Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T21:12:14.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identity matters to individuals: Group assessment cannot be reduced to collective performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2016

Catherine Belzung ,
Etienne Billette de Villemeur ,
Anouk Grevin  and
Gennaro Iorio
Catherine Belzung
Affiliation:
Brain & Imaging (INSERM – UMR 930), Université François Rabelais de Tours, F-37200 [email protected]
Etienne Billette de Villemeur
Affiliation:
Lille Economie et Management (CNRS – UMR 9221) & Université de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, [email protected]
Anouk Grevin
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Economie et Management de Nantes-Atlantique, Université de Nantes, IEMN-IAE, 44322 Nantes Cedex 3, [email protected]
Gennaro Iorio
Affiliation:
Department of Political, Social and Communication Sciences, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although we agree that both identification and differentiation play a key role in explaining individual behaviour in groups, we suggest that (1) cohesion and differentiation should be better articulated, (2) the proposal carries implicit value choices that are not necessarily universal, and (3) the success of a group in shaping individual behaviour should refer to the values of individual members.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e139
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, K. J. (1951/1963) Social choice and individual values. Wiley.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1974) “From the native's point of view”: On the nature of anthropological understanding. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 28(1):26–45.Google Scholar
Jaynes, J. (1976) The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1913) Il massimo di utilità per una collettività in sociologia. Giornale degli economisti e rivista di statistica 46(4):337–41.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1916) Trattato di sociologia generale. G. Barbèra.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. & Roberts, K. H. (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative science quarterly 38(3):357–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar