Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T08:24:57.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance of weanling pigs offered low or high lactose diets supplemented with avilamycin or inulin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

K. M. Pierce ,
J. J. Callan ,
P. McCarthy  and
J. V. O'Doherty
K. M. Pierce
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Lyons Research Farm, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
J. J. Callan
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Lyons Research Farm, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
P. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Volac Feed Ltd, Volac House, Church Street, Killeshandra, Co. Cavan, Ireland
J. V. O'Doherty*
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Lyons Research Farm, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

One hundred and eighty piglets (24 days old, 6·0 kg live weight) were used to investigate interactions between lactose, avilamycin and inulin on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in weaned piglets. The piglets were blocked on the basis of live weight and within each block assigned to one of six dietary treatments (six replicates (pens) per treatment). The piglets were offered diets containing either a low (175 g/kg) or high (295 g/kg) lactose levels with one of the following food additives (1) 0 supplementation (2) avilamycin (60 mg/kg) or (3) inulin (15 g/kg) in a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement. The starter diets were offered for 21 days and all diets contained chromium III oxide at 150 p. p. m. There was an interaction (P < 0·05) between lactose level and both avilamycin and inulin on average daily gain (ADG) during the starter period (days 0 to 21). The pigs receiving 295 g/kg lactose level had a higher overall ADG than pigs receiving 175 g/kg lactose level. However, there was no difference between 295 g/kg lactose and 175 g/kg lactose in ADG when the diets were supplemented with avilamycin or inulin. There was an interaction between lactose level and inulin in the apparent digestibility of gross energy (GE) and nitrogen (N) (P < 0·05). The inclusion of inulin with 175 g/kg lactose increased GE digestibility compared with the 175 g/kg lactose only diet. However, the inclusion of inulin with 295 g/kg lactose had no effect on GE digestibility. The inclusion of inulin with 295 g/kg lactose reduced N digestibility compared with the inclusion of inulin at 175 g/kg lactose. However, there was no difference in N digestibility between 175 and 295 g/kg lactose only diets. In conclusion, there was no benefit in terms of pig growth rate to supplementing diets high in lactose with either inulin or avilamycin. However, the inclusion of inulin improved the energy digestibility of diets low in lactose.

Keywords

avilamycininulinlactosepigs
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 80 , Issue 3 , June 2005 , pp. 313 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bach Knudsen, K. E. 2001. Development of antibiotic resistance and options to replace antimicrobials in animal diets. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 60: 291–299.Google ScholarPubMed
Buraczewski, S., Porter, J. W. G., Rolls, B. A. and Zebrowska, T. 1971. The course of digestion of different food proteins in the rat. 2. The effect of feeding carbohydrate with proteins. British Journal of Nutrition 25: 299–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canh, T. T., Verstegen, M. W. A., Aarnink, A. J. A. and Schrama, J. W. 1997. Influence of dietary factors on nitrogen partitioning and composition of urine and feces of fattening pigs. Journal of Animal Science 75: 700–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chesson, A. 1994. Probiotics and other intestinal mediators. In Principles of pig science (ed. Cole, D. J. A., Wiseman, J. and Varley, M. A.), pp. 197–214. Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Close, W. H. 1994. Feeding new genotypes: establishing amino acid/energy requirements. In Principles of pig science (ed. Cole, D. J. A., Wiseman, J. and Varley, M. A.), pp. 123–140. Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Cromwell, G. L. 2000. Antimicrobial and promicrobial agents. In Swine nutrition (ed. Lewis, A. J. and Southern, L. L.), pp. 401–426. CRC Press LLC, Corporate Blvd, Boca Raton, Florida.Google ScholarPubMed
De Lange, C. F. M. 2000. Characterisation of the non-starch polysaccharides. In Feed evaluation principles and practice (ed. Moughan, P. J., Verstegen, M. W. A. and Visser-Reyneveld, M. I.), pp. 77–92. Wageningen Pers, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
De Schrijver, R. 2001. Dietary oligosaccharides supplements: effects on digestion in pigs. In Digestive physiology of pigs (ed. Lindberg, J. E. and Ogle, B.), pp. 121–123. CABI Publishing, Oxon.Google Scholar
Drew, M. D., Van Kessel, A. G., Estrada, A. E., Ekpe, E. D. and Zijlstra, R. T. 2002. Effect of dietary cereal on intestinal bacterial populations in weaned pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 82: 607–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrada, A., Drew, M. D. and Van Kessel, A. 2001. Effect of the dietary supplementation of fructooligosaccharides and Bifidobacterium longum to early-weaned pigs on performance and fecal bacterial populations. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 81: 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkowski, J. F. and Aherne, F. X. 1984. Fumaric and citric acid as feed additives in starter pig nutrition. Journal of Animal Science 58: 935–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flickinger, E. A., Van Loo, J. and Fahey Jr, G. C. 2003. Nutritional responses to the presence of inulin and oligofructose in the diets of domesticated animals: a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 43: 19–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giesting, D. W. and Easter, R. A. 1991. Effect of protein source and fumaric acid supplementation on apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients by young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 69: 2497–2503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, G., Baidoo, S. K., Yang, Q., Golz, D. and Tungland, B. 2002. Evaluation of chicory inulin extracts as feed additives for earlyweaned pigs. Proceedings of the American Society of Animal Science 2002, p. 393 (abstr. ).Google Scholar
Houdijk, J. G. M., Bosch, M. W., Tamminga, S., Verstegen, M. W. A., Berenpas, E. K. and Knoop, H. 1999. Apparent ileal and totaltract nutrient digestion by pigs as affected by dietary nondigestible oligosaccharides. Journal of Animal Science 77: 148–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, II., Jewell, D. E., Benevenga, N. J. and Grummer, R. H. 1978. The fraction of dietary lactose available for fermentation in the caecum and colon of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 46: 1658–1665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krause, D. O., Easter, R. A. and Mackie, R. I. 1994. Fermentation of stachyose and raffinose by hind-gut bacteria of the weanling pig. Letters in Applied Microbiology 18: 349–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepine, A. J., Mahan, D. C. and Chung, Y. K. 1991. Growth performance of weanling pigs fed corn-soya bean meal diets with or without dried whey at various L-lysine HCl levels. Journal of Animal Science 69: 2026–2032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macfarlane, G. T., Hay, S., Macfarlane, S. and Gibson, G. R. 1990. Effect of different carbohydrates on growth, polysaccharidase and glycosidase production by Bacteroides ovatus, in batch and continuous culture. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 68: 179–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahan, D. C. 1992. Efficacy of dried whey and its lactalbumin and lactose components at two dietary lysine levels on postweaning pig performance and nitrogen balance. Journal of Animal Science 70: 2182–2187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1991. The feedingstuffs regulations 1991. Statutory instrument no. 2840, 9.76. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Murray, R. D., Ailabouni, A. H. and Powers, P. 1989. Fermentation of lactose in the caecum of newborn piglets in vivo (abstract). Gastroenterology 96: A355.Google Scholar
Nessmith Jr, W. B., Nelssen, J. L., Tokach, M. D., Goodband, R. D., Bergstrom, J. R., Dritz, S. S. and Richert, B. T. 1997. Evaluation of the interrelationships among lactose and protein sources in diets for segregated early-weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science 75: 3214–3221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Doherty, J. V., Nolan, C. S., Callan, J. J. and McCarthy, P. 2004. The interaction between lactofeed level and soya-bean meal on growth performance of weanling pigs. Animal Science 78: 419–427.Google Scholar
Owsley, W. F., Orr, D. E. and Tribble, L. F. 1986. Effects of nitrogen and energy source on nutrient digestibility in the young pig. Journal of Animal Science 63: 492–496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Partanen, K. H. and Mroz, Z. 1999. Organic acids for performance enhancement in pig diets. Nutrition Research Reviews 12: 117–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Partridge, G. G. and Gill, B. P. 1993. New approaches with pig weaner diets. In Recent developments in pig nutrition 3 (ed. Wiseman, J. and Garnsworthy, P. C.), pp. 205–237. Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Pierce, K. M., Callan, J. J. and O'Doherty, J. V. 2003. The interaction between lactose, skim milk and soya bean meal on growth performance of weanling pigs. In Perspectives in pig science (ed. Wiseman, J., Varley, M. A. and Kemp, B.), pp. 503–504. Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Pierce, K. M., Callan, J. J. and O'Doherty, J. V. 2004. The effect of lactose and inulin on intestinal morphology, microbiology and volatile fatty acids of the weanling pig. Journal of Animal Science 82: (suppl. 1) 25 (abstr. ).Google Scholar
Pluske, J. R. 2001. Morphological and functional changes in the small intestine of the newly-weaned pig. In Gut morphology of pigs ed. Piva, A., Bach Knudsen, K. E. and Lindberg, J. E.), pp. 1–27. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Pluske, J. R., Hampson, D. J. and Williams, I. H. 1997. Factors influencing the structure and function of the small intestine in the weaned pig: a review. Livestock Production Science 51: 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluske, J. R., Williams, I. H. and Aherne, F. X. 1996. Villous height and crypt depth in piglets in response to increases in the intake of cows' milk after weaning. Animal Science 62: 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roura, E., Homedes, J. and Klasing, K. C. 1992. Prevention of immunologic stress contributes to the growth promoting ability of dietary antibiotics in chicks. Journal of Nutrition 122: 2383–2390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soergel, K. H. 1994. Colonic fermentation: metabolic and clinical implications. Clinical Investigations 72: 742–748.Google ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1985. Statistical analysis systems. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Williams, B. A., Verstegen, M. W. A. and Tamminga, S. 2001 Fermentation in the large intestine of single-stomached animals and its relationship to animal health. Nutrition Research Reviews 14: 207–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, C. H., David, D. J. and Iismaa, O. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 59: 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar