Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:28:56.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formal models of “resource depletion”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2013

Hilde M. Huizenga ,
Maurits W. van der Molen ,
Anika Bexkens  and
Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg
Hilde M. Huizenga
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 XA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/h.m.huizenga/[email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/m.w.vandermolen/[email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/a.bexkens/[email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/w.p.m.vandenwildenberg/ Cognitive Science Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Maurits W. van der Molen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 XA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/h.m.huizenga/[email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/m.w.vandermolen/[email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/a.bexkens/[email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/w.p.m.vandenwildenberg/
Anika Bexkens
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 XA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/h.m.huizenga/[email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/m.w.vandermolen/[email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/a.bexkens/[email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/w.p.m.vandenwildenberg/ Cognitive Science Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 XA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/h.m.huizenga/[email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/m.w.vandermolen/[email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/a.bexkens/[email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/w.p.m.vandenwildenberg/ Cognitive Science Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The opportunity cost model (OCM) aims to explain various phenomena, among which the finding that performance degrades if executive functions are used repeatedly (“resource depletion”). We argue that an OCM account of resource depletion requires two unlikely assumptions, and we discuss an alternative that does not require these assumptions. This alternative model describes the interplay between executive function and motivation.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 6 , December 2013 , pp. 694 - 695
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boksem, M. A. S. & Tops, M. (2008) Mental fatigue: Costs and benefits. Brain Research Reviews 59(1):125–39. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.07.001.Google Scholar
Carlson, C. L. & Tamm, L. (2000) Responsiveness of children with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder to reward and response cost: Differential impact on performance and motivation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 68(1):73–83. doi:10.1037//0022-006X.68.1.73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C. & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2010a) Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 136(4):495–525. doi:10.1037/a0019486.Google Scholar
Huizenga, H. M., van der Molen, M. W., Bexkens, A., Bos, M. G. N. & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2012) Muscle or motivation? A stop-signal study on the effects of sequential cognitive control. Frontiers in Psychology 3:126. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00126.Google Scholar
Lorist, M. M., Boksem, M. A. S. & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2005) Impaired cognitive control and reduced cingulate activity during mental fatigue. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 24(2):199–205. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.018.Google Scholar
Morsella, E., Wilson, L., Berger, C., Honhongva, M., Gazzaley, A. & Bargh, J. (2009) Subjective aspects of cognitive control at different stages of processing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71(8):1807–24. doi:10.3758/APP.Google Scholar
Muraven, M. & Baumeister, R. F. (2000) Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin 126(2):247–59. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10748642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pessoa, L. (2009) How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(4):160–66. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.006.Google Scholar
Salamone, J. D. & Correa, M. (2012) The mysterious motivational functions of mesolimbic dopamine. Neuron 76(3):470–85. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.021.Google Scholar
Schultz, W., Apicella, P. & Ljungberg, T. (1993) Responses of monkey dopamine neurons to reward and conditioned stimuli during successive steps of learning a delayed response task. Journal of Neuroscience 13(3):900–13. Available at: http://www.jneurosci.org/content/13/3/900.full.pdf; Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8441015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed