Background: Appropriate antibiotic use has been described as one of the key strategies in tackling antibiotic resistance. Although the majority of antimicrobial therapy is completed following discharge, there lacks clear guidance in addressing antibiotic stewardship in the outpatient setting. Particularly, broader coverage as well as longer durations of therapy are often encountered following hospitalization. In our study we examine the various antibiotic prescribing practices on hospital discharge for management of urinary tract infections (UTI). Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective observational chart review of patients discharged from St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center in Hartford between May and July 2022. Medical records were reviewed for patients who were prescribed antibiotic therapy for management of UTI and met inclusion criteria. Variables of interest included type of UTI treated, antibiotic used, duration of antibiotics during and following hospitalization, fluoroquinolone use, as well reported adverse events. Total duration of therapy was defined as days on susceptible antimicrobials with appropriate source control. Results: A total of 84 patients met inclusion criteria. 44 received treatment for simple UTI (sUTI) and 40 for complicated UTI (cUTI). Figure 1 shows the various organisms identified on culture. The most common antimicrobials prescribed on discharge were cefpodoxime and ciprofloxacin [figure 2]. Quinolones were prescribed in 11.4% of sUTIs and 39.1% of cUTIs on hospital discharge. Of those, only one patient had no alternative to quinolone use due to drug allergies. The mean duration of therapy for treatment of sUTI was 6.4 days total (SD 2.40) with 3.9 days outpatient (SD 1.78). The mean duration of therapy for treatment of cUTI was 10.9 days total (SD 3.62) with 6.7 days outpatient (SD 2.99). Comparison of mean durations is shown in figure 3. In 49% of all cases (including both sUTI and cUTI) patients received greater than 7 days of antimicrobial therapy. Conclusion: There is increased evidence favoring shorter courses of antimicrobial therapy for management of both simple and complicated UTIs. A 7-day course has been shown as effective duration of therapy for cUTI with appropriate source control, regardless of presence of bacteremia. Results from our single center-study show both sUTI and cUTI are subject to unnecessarily prolonged durations of therapy on hospital discharge. In addition we noted a significant use of fluoroquinolones in cUTI treatment. We believe stewardship interventions at time of discharge may particularly benefit shorter courses of therapy for cUTI as well as reduced quinolone use.

We performed a knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) survey of bedside nurses to evaluate perceptions of antimicrobial use and aid in the design of nursing-based antimicrobial stewardship interventions. The survey highlighted discrepancies in knowledge and practice as well as opportunities to improve communication with nursing colleagues.

Background: In 2023, Nebraska held its 4th state antimicrobial stewardship (AS) educational conference, an annual one-day in-person event with continuing education offered for nurses, pharmacists, microbiology lab technicians, and physicians. One challenge of educational events is determining if content has been translated into practice. We sought to assess AS-related practice changes implemented by conference attendees. Methods: Conference attendees were sent 2 surveys by email following the conference. Survey 1 questions were integrated into the continuing education credit evaluation immediately following the conference. Survey 2 was sent three months later to all registered attendees. Qualitative responses were grouped by theme and descriptive statistics were used to evaluate Results: There were 203 attendees from across the state including a diverse group of learners (Table 1) representing metropolitan and rural areas of Nebraska (Figure 1) from acute care hospitals, critical access hospitals, long-term care settings, and public health. A total of 148 attendees (73%) answered questions in Survey 1 (Table 2), and 79 (39%) attendees responded to Survey 2. On Survey 1, 94% of respondents indicated that they intended to make practice changes, though 60% anticipated barriers including further staff training needs and lack of resources and health system support. On Survey 2, 83% of respondents indicated successful implementation of practice changes at three months after the conference. The most common practice changes included enhanced communication strategies, improved antibiotic tracking, monitoring, and review, policy and procedure updates, and AS tool implementation. On Survey 1, 26% (35/131) strongly agreed that their ability to treat patients was adequate prior to the conference; this increased to 55% (72/131) post-conference. On Survey 2, 56% (22/39) of respondents reported improvement in patient outcomes because of implemented practice changes following conference attendance. However, some also mentioned a short follow-up survey timeline as a limitation in assessing patient outcome improvements. Reported outcomes included improved receptiveness from providers, patients, and families to antibiotic use recommendations, shorter prescribed durations, and more appropriate initial antibiotic selection. Improved team performance was noted by 73% (27/37) of respondents. Themes included improved communication with internal and external stakeholders, more collaborative team discussions, increased confidence in recommendations, expanded provider and staff engagement, and increased leadership involvement. Conclusions: In addition to improved knowledge and understanding for a variety of AS-related areas, attendees of the conference also reported a high rate of practice changes that led to perceived improvements in patient outcomes and team function.

We conducted a retrospective study to assess performance of provider-selected antibiotic indication (PSI) in identifying hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia. PSI showed moderate sensitivity (64.4%) and high specificity (96.3%). PSI has potential utility for targeted real-time antibiotic stewardship interventions, though future research should investigate methods to improve sensitivity.

Background: Tracking antimicrobial use (AU) is a Core Element of Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs and important to help curb the public health threat of antimicrobial resistance. The National Healthcare Safety Network’s (NHSN) AU Option serves as a way for facilities, healthcare systems, and health departments to track and report AU rates within their jurisdictions. Many analyses at the state and national levels do not assess unit-level AU rates. This study investigates AU rates among patient care units in Tennessee reporting facilities from 2015 to 2023 and the most frequently used antimicrobial agents based on AU rates within select unit types. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted utilizing data obtained from the NHSN AU Option for inpatient units in Tennessee acute care hospitals. Units were defined as critical care (including neonatal), ward, oncology ward, stepdown, operating room (OR), and mixed acuity and specialty care areas, termed ‘other’. Unit types with fewer than five facilities represented were excluded. AU rates were determined by Antimicrobial Days of Therapy (DOT) per 1000 Days Present (DP). Statistical analyses , including descriptive statistics and comparison among the units by ANOVA test , were calculated using SAS Version 9.4. Results: Eighty-three facilities reported at least one month of data into the NHSN AU Option between 2015–2023. Among 70 facilities reporting inpatient units, the highest AU rate was observed in oncology ward units (n=12, 1114.6 DOT/1000 DP). A significant difference in AU rates was observed between oncology ward units compared to different unit types (p < 0 .001). Vancomycin, ceftriaxone, and piperacillin/tazobactam were the most used antimicrobials with AU rates of 83, 76, and 65 DOT/1000 DP, respectively. Vancomycin AU rates were significantly higher in oncology ward units compared to stepdown, ward, other, and OR units (p < 0 .0001). Ceftriaxone AU rate was significantly higher in stepdown units compared to oncology ward, other, and OR units (p < 0 .0001). Piperacillin/tazobactam AU rate was significantly higher in critical care units compared to different unit types (p < 0 .0001). Conclusion: During the study period, the AU rate varied across hospital inpatient units in Tennessee, with the highest AU rate in oncology wards. This unit-specific approach is critical to address the diverse antimicrobial prescribing behaviors observed, indicating that interventions should be customized to each unit’s distinct antimicrobial usage patterns for successful stewardship efforts. Targeted strategies focused on individual wards rather than facility-wide initiatives appear essential for effective reduction in antibiotic usage.

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remains a crucial, healthcare issue for which many countries have devised a national action plan. In Japan as well, antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) are being implemented in acute care hospitals under this policy framework. Clinical pharmacists play a central role in ASP, often jointly with infectious disease (ID) physicians. However, in Japan, a shortage of ID physicians has resulted in some ASP being led solely by pharmacists. While reports of the short-term effects of this situation are emerging, the long-term impact of pharmacist-led ASP is still largely unknown in Japan. The present study retrospectively examined the long-term effects of pharmacist-led ASP in a small, Japanese, acute care hospital. Method: The present study examined a pharmacist-led ASP in an acute care hospital (287 beds) in Japan which was launched in August 2015 and assessed the duration of therapy per 1000 patient-days (DOT) as the primary outcome by comparing the pre-intervention period (April 2013-July 2015) with the intervention period (August 2015-March 2023) using linear regression analysis. Additionally, segmented time-series analysis was conducted for each, additional intervention, and the impact of reduced activity due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic during the intervention. The DOT at the study center were compared with the national average of facilities implementing ASP. Result: While the DOT for all intravenous antimicrobials showed a slight increase on linear regression (r=0.01; P=0.1), the DOT of antipseudomonal intravenous antimicrobials significantly decreased (r=-0.027; P < 0 .01). Moreover, a significant reduction in DOT was observed immediately after the initiation of prospective review and feedback for carbapenems and daily prospective review and feedback for all intravenous antimicrobials (-3.2 and -2.4; P < 0 .001 for the intercept). An increase in DOT was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic-related reduction in activity time, and a rapid decline was observed upon the resumption of activities. Conversely, the average, nationwide DOT significantly increased for all intravenous antimicrobials as well as for antipseudomonal intravenous antimicrobials (r=0.02 and r=0.004; P < 0 .01) Conclusion: Sustaining an effective, pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship program led to a continual decrease in the DOT of antipseudomonal intravenous antimicrobials in a small, Japanese, acute care hospital despite a nationwide increase in their use following implementation of the national AMR action plan. Detailed analysis of pharmacists’ activities across multiple facilities is necessary to verify these effects.

The antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance landscape in the United States consists of a data flow that starts in the clinical setting and is maintained by a network of national and state public health laboratories. These organizations are well established, with robust methodologies to test and confirm antimicrobial susceptibility. Still, the bridge that guides the flow of data is often one directional and caught in a constant state of rush hour that can only be refined with improvements to infrastructure and automation in the data flow. Moreover, there is an absence of information in the literature explaining the processes clinical laboratories use to coalesce and share susceptibility test data for AMR surveillance, further complicated by variability in testing procedures. This knowledge gap limits our understanding of what is needed to improve and streamline data sharing from clinical to public health laboratories. Successful models of AMR surveillance display attributes like 2-way communication between clinical and public health laboratories, centralized databases, standardized data, and the use of electronic health records or data systems, highlighting areas of opportunity and improvement. This article explores the roles and processes of the organizations involved in AMR surveillance in the United States and identifies current knowledge gaps and opportunities to improve communication between them through standardization, communication, and modernization of data flow.

Background: Data on antimicrobial use at the national level is crucial to establish domestic antimicrobial stewardship policies and enable medical institutions to benchmark against each other. This study aimed to analyze antimicrobial use in Korean hospitals. Methods: We investigated the antimicrobials prescribed in Korean hospitals between 2018 and 2021, using data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment. Primary care hospitals (PCHs), secondary care hospitals (SCHs), and tertiary care hospitals (TCHs) were included in this analysis. Antimicrobials were categorized according to the Korea National Antimicrobial Use Analysis System (KONAS) classification, which is suitable for measuring antimicrobial use in Korean hospitals. Results: Out of more than 1,900 hospitals, PCHs and TCHs represented the largest and lowest percentage of hospitals, respectively. The most frequently prescribed antimicrobial in 2021 was piperacillin/β-lactamase inhibitor (9.3%) in TCHs, ceftriaxone (11.0%) in SCHs, and cefazedone (18.9%) in PCHs. Between 2018 and 2021, the most used antimicrobial class according to the KONAS classification was ‘broad-spectrum antibacterial agents predominantly used for community-acquired infections’ in TCHs and SCHs, and 'narrow spectrum beta-lactam agents' in PCH. Total consumption of antimicrobials has decreased from 951.7 to 929.9 days of therapy (DOT)/1,000 patient-days in TCHs and from 817.8 to 752.2 DOT/1,000 patient-days in SCHs during study period, but not in PCHs (from 504.3 to 527.2 DOT/1,000 patient-days). Moreover, in 2021, while use of reserve antimicrobials has decreased from 13.6 to 10.7 DOT/1,000 patient-days in TCHs and from 4.6 to 3.3 DOT/1,000 patient-days in SCHs, it has increased from 0.7 to 0.8 DOT/1,000 patient-days in PCHs. Conclusion: This study confirms that antimicrobial use differs by hospital type in Korea. Recent increases of use of antimicrobials, including reserve antimicrobials, in PCHs reflect the challenges that must be addressed.

Background: CAP is often inappropriately treated with agents active against multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO; methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA] and P. aeruginosa [PSA]) and for prolonged duration. We assessed the relationship between antibiotic use with ATS/IDSA guideline-unjustified empiric and definitive MDRO therapy and prolonged duration in non-ICU inpatients with CAP at 105 VA Medical Centers. Methods: From VA Corporate Data Warehouse data, we identified patients with discharge ICD-10-CM codes consistent with CAP from 1/2022-3/2023, excluding cases with 14 days of antibiotic therapy, ICU admission, concurrent infections, or severe immunocompromise. We considered as jultified empiric (≤third day of hospitalization) therapy: anti-MRSA therapy for patients with prior positive MRSA cultures, anti-PSA therapy for patients with prior positive PSA cultures, and both anti-MRSA & anti-PSA therapy in patients with severe pneumonia and intravenous antibiotics in the prior 3 months. Definitive (>third day of hospitalization) anti-MDRO therapy was considered unjustified in patients who had achieved clinical stability and whose cultures did not grow MRSA or PSA. Prolonged duration (>6 days of therapy) was unjustified if patients were clinically stable or discharged by day 5. Results: The median age of the 29,260 patients was 75 (IQR 69,81); 4.6% were women. While 33% and 22% of patients received empiric or definitive MDRO therapy, such therapy was jultified in 12% and 0.5%, respectively. Median facility use of empiric and definitive MDRO therapy was 31% (IQR 25%,38%) and 20% (15%,23%), respectively (Figure 1); this use was unjustified in 89% (85%,93%) and 100% (100%,100%), respectively. Pearson’s correlation coefficient between MDRO therapy and rates of unjustified empiric and definitive MDRO therapy for CAP was 0.54 and 0.61, respectively (Figure 2). Although 99% of patients were discharged or stable by day 5, 42% received prolonged therapy. The median frequency of prolonged therapy was 39% (33%,48%); facility rates of prolonged therapy had a correlation of 0.56 with total antibiotic use and 0.46 with MDRO therapy (Figure 3). Discussion: Based on electronic documentation, we identified 1) substantial opportunities to reduce unjustified anti-MDRO therapy and the duration of therapy in hospitalized non-ICU patients with CAP; 2) a moderate correlation of unjustified anti-MDRO therapy with increased MDRO antibiotic use and of prolonged duration of therapy with increased total and MDRO antibiotic use. The correlation of lower quality prescribing with increased antibiotic use provides further impetus for tools such as dashboards (Figure 4) to assist antibiotic stewards in designing and monitoring interventions to reduce unjustified therapy.

A pharmacist-driven protocol for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nares screening and empiric vancomycin discontinuation was instituted in a community healthcare system utilizing a tele-antimicrobial stewardship program to reduce inappropriate use of vancomycin. The protocol and associated intervention resulted in a significant decrease in both vancomycin utilization and the rate of acute kidney injury.

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a serious public health threat. Overuse of antibiotics leads to the development and spread of antibiotic resistant pathogens. Antibiotics are also responsible for a high percentage of emergency department visits for adverse drug events. Despite this, ambulatory and urgent care providers often cite patient expectations as a reason for inappropriate antibiotic prescribing practices. We investigated patient and community understanding of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance to inform how they can be engaged as partners in combating antimicrobial resistance in our southwestern Virginia community. Methods: From July to September 2023, we conducted an online survey of patients and community members within the footprint of a large healthcare system in Southwest Virginia. Electronic medical records were used to randomly select and directly email the survey link to a representative sample of ambulatory patients who met criteria. Respondents were also recruited through the health system’s social media channels and through posters with quick response (QR) codes in outpatient offices. The survey used Likert scales and multiple-choice questions to understand experiences with and perceptions about antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance. We conducted a descriptive analysis of survey responses. Results: In total, 2,021 individuals completed the survey. Nearly 16% of respondents agreed with the statement “antibiotics can kill viruses” and almost 12% more were unsure. Thirty percent of respondents either agreed with or were unsure about the statement “antibiotics work on most coughs and colds”. When asked more directly about antimicrobial resistance, almost a quarter (25%) of respondents agreed with or were unsure about the statement “there is no connection between taking antibiotics and the development of resistant bacteria”. Responding to questions about possible negative effects of antibiotics, over 9% disagreed with the statement “antibiotics can kill the 'good' bacteria that normally live on the skin and in the gut” and another 19% were unsure. Similarly, over 20% disagreed with or were unsure about the statement “bacteria that do not respond to antibiotics could infect me or my family”. Reflecting on their own providers, nearly 83% of respondents trusted their doctor’s or nurse’s advice about antibiotic necessity. Conclusions: There are opportunities for patient and community engagement around antibiotic effectiveness for common viral illnesses and about the negative effects of overuse of antibiotics. Our data suggests most patients trust their providers as it relates to antibiotic prescribing and may be receptive to discussions and strategies that promote antimicrobial stewardship.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) threatens vulnerable populations in health care. Two-step testing improves specificity, avoiding over-treatment. This study analyzed inpatient records to estimate diagnostic outcomes and identify characteristics associated with treatment after discordant testing. Among discordant patients, those aged 65+ years were significantly more likely to be prescribed antibiotics (67% vs 39%).

Background: Inappropriate use of antimicrobials contributes to the growing threat of antibiotic resistance. While physicians encounter infections in virtually every facet of medical practice, research has shown that physicians have difficulty determining the need for antimicrobials and choosing the right drug. Physicians’ difficulties with antimicrobial prescribing likely begin early in medical education, yet little is known about how medical students learn to make antimicrobial choices. Our study sought to better understand how medical students learn antimicrobial decision-making, including the impact of a new learning tool introduced in the Infectious Diseases (ID) and Microbiology preclinical course. Method: From 2021-2023, we conducted 18 individual interviews with a purposive sample of medical students at the University of Michigan who had taken the preclinical ID/Microbiology course during the 2019-2021 curricular years. We asked participants how they learned to make antimicrobial decisions and how the course and clinical rotations influenced their understanding of antimicrobial choice. The six participants who took the 2021 course were additionally asked how an antimicrobial decision-making tool introduced that year impacted that process (Figure 1). The tool was adapted from prior work on antimicrobial reasoning (Abdoler et al, 2020). Participants were asked whether they remembered being introduced to the tool (approximately 18 months prior) and if they utilized it during their clinical rotations. Results were analyzed using Dedoose Software to facilitate thematic analysis. Result: Several themes emerged on analysis. Nearly all participants reflected that they learned elements of antimicrobial decision-making during clinical rotations, through observation or direct interaction with physician mentors and patients. Several participants described the preclinical period as content learning, with clinical rotations providing a space to consolidate and scaffold knowledge, as well as transfer knowledge to new situations or tasks. Of the 6 students interviewed regarding the antimicrobial decision-making tool, only one remembered it and could accurately describe its components prior to being shown the tool during the interview. Conclusion: Results suggest that participants view the preclinical ID/Microbiology course primarily as an opportunity to learn content, and perceive learning antimicrobial decision-making directly from practicing physicians in the clinical portion of medical school. An antimicrobial decision-making tool introduced during the preclinical ID/Microbiology course in 2021 did not impact students’ conceptualization of how they learned this skill. Given that practicing physicians often make antimicrobial prescribing errors, regular re-introduction of the tool during clinical rotations may help bridge preclinical antimicrobial educational content to the clinical phase of learning, counteract inappropriate antimicrobial lessons encountered clinically, and ground students' burgeoning antimicrobial prescribing skills in a logical reasoning model.

Background: Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is often treated with antibiotics despite recommendations against screening for and treating ASB in most populations. Some providers cite concern for progression of ASB to a symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) as the jultification for antibiotic use. While the 2019 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) ASB guidelines refute this concern, most evidence is derived from studies done in females, potentially limiting external validity. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of patients with ASB who received antibiotic treatment versus those who did not in a primarily male population. Methods: This is a multi-center, retrospective, cohort study conducted by the 5 sites within the Veterans Affairs MidSouth Healthcare Network. Patients with a positive urine culture (defined as cultures with a colony forming unit count >100,000) collected from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 were identified. ASB was determined via chart review using pre-determined criteria (positive culture in the absence of reported or documented signs or symptoms attributable to UTI as defined by the 2019 IDSA ASB guidelines). Additional data collected included antibiotic use, clinic visits and hospital admissions related to UTI or sepsis from a UTI. The primary outcome was the comparison of UTI incidence at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year in those untreated versus treated with antibiotics. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of admissions with sepsis from UTI and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) between the cohorts. Continuous data were analyzed using a Student’s t-test. Discrete data were analyzed using either a Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test. Results: The study population was primarily elderly (73 years, range 27-99 years) and male (79.7%). Of the 281 patients with ASB, 127 (45.2%) and 154 (54.8%) were untreated and treated, respectively. The incidence of UTI was 3% versus 1% (p = 0.41) at 30 days, 10% versus 12% (p = 0.61) at 6 months and 11% versus 12% (p = 0.94) at 12 months in the untreated and treated cohorts, respectively. There was no difference in admissions for UTI, sepsis from UTI or ADRs at 30 days. Conclusion: This study found no difference in the development of symptomatic UTI in veterans with untreated ASB compared to those treated with antibiotics. These findings align with current ASB guideline recommendations and support avoidance of unnecessary antibiotic use in the veteran population.

Background: Longer courses of antibiotics can be associated with antimicrobial resistance and adverse effects. Randomized clinical trials support treating gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSI) for a shorter duration with a consensus that a seven-day course of antibiotics is appropriate for uncomplicated GN-BSI. Prior to the implementation of a GN-BSI treatment guideline at our institution, we aimed to evaluate the characteristics of patients with GN-BSI and the duration of antibiotic therapy (DOT). Method: We retrospectively reviewed adult inpatients who had a blood culture with at least 1 gram-negative organism within 6 months (November 2022 to April 2023). Patients were excluded if they had a concomitant gram-positive bloodstream infection or if they were transitioned to comfort-focused care within 48 hours of their first positive blood culture. Complicated GN-BSI was defined as exhibiting any of the following: involvement of bone, joint, endovascular system, or foreign body, an inability to achieve source control, immunocompromised status, or failure to demonstrate clinical improvement or culture clearance within 72 hours. The primary outcome of this study was the mean DOT in patients with GN-BSI. Result: 100 patients met the inclusion criteria. Escherichia coli, identified in 54 cases, emerged as the most frequent organism. Urine (41) was the predominant source of bacteremia. Cefepime (48) was the most common empiric agent used. Of the 91 patients with available ceftriaxone susceptibility results, 84% had a susceptible organism. Amongst the 51 patients classified as having a complicated GN-BSI, the leading reason was immunosuppression. Table 1 presents a comparative analysis of complicated vs. uncomplicated GN-BSI. The average DOT for complicated GN-BSI was longer than the uncomplicated infections (20 vs. 11 days, P < 0 .005). Additionally, fewer patients transitioned to oral therapy in the complicated group (33% vs. 67%, P < 0 .005). Conclusion: At our institution, patients with uncomplicated GN-BSI have a shorter DOT and are more likely to transition to oral therapy than those with complicated GN-BSI. However, the mean DOT for uncomplicated infections remained longer than seven days and a large number of uncomplicated GN-BSI patients did not transition to oral therapy, indicating room for improvement in local practice through antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.