Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-rwnhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T21:21:35.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioural modernity is dead: Long live behavioural modernity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2025

Matthias A. Blessing Open the ORCID record for Matthias A. Blessing [Opens in a new window]
Matthias A. Blessing*
Affiliation:
Anthropology Department, University of Connecticut, Deep History Lab, Storrs, CT, USA Department of Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Working Group Older Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, Tübingen. [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using Neanderthal symbolism, I extend on Stibbard-Hawkes to show that reconsidering the link between cognitive capacity and material culture extends beyond matters of preservation. A reconceptualization of behavioural modernity inclusive of both extant and extinct populations must begin with an honest theoretical separation of biological and behavioural modernity, which requires to critically engage with how we frame the underlying questions.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e5
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, C. J. H., Riel-Salvatore, J., & Collins, B. R. (2013). Why we need an alternative approach to the study of modern human behaviour. Canadian Journal of Archaeology/Journal Canadien d'Archéologie, 37(1), 21–47.Google Scholar
Baquedano, E., Arsuaga, J. L., Pérez-González, A., Laplana, C., Márquez, B., Huguet, R., … Higham, T. (2023). A symbolic Neanderthal accumulation of large herbivore crania. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(3), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01503-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blessing, M. A. (2023). Technological complexity as an indicator of behavioural modernity: A case study on Middle Palaeolithic birch tar production and South African Microlithic technology. Doctoral Dissertation, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen. Retrieved from https://publikationen.uni-tuebingen.de/xmlui/handle/10900/136075Google Scholar
Botha, R. (2008). Prehistoric shell beads as a window on language evolution. Language & Communication, 28(3), 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botha, R. (2010). On the soundness of inferring modern language from symbolic behaviour. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 20(3), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774310000454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conard, N. J. (2008). A critical view of the evidence for a Southern African origin of behavioural modernity. South African Archaeological Society Goodwin Series, 10, 175–179. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.838113602743050Google Scholar
Conard, N. J. (2010). Cultural modernity: Consensus or conundrum? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(17), 7621–7622. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001458107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conard, N. J. (2011). Comment on Shea 2011: Homo sapiens is as Homo sapiens was: Behavioural variability versus “behavioural modernity” in Paleolithic archaeology. Current Anthropology, 52(1), 17–18.Google Scholar
d'Errico, F., Vanhaeren, M., Barton, N., Bouzouggar, A., Mienis, H., Richter, D., … Lozouet, P. (2009). Additional evidence on the use of personal ornaments in the Middle Paleolithic of North Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(38), 16051–16056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henshilwood, C. S., & Marean, C. W. (2003). The origin of modern human behavior: Critique of the models and their test implications. Current Anthropology, 44(5), 627–651. https://doi.org/10.1086/377665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keel, T. (2017). Neanderthal-human hybridity and the frontier of critical race studies. Red and Yellow, Black and Brown, 201–217.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. L., Mackie, M. E., & Kandel, A. W. (2023). Rapid increase in production of symbolic artifacts after 45,000 years ago is not a consequence of taphonomic bias. Journal of Archaeological Science, 160, 105885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, P. (2020). Characterized by darkness: Reconsidering the origins of the Brutish Neanderthal. Journal of the History of Biology, 53(4), 493–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-020-09623-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madison, P. (2021). Brutish Neanderthals: History of a merciless characterization. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 30(6), 366–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBrearty, S., & Brooks, A. S. (2000). The revolution that wasn't: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution, 39(5), 453–563. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.2000.0435CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellars, P. (1989). Major issues in the emergence of modern humans. Current Anthropology, 30(3), 349–385. https://doi.org/10.1086/203755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meneganzin, A., & Currie, A. (2022). Behavioural modernity, investigative disintegration & Rubicon expectation. Synthese, 200(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03491-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowell, A. (2010). Defining behavioural modernity in the context of Neanderthal and anatomically modern human populations. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39(1), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowell, A. (2011). Comment on Shea 2011: Homo sapiens is as Homo sapiens was: Behavioural variability versus “behavioural modernity” in Paleolithic archaeology. Current Anthropology, 52(1), 19–20.Google Scholar
Peeters, S., & Zwart, H. (2020). Neanderthals as familiar strangers and the human spark: How the “golden years” of Neanderthal research reopen the question of human uniqueness. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 42(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-020-00327-wCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scerri, E. M. L., & Will, M. (2023). The revolution that still isn't: The origins of behavioural complexity in Homo sapiens. Journal of Human Evolution, 179, 103358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2023.103358CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, J. J. (1998). Neanderthal and early modern human behavioural variability A regional-scale approach to lithic evidence for hunting in the Levantine Mousterian. Current Anthropology, 39(S1), S45–S78. https://doi.org/10.1086/204690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, J. J. (2011). Homo sapiens is as Homo sapiens was. Current Anthropology, 52(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1086/658067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiner, M. C. (2017). Love and death in the Stone Age: What constitutes first evidence of mortuary treatment of the human body? Biological Theory, 12(4), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-017-0275-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villa, P., & Roebroeks, W. (2014). Neanderthal demise: An archaeological analysis of the modern human superiority complex. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e96424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wadley, L. (2013). Recognizing complex cognition through innovative technology in Stone Age and Palaeolithic sites. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 23(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774313000309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynn, T., Overmann, K. A., & Coolidge, F. L. (2016). The false dichotomy: A refutation of the Neanderthal indistinguishability claim. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 94, 1–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Zilhão, J. (2007). The emergence of ornaments and art: An archaeological perspective on the origins of “behavioural modernity.” Journal of Archaeological Research, 15(1), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-006-9008-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilhão, J., Angelucci, D. E., Badal-García, E., d'Errico, F., Daniel, F., Dayet, L., … Montes-Bernárdez, R. (2010). Symbolic use of marine shells and mineral pigments by Iberian Neanderthals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(3), 1023–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar