Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T21:07:00.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Considering the role of ecology on individual differentiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2016

Tomás Cabeza de Baca
Affiliation:
Health Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA [email protected]://profiles.ucsf.edu/tommy.cabezadebaca
Rafael Antonio Garcia
Affiliation:
Ethology and Evolutionary Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ [email protected]@u.arizona.eduhttp://www.psychology.arizona.edu/user/rafael-garciahttp://www.u.arizona.edu/~ajf/index.html
Michael Anthony Woodley of Menie
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Germany [email protected] Center Leo Apostel for Interdisciplinary Studies, Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium.
Aurelio José Figueredo
Affiliation:
Ethology and Evolutionary Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ [email protected]@u.arizona.eduhttp://www.psychology.arizona.edu/user/rafael-garciahttp://www.u.arizona.edu/~ajf/index.html

Abstract

Our commentary articulates some of the commonalities between Baumeister et al.'s theory of socially differentiated roles and Strategic Differentiation-Integration Effort. We expand upon the target article's position by arguing that differentiating social roles is contextual and driven by varying ecological pressures, producing character displacement not only among individuals within complex societies, but also across social systems and multiple levels of organization.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. D. (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5:325–83.Google Scholar
Armstrong, E. L., Fernandes, H. B. F. & Woodley, M. A. (2014) SD-IE and other differentiation effects in Italy and Spain. Personality and Individual Differences 68:189–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L. & Draper, P. (1991) Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development 62:647–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabeza de Baca, T. & Figueredo, A. J. (2014) The cognitive ecology of Mexico: Climatic and socio-cultural effects on life history strategy and general cognitive ability. Intelligence 47:6371. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2014.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabeza de Baca, T., Figueredo, A. J. & Ellis, B. J. (2012) An evolutionary analysis of variation in parental effort: Determinants and assessment. Parenting: Science and Practice 12:94104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, B. J., Figueredo, A. J., Brumbach, B. H. & Schlomer, G. L. (2009) Mechanisms of environmental risk: The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Human Nature 20:204–68.Google Scholar
Fernandes, H. B. F. & Woodley, M. A. (2013) Strategic differentiation and integration among the 50 states of the USA. Personality and Individual Differences 55:10001002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueredo, A. J. & Jacobs, W. J. (2010) Aggression, risk-taking, and alternative life history strategies: The behavioral ecology of social deviance. In: Bio-psycho-social perspectives on interpersonal violence, ed. Frias-Armenta, M. & Corral-Verdugo, V., pp. 328. Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Patch, E. A. & Gómez Ceballos, E. (2015) A life history approach to the dynamics of social selection. In: Evolutionary perspectives on social psychology, ed. Zeigler-Hill, V., Welling, L. & Shackelford, T. K., pp. 364–72. Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Schneider, S. M. R., Sefcek, J. A., Tal, I. R., Hill, D., Wenner, C. J. & Jacobs, W. J. (2006) Consilience and life history theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review 26:243–75.Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Woodley, M. A., Brown, S. D. & Ross, K. C. (2013) Multiple successful test of the strategic differentiation-integration effort (SD-IE) hypothesis. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology 7:361–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Hurtado, A. M. & Lancaster, J. (2001) The embodied capital theory of human evolution. In: Reproductive ecology and human evolution, ed. Ellison, P. T., pp. 293317. Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H. S. & Gangestad, S. W. (2005) Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In: Handbook of evolutionary psychology, ed. Buss, D. M., pp. 6895. Wiley.Google Scholar
Lancaster, J. B. & Kaplan, H. S. (2009) The endocrinology of the human adaptive complex. In: Endocrinology of social relationships, ed. Ellison, P. T. & Gray, P. G. , pp. 95119. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stearns, S. C., Allal, N. & Mace, R. (2008) Life history theory and human development. In: Foundations of evolutionary psychology, ed. Crawford, C. & Krebs, D., pp. 4769. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Woodley, M. A. (2011) The cognitive differentiation-integration effort hypothesis: A synthesis between the fitness indicator and life history models of human intelligence. Review of General Psychology 15:228–45.Google Scholar
Woodley, M. A. & Fernandes, H. B. F. (2014) Strategic and cognitive differentiation-integration effort in a study of 76 countries. Personality and Individual Differences 57:37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodley, M. A., Fernandes, H. B. F. & Madison, G. (2014) Strategic differentiation-integration effort amongst the 47 prefectures of Japan. Personality and Individual Differences 63:6468.Google Scholar
Woodley, M. A., Figueredo, A. J., Brown, S. D. & Ross, K. C. (2013) Four successful tests of the cognitive differentiation-integration effort hypothesis. Intelligence 41:832–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar