Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:09:16.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attention is more than prediction precision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2013

Howard Bowman ,
Marco Filetti ,
Brad Wyble  and
Christian Olivers
Howard Bowman
Affiliation:
Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems, and the School of Computing, University of Kent at Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NF, United Kingdom. [email protected]@kent.ac.ukhttp://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/hb5/http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/rpg/mf266/
Marco Filetti
Affiliation:
Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems, and the School of Computing, University of Kent at Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NF, United Kingdom. [email protected]@kent.ac.ukhttp://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/hb5/http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/rpg/mf266/
Brad Wyble
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244. [email protected]
Christian Olivers
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, VU University Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected]://olivers.cogpsy.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A cornerstone of the target article is that, in a predictive coding framework, attention can be modelled by weighting prediction error with a measure of precision. We argue that this is not a complete explanation, especially in the light of ERP (event-related potentials) data showing large evoked responses for frequently presented target stimuli, which thus are predicted.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , June 2013 , pp. 206 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chennu, S., Craston, P., Wyble, B. & Bowman, H. (2009) Attention increases the temporal precision of conscious perception: Verifying the neural ST2 model. PLOS Computational Biology 5(11):1–13.Google Scholar
Feldman, H. & Friston, K. J. (2010) Attention, uncertainty, and free-energy. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 4:215. doi:10.3389/fnmuh.2010.00215.Google Scholar
Horstmann, G. (2002) Evidence for attentional capture by a surprising color singleton in visual search. Psychological Science 13(6):499–505.Google Scholar
Luck, S. J. (2006) The operation of attention – millisecond by millisecond – over the first half second. In: The first half second: The microgenesis and temporal dynamics of unconscious and conscious visual processing, ed. Breitmeyer, H. Ö. B. G., pp. 187–206. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Van Voorhis, S. & Hillyard, S. A. (1977) Visual evoked potentials and selective attention to points in space. Perception and Psychophysics 22(1):54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar