Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T09:07:18.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond autism: Challenging unexamined assumptions about social motivation in typical development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2019

Karen Bartsch Open the ORCID record for Karen Bartsch [Opens in a new window]  and
David Estes Open the ORCID record for David Estes [Opens in a new window]
Karen Bartsch
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071-3415. [email protected] [email protected]://www.uwyo.edu/psychology/faculty/bartsch.htmlhttp://www.uwyo.edu/psychology/faculty/estes.html
David Estes
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071-3415. [email protected] [email protected]://www.uwyo.edu/psychology/faculty/bartsch.htmlhttp://www.uwyo.edu/psychology/faculty/estes.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In challenging the assumption of autistic social uninterest, Jaswal & Akhtar have opened the door to scrutinizing similar unexamined assumptions embedded in other literatures, such as those on children's typically developing behaviors regarding others’ minds and morals. Extending skeptical analysis to other areas may reveal new approaches for evaluating competing claims regarding social interest in autistic individuals.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e83
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartsch, K. & Wellman, H. (1989) Young children's attribution of action to beliefs and desires. Child Development 60(4):946–64. doi:10.2307/1131035.Google Scholar
Bartsch, K., Campbell, M. D. & Troseth, G. L. (2007) Why else does Jenny run? Young children's extended psychological explanations. Journal of Cognition and Development 8(1):33–61. doi:10.1080/15248370709336992.Google Scholar
Dahl, A., Gingo, M., Uttich, K. & Turiel, E. (2018) Moral reasoning about human welfare in adolescents and adults: Judging conflicts involving sacrificing and saving lives. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 83:i–109. Available at: https://doi/org/10.1111/mono.12374.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N. (2000) Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology 51:665–97. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L. & Morris, A. (2014) Empathy-related responding in children. In Handbook of moral development (2nd ed.), ed. Killen, M. & Smetana, J., pp. 184–207. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Fabricius, W. V. & Khalil, S., L. (2003) False beliefs or false positives? Limits on children's understanding of mental representations. Journal of Cognition and Development 4(3):239–62. doi:10.1207/S15327647JCD0403_01.Google Scholar
Gelman, S. A. (2003) The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamlin, J. K. & Wynn, K. (2011) Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others. Cognitive Development 26(1):30–39. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.09.001.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. L. (2000) Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Medin, D. L. & Ortony, A. (1989) Psychological essentialism. In Similarity and analogical reasoning, ed. Vosniadou, S. & Ortony, A., pp. 179–96. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar