No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Shallow versus deep genetic causes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 September 2023
Abstract
We argue that Madole & Harden's distinction between shallow versus deep genetic causes can bring some clarity to causal claims arising from genome-wide association studies (GWASs). However, the authors argue that GWAS only finds shallow genetic causes, making GWAS commensurate with the environmental studies they hope to supplant. We also assess whether their distinction applies best to explanations or causes.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Gannett, L. (1999). What's in a cause?: The pragmatic dimensions of genetic explanations. Biology & Philosophy, 14(3), 349–373. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006583215835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, K. E., & Bourrat, P. (2017). Interpreting heritability causally. Philosophy of Science, 84(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/688933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, D. (2008). Genes and causation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1878), 3001–3015. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0086CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Northcott, R. (2012). Genetic traits and causal explanation. In Plaisance, K. S. & Reydon, T. A. C. (Eds.), Philosophy of behavioral biology (Vol. 282, pp. 65–82). Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oftedal, G. (2005). Heritability and genetic causation. Philosophy of Science, 72(5), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1086/508126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (2016). Behaving: What's genetic, what's not, and why should we care? (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (2000). The meaning of genetic causation. In Buchanan, A., Brock, D. W., Wikler, D. & Daniels, N. (Eds.), From chance to choice: Genetics and justice (pp. 347–370). Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806940.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkheimer, E. (1998). Heritability and biological explanation. Psychological Review, 105(4), 782–791. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.782-791CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turkheimer, E. (2016). Weak genetic explanation 20 years later: Reply to Plomin et al. (2016). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(1), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615617442CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waters, C. K. (2007). Causes that make a difference. The Journal of Philosophy, 104(11), 551–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Target article
Building causal knowledge in behavior genetics
Related commentaries (23)
A disanalogy with RCTs and its implications for second-generation causal knowledge
Addressing genetic essentialism: Sharpening context in behavior genetics
All that glisters is not gold: Genetics and social science
Behavior genetics and randomized controlled trials: A misleading analogy
Behavior genetics: Causality as a dialectical pursuit
Benefits of hereditarian insights for mate choice and parenting
Building causal knowledge in behavior genetics without racial/ethnic diversity will result in weak causal knowledge
Causal dispositionalism in behaviour genetics
Drowning in shallow causality
Extensions of the causal framework to Mendelian randomisation and gene–environment interaction
Genes, genomes, and developmental process
Genetics can inform causation, but the concepts and language we use matters
Genome-wide association study and the randomized controlled trial: A false equivalence
Human genomic data have different statistical properties than the data of randomised controlled trials
Mechanistic understanding of individual outcomes: Challenges and alternatives to genetic designs
Meeting counterfactual causality criteria is not the problem
On the big list of causes
Polygene risk scores and randomized experiments
Shallow versus deep genetic causes
The providential randomisation of genotypes
Theory matters for identifying a causal role for genetic factors in socioeconomic outcomes
When local causes are more explanatorily useful
Where not to look for targets of social reforms and interventions, according to behavioral genetics
Author response
Causal complexity in human research: On the shared challenges of behavior genetics, medical genetics, and environmentally oriented social science