Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T09:13:48.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adaptive behaviour and predictive processing accounts of autism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2019

Kelsey Perrykkad*
Affiliation:
Cognition & Philosophy Lab, Philosophy Department, School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia. [email protected]://cog-phil-lab.org/people/kelsey-perrykkad/

Abstract

Many autistic behaviours can rightly be classified as adaptive, but why these behaviours differ from adaptive neurotypical behaviours in the same environment requires explanation. I argue that predictive processing accounts best explain why autistic people engage different adaptive responses to the environment and, further, account for evidence left unexplained by the social motivation theory.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ben-Sasson, A., Hen, L., Fluss, R., Cermak, S. A., Engel-Yeger, B. & Gal, E. (2009) A meta-analysis of sensory modulation symptoms in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 39(1):111.Google Scholar
Brock, J. (2012) Alternative Bayesian accounts of autistic perception: Comment on Pellicano and Burr. Autism 14:209–24.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. & Greiling, H. (1999) Adaptive individual differences. Journal of Personality 67(2):209–43.Google Scholar
Constant, A., Bervoets, J., Hens, K. & Cruys, S. V. d. (2018) Precise worlds for certain minds: An ecological perspective on the relational self in autism. Topoi. doi:10.1007/s11245-018-9546-4.Google Scholar
Coulter, W. A. & Morrow, H. W. (1978) Adaptive behavior: Concepts and measurements: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Friston, K. J. (2017) Precision psychiatry. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging 2(8):640–43. doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.08.007.Google Scholar
Friston, K. J., Stephan, K. E., Montague, R. & Dolan, R. J. (2014) Computational psychiatry: the brain as a phantastic organ. The Lancet Psychiatry 1(2):148–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70275-5.Google Scholar
Lawson, R. P., Mathys, C. & Rees, G. (2017) Adults with autism overestimate the volatility of the sensory environment. Nature Neuroscience 20:1293–99. doi:10.1038/nn.4615.Google Scholar
Lawson, R. P., Rees, G. & Friston, K. J. (2014) An aberrant precision account of autism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:302. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00302.Google Scholar
Meilleur, A.-A. S., Jelenic, P. & Mottron, L. (2015) Prevalence of clinically and empirically defined talents and strengths in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 45(5):1354–67. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2296-2.Google Scholar
Montague, P. R., Dolan, R. J., Friston, K. J. & Dayan, P. (2012) Computational psychiatry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16(1):7280. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.018.Google Scholar
Palmer, C. J., Lawson, R. P. & Hohwy, J. (2017) Bayesian approaches to autism: Towards volatility, action, and behavior. Psychological Bulletin 143(5):521–42. doi: 10.1037/bul0000097.Google Scholar
Pellicano, E. & Burr, D. (2012) When the world becomes ‘too real’: A Bayesian explanation of autistic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16(10):504–10. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.08.009.Google Scholar
Sohn, D. (1976) Two concepts of adaptation: Darwin's and psychology's. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 12(4):367–75.Google Scholar
Van de Cruys, S., Evers, K., Van der Hallen, R., Van Eylen, L., Boets, B., de-Wit, L. & Wagemans, J. (2014) Precise minds in uncertain worlds: Predictive processing in autism. Psychological Review 121(4):649.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (1998) Adaptive individual differences within single populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 353(1366):199205.Google Scholar