychological research on correcting cognitive errors promote human welfare? Perspectives on Psychological Science 4(4):390–98.Google Scholar
Lodge, M. & Taber, C. S. (2013) The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1877) The fixation of belief. Popular Science Monthly 12:1–15.Google Scholar
Sherman, D. K. & Cohen, G. L. (2006) The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In: Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 38, ed. Zanna, M. P., pp. 183–242. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2006) Misfearing: A reply. Harvard Law Review 119(4):1110–25.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2007) On the divergent American reactions to terrorism and climate change. Columbia Law Review 107:503–57.Google Scholar
Westen, D., Blagov, P. S., Harenski, K., Kilts, C. & Hamann, S. (2006) Neural bases of motivated reasoning: An fMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(11):1947–58.Google Scholar