Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T21:05:49.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differentiation of selves: Differentiating a fuzzy concept

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2016

Andreas Mojzisch ,
Thomas Schultze ,
Joachim Hüffmeier  and
Stefan Schulz-Hardt
Andreas Mojzisch
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, University of Hildesheim, D–31141 Hildesheim, [email protected]://www.uni-hildesheim.de/fb1/institute/psychologie/mitglieder/andreas-mojzisch/
Thomas Schultze
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Georg-August-University of Goettingen, D–37073 Göttingen, [email protected]@psych.uni-goettingen.dehttps://www.psych.uni-goettingen.de/de/social/team/schultzehttps://www.psych.uni-goettingen.de/de/social/team/schulz-hardt
Joachim Hüffmeier
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, TU Dortmund University, D–44227 Dortmund, Germany. [email protected]://www.fk12.tu-dortmund.de/cms/psych/de/Home/Mitarbeiter/psychologie_ifp/Hueffmeier_Joachim.html
Stefan Schulz-Hardt
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Georg-August-University of Goettingen, D–37073 Göttingen, [email protected]@psych.uni-goettingen.dehttps://www.psych.uni-goettingen.de/de/social/team/schultzehttps://www.psych.uni-goettingen.de/de/social/team/schulz-hardt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Notwithstanding the appeal of the “one size fits all” approach that Baumeister et al. propose, we argue that there is no panacea for improving group performance. The concept of “differentiation of selves” constitutes an umbrella term for similar seeming but actually different constructs. Even the same type of “differentiation of selves” can be beneficial for some and harmful for other tasks.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gockel, C., Kerr, N. L., Seok, D.-H. & Harris, D. W. (2008) Indispensability and group identification as sources of task motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44:1316–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H. & Bell, M. P. (1998) Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal 41:96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. (1994) Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management 5:223–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly 40:256–82.Google Scholar
Larson, J. R. Jr. (2010) In search of synergy in small group performance. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R. & Frey, D. (2006) Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91:1080–93. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1080.Google Scholar
Steiner, I. D. (1972) Group process and productivity. Academic Press.Google Scholar
White, S. E., Dittrich, J. E. & Lang, J. R. (1980) The effects of group decision-making process and problem-situation complexity on implementation attempts. Administrative Science Quarterly 25:428–40.Google Scholar
Worchel, S., Rothberger, H., Day, E. A., Hart, D. & Butemeyer, J. (1998) Social identity and individual productivity within groups. British Journal of Social Psychology 37:389–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed