Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T01:32:38.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theories of reading should predict reading speed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

Denis G. Pelli
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003. [email protected]://psych.nyu.edu/pelli/
Susana T. L. Chung
Affiliation:
School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-2020. [email protected]://vision.berkeley.edu/selab/
Gordon E. Legge
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455. [email protected]://vision.psych.umn.edu/users/legge/

Abstract

Reading speed matters in most real-world contexts, and it is a robust and easy aspect of reading to measure. Theories of reading should account for speed.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bouma, H. (1970) Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature 226:177–78.Google Scholar
Crossland, M. D., Legge, G. E. & Dakin, S. C. (2008) The development of an automated sentence generator for the assessment of reading speed. Behavioral and Brain Functions 4:14. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-4-14.Google Scholar
Huey, E. B. (1908/1968) The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Macmillan/MIT Press. (Original Macmillan edition, 1908).Google Scholar
Legge, G. E. (2007) Psychophysics of reading in normal and low vision. Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Legge, G. E. & Bigelow, C. A. (2011) Does print size matter for reading? A review of findings from vision science and typography. Journal of Vision 11(5):8, 1–22. doi:10.1167/11.5.8.Google Scholar
Legge, G. E., Cheung, S.-H., Yu, D., Chung, S. T. L., Lee, H.-W. & Owens, D. P. (2007) The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading. Journal of Vision 7(2):9, 1–15. doi:10.1167/7.2.9. Available at: http://journalofvision.org/7/2/9/.Google Scholar
Legge, G. E., Mansfield, J. S. & Chung, S. T. L. (2001) Psychophysics of reading XX: Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research 41(6):725–43.Google Scholar
Masson, M. E. J. (1983) Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading. Memory & Cognition 11(3):262–74.Google Scholar
Pelli, D. G. & Tillman, K. A. (2007) Parts, wholes, and context in reading: A triple dissociation. PLoS ONE 2(8):e680. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000680. Available at: http://www.plosone.org/doi/pone.0000680.Google Scholar
Pelli, D. G. & Tillman, K. A. (2008) The uncrowded window of object recognition. Nature Neuroscience 11(10):1129–35. Available at: http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v11/n10/index.html#pe.Google Scholar
Pelli, D. G., Tillman, K. A., Freeman, J., Su, M., Berger, T. D. & Majaj, N. J. (2007) Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. Journal of Vision 7(2):20, 1–36. Available at: http://journalofvision.org/7/2/20/.Google Scholar
Rawlinson, G. (1976) The significance of letter position in word recognition. PhD thesis, Psychology Department, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom. Available at: http://psych.nyu.edu/pelli/pubs/rawlinson1976phd.zip.Google Scholar
Rawlinson, G. (1999) Reibadailty. [Letter] New Scientist 162(2188):55.Google Scholar
Woodworth, R. S. (1938) Experimental psychology. Holt.Google Scholar