Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:12:35.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The evolution of music: One trait, many ultimate-level explanations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2021

Edgar Dubourg ,
Jean-Baptiste André  and
Nicolas Baumard Open the ORCID record for Nicolas Baumard [Opens in a new window]
Edgar Dubourg
Affiliation:
ENS-PSL, 75005Paris, [email protected], [email protected] [email protected]
Jean-Baptiste André
Affiliation:
ENS-PSL, 75005Paris, [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] CNRS, 75005Paris, France EHESS, 75005Paris, France
Nicolas Baumard
Affiliation:
ENS-PSL, 75005Paris, [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] CNRS, 75005Paris, France EHESS, 75005Paris, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We propose an approach reconciling the ultimate-level explanations proposed by Savage et al. and Mehr et al. as to why music evolved. We also question the current adaptationist view of culture, which too often fails to disentangle distinct fitness benefits.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 44 , 2021 , e98
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

André, J.-B., Baumard, N., & Boyer, P. (2020). The Mystery of Symbolic Culture: What fitness costs? What fitness benefits? 18. https://osf.io/kdh7t/download?format=pdf.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Krebs, J. R., & Dawkins, R. (1978). Animal signals: Mind reading and manipulation. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary approach (pp. 282–309), Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. Z. (1966). Evolution of ritualization in the biological and cultural spheres. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 251(772), 273–284.Google Scholar
Miller, G. (2011). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. Anchor.Google Scholar
Petrie, M. (1994). Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature, 371(6498), 598–599. https://doi.org/10.1038/371598a0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrie, M., Tim, H., & Carolyn, S. (1991). Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Animal Behaviour, 41(2), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80484-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. J., Fox, J. H., Wilczynski, W., & Rand, A. S. (1990). Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature, 343(6253), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/343066a0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veblen, T. (1899). Theory of the leisure class: An Economic Study of Institutions. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection – A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53(1), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed