Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T08:27:37.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Musical bonds are orthogonal to symbolic language and norms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2021

Connor Wood*
Affiliation:
Center for Mind and Culture, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. [email protected], https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Connor_Wood5

Abstract

Both Mehr et al.'s credible signaling hypothesis and Savage et al.'s music and social bonding hypothesis emphasize the role of multilevel social structures in the evolution of music. Although empirical evidence preferentially supports the social bonding hypothesis, rhythmic music may enable bonding in a way uniquely fitted to the normative and language-based character of multilevel human societies.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bovin, M. (2001). Nomads who cultivate beauty: Wod̳aab̳e dances and visual arts in Niger. Nordic Africa Institute.Google Scholar
Cross, I. (2009). The evolutionary nature of musical meaning. Musicae Scientiae, 13(2_Suppl.), 179200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864909013002091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, L., Turgeon, M., & Atherton, G. (2019). How moving together binds us together: The social consequences of interpersonal entrainment and group processes. Open Psychology, 1(1), 273302. https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W. T. (2006). The biology and evolution of music: A comparative perspective. Cognition, 100(1), 173215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujiwara, K., Kimura, M., & Daibo, I. (2020). Rhythmic features of movement synchrony for bonding individuals in dyadic interaction. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 44(1), 173193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-019-00315-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, K. R., Wood, B. M., Baggio, J., Hurtado, A. M., & Boyd, R. T. (2014). Hunter-gatherer inter-band interaction rates: Implications for cumulative culture. PLoS ONE, 9(7), e102806. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2008). Evolving intentions for social interaction: From entrainment to joint action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1499), 20212031. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mogan, R., Fischer, R., & Bulbulia, J. A. (2017). To be in synchrony or not? A meta-analysis of synchrony’s effects on behavior, perception, cognition and affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morillon, B., & Baillet, S. (2017). Motor origin of temporal predictions in auditory attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(42), E8913E8921. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705373114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pika, S., Wilkinson, R., Kendrick, K. H., & Vernes, S. C. (2018). Taking turns: Bridging the gap between human and animal communication. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1880), 20180598. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, R. A. (1968). Pigs for the ancestors: Ritual in the ecology of a new Guinea people. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Su, Y.-H., & Pöppel, E. (2012). Body movement enhances the extraction of temporal structures in auditory sequences. Psychological Research, 76(3), 373382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0346-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todd, N. P. M., & Lee, C. S. (2015). The sensory-motor theory of rhythm and beat induction 20 years on: A new synthesis and future perspectives. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2020). The moral psychology of obligation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 43, e56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X19001742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar