Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:18:44.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships between egg size, body weight and pelvic dimensions in turkeys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. M. Hocking
P. M. Hocking
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Edinburgh Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
Get access

Abstract

Females of four strains of commercial turkeys, including one large strain with a characteristically high rate of oviducal prolapse, were given food either ad libitum or controlled to reach proportionately 0·8 or 0·6 of the body weight of birds fed ad libitum at 24 weeks of age. Two pens of five turkeys from each treatment were photostimulated at 24 and 30 weeks of age. Each turkey was autopsied after it had laid its first egg. The relationships between egg weight and body weight, and between the weight of abdominal fat, diameter of the vent and distance between the pubic bones and egg weight were studied by regression analysis. Egg weight was a function of body weight raised to the power 0·29 which was significantly different from the allometric relationship for Galliform species of 0·64. There was no evidence that differences existed in the quantity of abdominal fat which could impede oviposition and contribute to oviducal prolapse. There were strain differences in the diameter of the vent and distance between the pubic bones in relation to egg weight but the smallest and largest strains were similar. It was concluded that artificial selection had changed the species relationship between egg weight and body mass and that the susceptibility to oviducal prolapse in sire line turkeys was probably physiological in origin.

Keywords

allometrybody weightegg massprolapseturkeys
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , February 1993 , pp. 145 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burmester, B. R. 1942. The influence of sex hormones upon the occurrence of prolapse in chickens. Poultry Science 27: 745–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, N. A. and Tullett, S. G. 1991. Variation in the eggs of poultry species. In Avian incubation (ed. Tullet, S. G.), pp. 59–77. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Gilbert, A. B. and Wells, J. W. 1984. Structure and function of the ovary. In Reproductive biology of poultry (ed. Cunningham, F. J., Lake, P. E. and Hewitt, D.), pp. 15–27. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Hertelendy, F., Olson, D. M., Todd, H., Hammond, R. W., Toth, N. and Asboth, G. 1984. Rôle of prostaglandins in oviposition and ovulation. In Reproductive biology of poultry (ed. Cunningham, F. J., Lake, P. E. and Hewitt, D.), pp. 89–102. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Hocking, P. M. 1992. Genetic and environmental control of ovarian function in turkeys at sexual maturity. British Poultry Science 33: 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, J. D., Etches, R. J. and Guémené, D. 1990. Follicular control of oviposition in the hen. Poultry Science 69: 288–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahn, H., Paganelli, C. V. and Ar, A. 1975. Relation of avian egg weight to body weight. The Auk 92: 750–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raza, J. and Ewy, Z. 1982. The effects of ovarian steroids on the response of the uterus to neurohypophyseal hormones. Ada Physiologica Polonica 33: 249–255.Google Scholar
Shemesh, M., Shore, L., Lavi, S., Ailenberg, M., Bendheim, U., Totach, A. and Weisman, Y. 1984. The rôle of 17 β-ostradiol in the recovery from oviducal prolapse in layers. Poultry Science 63:1636–1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shemesh, M., Shore, L., Bendheim, U., Lavi, S. and Weisman, Y. 1982. Correlation between serum estrogen concentrations, light and prolapsed uterus in laying hens. In Advances in Pathology, vol. 1 (ed. Levy, E.), pp. 273–276. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Shore, L. S., Shemesh, M., Bendheim, U. and Totach, A. 1984. The effect of pharmacological doses of oestrogens on oviducal prolapse in the hen. Refuah Veterinarith 41: 34–37.Google Scholar
Thayer, R. H., Jaap, R. G. and Penquite, R. 1945. Fattening chickens by feeding oestrogens. Poultry Science 24:483–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, R. S. and Hoffman, E. 1942. Prolapse and “pickout” in diethylstilbestrol-treated cockerels. The Cornell Veterinarian 38: 89–92.Google Scholar