Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:52:53.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Activation of stance by cues, or attunement to the invariants in a populated environment?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2022

Tetsushi Nonaka Open the ORCID record for Tetsushi Nonaka [Opens in a new window]
Tetsushi Nonaka*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan [email protected] http://www2.kobe-u.ac.jp/~tnonaka/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While I agree with the distinction between expedient and proper ways of action, I find Jagiello et al.'s account of “stance switching” debatable. Fundamental to theories of cultural evolution is the fact that the shared environment is indefinitely rich, in which individuals are provided with opportunities for learning to tune themselves to specific affordances that are relevant to emerging situations.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e263
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gesell, A., & Ilg, F. L. (1937). Feeding behavior of infants. Lippincott.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1950). The implications of learning theory for social psychology. In Miller, J. G. (Ed.), Experiments in social process: A symposium on social psychology (pp. 149–167). McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (1973). Techniques of the body. Economy and Society, 2, 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147300000003 (Original work published 1935 in Journal de Psychologie Normal et Pathologique, 32, 271–293).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisser, U. (1988). Five kinds of self-knowledge. Philosophical Psychology, 1(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515088808572924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nonaka, T., & Goldfield, E. C. (2018). Mother–infant interaction in the emergence of a tool-using skill at mealtime: A process of affordance selection. Ecological Psychology, 30(3), 278–298. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2018.1438199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nonaka, T. (in press). Towards an ecology of evolving skills. In Wynn, T., Overmann, K. A., & Coolidge, F. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of cognitive archaeology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192895950.001.0001Google Scholar
Nonaka, T., & Stoffregen, T. A. (2020). Social interaction in the emergence of toddler's mealtime spoon use. Developmental Psychobiology, 62(8), 1124–1133. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21978CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, E. S. (1993). The intention to use a specific affordance: A conceptual framework for psychology. In Wozniak, R. H. & Fischer, K. W. (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 45–76). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Reed, E. S. (1996). Encountering the world: Toward an ecological psychology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rietveld, E. (2008). Situated normativity: The normative aspect of embodied cognition in unreflective action. Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy, 117(468), 973–1001. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzn050CrossRefGoogle Scholar