Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:03:09.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bifocalism is in the eye of the beholder: Social learning as a developmental response to the accuracy of others' mentalizing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2022

Chloe Campbell Open the ORCID record for Chloe Campbell [Opens in a new window]  and
Peter Fonagy Open the ORCID record for Peter Fonagy [Opens in a new window]
Chloe Campbell
Affiliation:
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK [email protected]://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychoanalysis/people/chloe-campbell
Peter Fonagy
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, London WC1H OAP, UK [email protected]://www.ucl.ac.uk/pals/people/peter-fonagy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This commentary argues the case for developmental psychopathology in understanding social learning. Informed by work on “epistemic disruption,” we have described difficulties with social learning associated with many forms of psychopathology. Epistemic disruption manifests in an inability to move between innovation and conformity, and arises from poor mentalizing, which generates difficulties in identifying social cues that trigger the correct stance.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e254
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, R. C., Plener, P. L., Groen, G., Neff, D., Bonenberger, M., & Abler, B. (2017). Differential neural processing of social exclusion and inclusion in adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury and young adults with borderline personality disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 8, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, C., Tanzer, M., Saunders, R., Booker, T., Allison, E., Li, E., … Fonagy, P. (2021). Development and validation of a self-report measure of epistemic trust. PLoS ONE, 16(4), e0250264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fonagy, P., Allison, E., & Campbell, C. (2019). Mentalizing, resilience, and epistemic trust. In Bateman, A. & Fonagy, P. (Eds.), Handbook of mentalizing in mental health practice (2nd ed., pp. 63–77). American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P., Campbell, C., Constantinou, M., Higgitt, A., Allison, E., & Luyten, P. (2021). Culture and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 1–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. L., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. Other Press.Google Scholar
Fonagy, P., & Luyten, P. (2009). A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 21(4), 1355–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., & Allison, E. (2015). Epistemic petrification and the restoration of epistemic trust: A new conceptualization of borderline personality disorder and its psychosocial treatment. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29(5), 575–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (2007). Playing with reality: IV. A theory of external reality rooted in intersubjectivity. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88(4), 917–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergely, G, & Watson, J. S. (1996). The social biofeedback theory of parental affect-mirroring: The development of emotional self-awareness and self-control in infancy. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77(6), 1181–1212.Google ScholarPubMed
Hanegraaf, L., van Baal, S., Hohwy, J., & Verdejo-Garcia, A. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of “systems for social processes” in borderline personality and substance use disorders. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 127, 572–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahr, J., & Csibra, G. (2017). Why do we remember? The communicative function of episodic memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, 1–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2017). The enigma of reason: A new theory of human understanding. Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., Clement, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25(4), 359–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar