As the discussion of historical facts, especially such as relate to the affairs of our island, falls in with the design of your institution, I beg leave to present you with an enquiry into the nature of the death of that unfortunate prince king John, it having been attributed by some of our later chronicles to the effects of poison. After the declaration of Mons. Rapin, “that the story of the poison is very improbable, since it is not mentioned by any of the contemporary historians;” to which his learned annotator, who, I presume, was the late Mr. Philip Morant, has added, “that the poison is not mentioned by any “historian that lived within sixty years of the time,” or before A. D. 1276, one would imagine there could be no occasion for re-considering this point: but the late Mr. John Lewis of Margate, partly in vindication of his favourite William Caxton, and partly from the forwardness of his zeal against Popery, has endeavoured to puzzle the cause, and to invalidate the assertions of the judicious Frenchman, and his learned English annotator; so that it is become absolutely necessary to review this particle of our history, and to bring it to a new hearing.