Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:06:01.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acknowledging the diversity of aesthetic experiences: Effects of style, meaning, and context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2013

Helmut Leder
Helmut Leder*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Basic Research, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria. [email protected]://www.univie.ac.at/en/university/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Art can be experienced in numerous ways, ranging from sensory pleasure to elaborated ways of finding meaning (Leder et al. 2004). However, rather ignored by Bullot & Reber (B&R), in empirical aesthetics several lines of research have studied how knowledge of artistic style, descriptive and elaborate information, expertise, and context all affect aesthetic experiences from art. Limiting aesthetics to rather rare experiences unnecessarily narrows the scope of a science of art.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 149 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Augustin, D. & Leder, H. (2006) Art expertise: A study of concepts and conceptual spaces. Psychology Science 48:135–57.Google Scholar
Belke, B., Leder, H. & Augustin, D. (2006) Mastering style. Effects of explicit style-related information, art knowledge and affective state on appreciation of abstract paintings. Psychology Science 48:115–35.Google Scholar
Cupchik, G. C. (1992) From perception to production: A multi-level analysis of the aesthetic process. In: Emerging visions of the aesthetic process: Psychology, semiology, philosophy, ed. Cupchik, G. C. & Laszlo, J., pp. 83–99. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cupchik, G. C., Vartanian, O., Crawley, A. & Mikulis, D. J. (2009) Viewing artworks: Contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic response. Brain and Cognition 70:84–91.Google Scholar
Kirk, U., Skov, M., Hulme, O., Christensen, M. S. & Zeki, S. (2009b) Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: An fMRI study. NeuroImage 44(3):1125–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.009. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811908011099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreitler, H. & Kreitler, S. (1972) The psychology of the arts. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A. & Augustin, D. (2004) A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology 95:489–508. DOI: 10.1348/0007126042369811.Google Scholar
Leder, H., Carbon, C.-C. & Ripsas, A.-L. (2006) Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychologica 121(2):176–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005.Google Scholar
Leder, H., Gerger, G., Dressler, S. G. & Schabmann, A. (2012) How art is appreciated. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 6:1–10.Google Scholar
Millis, K. & Larson, M. (2008) Applying the construction–integration framework to aesthetic responses to representational artworks. Discourse Processes 45:263–87.Google Scholar
Millis, K. (2001) Making meaning brings pleasure: The influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion, 3:320–29. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiner, L. (2001) The invention of art. A cultural history. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar