Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T06:50:34.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of brown trout (Salmo trutta) reared in fresh water and sea water to freshwater rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): I. Growth and nitrogen balance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 1997

Antoine Dosdat
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physiologie des Poissons, IFREMER, BP 70, 29280 Plouzané, France Present address: IFREMER, Station de Palavas, Chemin de Maguelone, 34250 Palavas-les- Flots, France
Robert Métailler
Affiliation:
Laboratoire mixte de Nutrition des Poissons, IFREMER-INRA, BP 70, 29280 plouzané, France
Elisabeth Desbruyères
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physiologie des Poissons, IFREMER, BP 70, 29280 Plouzané, France
Christine Huelvan
Affiliation:
Laboratoire mixte de Nutrition des Poissons, IFREMER-INRA, BP 70, 29280 plouzané, France
Get access

Abstract

Brown trout and rainbow trout (average weight 100 g) were reared in fresh water at 12 °C under the same conditions before transfer of brown trout to sea water, in order to compare nitrogen utilisation in the two species. Apparent protein digestibility (ADC), nitrogen (ammonia and urea) excretion, protein productive value (PPV) and actual observed nitrogen mass balance were determined. Rainbow trout raised in fresh water had a higher growth rate (1.1 vs 0.8%.d−1), better food conversion ratio (0.7 vs 1.0), better ADC (91 vs 85%) and PPV (45 vs 35%) and lower ammonia excretion rates than brown trout reared in fresh water. Transferring brown trout to sea water induced lower PPV (30%) and ammonia and urea excretion. Salinity did not modify metabolic efficiency in brown trout. Fat content was higher in brown trout (7.7-8.9% ww) than in rainbow trout (5.7-7.6% ww). Nitrogen mass balance indicated that compounds other than ammonia and urea were produced in higher quantities by seawater brown trout. Behaviour, less domestication and specific ability to utilise protein could explain the differences between the two species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© IFREMER-Gauthier-Villars, 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)