No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Contributions of family social structure to the development of ultrasociality in humans
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 June 2016
Abstract
The evolution of ultrasociality in humans may have involved the evolutionarily significant mechanisms that govern family social structure in many animal species. Adverse effects of ultrasociality in humans may be mediated by maladaptive effects of modern civilization on family groups, as many of the effects on both families and societies are especially severe in dense populations made possible by agriculture.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016
References
Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. (2004) The evolution of strong reciprocity: Cooperation in heterogeneous populations. Theoretical Population Biology
65(1):17–28.Google Scholar
Champagne, F. A. (2008) Epigenetic mechanisms and the transgenerational effects of maternal care. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
29:386. (Online article).Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K., Greer, L. L., Handgraf, M. J., Shalvi, S., Van Kleer, G. A., Baas, M., Ten Velden, F. S., Van Dijk, E. & Feith, S. W. (2010) The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science
328(5984):1408–11.Google Scholar
Fouks, B., d'Ettorre, P. & Nehring, V. (2011) Brood adoption in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex echinatior: Adaptation or recognition noise?
Insectes Sociaux
58(4):479–85.Google Scholar
Goodman, S. H., Rouse, M. H., Connell, A. M., Broth, M. R., Hall, C. M. & Heywood, D. (2011) Maternal depression and child psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
14(1):1–27.Google Scholar
Hill, K. R., Walker, R. S., Božičević, M., Eder, J., Headland, T., Hewlett, B., Hurtado, A. M., Marlowe, F., Wiessner, P. & Wood, B. (2011) Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure. Science
331(6022):1286–89. doi: 10.1126/science.1199071.Google Scholar
Insel, T. R. & Young, L. J. (2000) Neuropeptides and the evolution of social behavior. Current Opinion in Neurobiology
10(6):784–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lederbogen, F., Kirsch, P., Haddad, L., Streit, F., Tost, H., Schuch, P., Wust, S., Pruessner, J. C., Rietschel, M., Deuschle, M. & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2011) City living and urban upbringing affect neural social stress processing in humans. Nature
474(7352):498–501.Google Scholar
Lopes, J. F. S., Hughes, W. O. H., Camargo, R. S. & Forti, L. C. (2005) Larval isolation and brood care in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Insectes Sociaux
52(4):333–38.Google Scholar
Nehring, V., Evison, S. E., Santorelli, L. A., d'Ettore, P. & Hughes, W. O. (2011) Kin-informative recognition cues in ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
278(1714):1942–48.Google Scholar
Peen, J., Schoevers, R. A., Schoevers, R. A., Beekman, A. T. & Dekker, J. (2010) The current status of urban-rural differences in psychiatric disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
121(2):84–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, D. R. (1993) Urbanization and human health. Parasitology
106(Suppl. 1):S93–S107.Google Scholar
Rand, D. G. & Nowak, M. A. (2013) Human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences
17(8):413–25.Google Scholar
Robertson, E., Grace, S., Wallington, T. & Stewart, D. E. (2004) Antenatal risk factors for postpartum depression: A synthesis of recent literature. General Hospital Psychiatry
26(4):289–95.Google Scholar
Schaal, B. & Porter, R. H. (2003) Olfaction and the development of social behavior in neonatal mammals. In: Handbook of olfaction and gustation, ed. Doty, R. L.. CRC Press. Available at: http://www.crcnetbase.com/isbn/9780203911457
Google Scholar
Target article
The economic origins of ultrasociality
Related commentaries (26)
Agriculture and the energy-complexity spiral
Agriculture increases individual fitness
Autonomy in ants and humans
Biological markets explain human ultrasociality
Contributions of family social structure to the development of ultrasociality in humans
Differences in autonomy of humans and ultrasocial insects
Differentiation of individual selves facilitates group-level benefits of ultrasociality
Does ultrasociality really exist – and is it the best predictor of human economic behaviors?
Human agricultural economy is, and likely always was, largely based on kinship – Why?
Human and ant social behavior should be compared in a very careful way to draw valid parallels
Humans are ultrasocial and emotional
Laying the foundation for evonomics
Malthus redux, and still blind in the same eye
On the effectiveness of multilevel selection
Rome was not built in one day: Underlying biological and cognitive factors responsible for the emergence of agriculture and ultrasociality
Social insects, merely a “fun house” mirror of human social evolution
The continuing evolution of ultrasocial economic organization
The convergent and divergent evolution of social-behavioral economics
The day of reckoning: Does human ultrasociality continue?
The similarity and difference between ant and human ultrasocieties: From the viewpoint of scaling laws
Ultrasociality and the division of cognitive labor
Ultrasociality and the sexual divisions of labor
Ultrasociality without group selection: Possible, reasonable, and likely
Ultrasociality, class, threat, and intentionality in human society
Ultrasociality: When institutions make a difference
“If it looks like a duck…” – why humans need to focus on different approaches than insects if we are to become efficiently and effectively ultrasocial
Author response
Disengaging from the ultrasocial economy: The challenge of directing evolutionary change