Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:08:13.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of supplementation with protein, lipid and propionate on nutrient partitioning in roughage-fed lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. F. J. van Houtert  and
R. A. Leng
M. F. J. van Houtert
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Nutrition, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351, Australia
R. A. Leng
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Nutrition, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Eighty castrated male lambs were allocated to either an initial slaughter group (no. = 16) or one of eight treatment groups (no. = 8). Ammoniated barley straw was offered ad libitum. This was supplemented with sodium (Na) propionate (0 or 20 g/day), formaldehyde-treated casein, (protected casein, 0 or 50 g/day) and/or calcium (Ca) salts of long-chain fatty acids (Ca soap, 0 or 30 g/day), as a factorial design. Measurements were made of food intake, live-weight gain and wool growth, rumen fluid parameters and changes in body composition over a period of 155 days.

Food intake (g dry matter per kg live weight) was lower in the groups supplemented with Ca soap and Na propionate. Fleece-free live-weight gain was increased by supplementation with protected casein and Ca soap, but was not affected by Na propionate. Supplementation with protected casein increased wool yield. Adjusted means for water, protein and ash content of the body (adjusted to mean fleece/digesta-free body weight at slaughter of 27·1 kg) were affected significantly by the second-order interaction between the supplements. Adjusted body water and protein mass were lower when Na propionate was given alone or with Ca soap and protected casein. Fat mass tended to be higher under those conditions. Supplementation with Ca soap increased adjusted fat and gross energy contents and decreased adjusted protein and water mass. Supplementation with protected casein decreased total body fat and increased adjusted protein mass in the body. The partitioning of water, protein, fat, ash and energy between the carcass and non-carcass residues was affected to a small extent also. These results demonstrate interactive effects of the supplements used, on nutrient partitioning in lambs offered straw-based diets.

Keywords

body compositionlambslipidspropionatesproteinsupplements
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , June 1993 , pp. 341 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdul-Razzaq, H. A. and Bickerstaffe, R. 1989. The influence of rumen volatile fatty acids on protein metabolism in growing lambs. British Journal of Nutrition 62: 297–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agricultural Research Council. 1980. Nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G., Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. and Wainman, F. W. 1958. The utilization of the energy of two mixtures of steam volatile fatty acids by fattening sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 12: 177–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barry, T. N. 1981. Protein metabolism in growing lambs fed on fresh ryegrass (Lolium perenue)-c\over (Trifolium repens) pasture ad lib. 1. Protein and energy deposition in response to abomasal infusion of casein and methionine. British Journal of Nutrition 46: 521–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, D. E. 1984. Regulation of nutrient partitioning. In Herbivore nutrition in the suhtropics and tropics (ed. Gilchrist, F. M. C. and Mackie, R. I.), pp. 505–524. The Science Press, Craighall.Google Scholar
Black, J. L. 1974. Manipulation of body composition through nutrition. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 10: 211–218.Google Scholar
Butler-Hogg, B. W. and Cruickshank, G. J. 1989. The effects of environmental factors on growth and development. In Meat production and processing (ed. Purchas, R. W., Butler-Hogg, B. W. and Davies, A. S.), occasional publication 11, New Zealand Society of Animal Production, Wellington, pp. 87–101.Google Scholar
Cropper, M. R. 1989. Changing the body composition of sheep by feeding. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 49: 121–126.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. and Weston, R. H. 1971. Digestion by ruminant lambs of a diet containing formaldehyde-treated casein. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 22: 461–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houtert, M. F. J. van. 1987. Lipids and protein meal as feed supplements for sheep offered straw-based diets. M.Rur.Sci. Thesis, The University of New England.Google Scholar
Jenkins, T. C. and Thonney, M. L. 1988. Effect of propionate level in a volatile fatty acid salt mixture fed to lambs on weight gain, body composition and plasma metabolites. Journal of Animal Science 66: 1028–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, M. G. 1990. Energy and nitrogen intake, expenditure and retention at 20 degrees in growing fowl given diets with a wide range of energy and protein contents. British Journal of Nutrition 64: 625–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacRae, J. C. and Lobley, G. E. 1982. Some factors which influence thermal energy losses during the metabolism of ruminants. Livestock Production Science 9: 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manns, J. G., Boda, J. M. and Willes, R. F. 1967. Probable role of propionate and butyrate in control of insulin secretion in sheep. American Journal of Physiology 212: 756–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milligan, L. P. 1971. Energetic efficiency and metabolic transformations. Federation Proceedings 30: 1454–1458.Google ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R., Hovell, F. D. DeB. and Allen, D. M. 1966. Utilization of salts of volatile fatty acids by growing sheep. 2. Effect of stage of maturity and hormone implantation on the utilization of volatile fatty acid salts as sources of energy for growth and fattening. British Journal of Nutrition 20: 307–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R., McDonald, I., Fraser, C. and Corse, E. L. 1971. The nutrition of the early weaned lamb. III. The effect of ad libitum intake of diets varying in protein concentration on performance and on body composition at different liveweights. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77: 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and MacLeod, N. A. 1990. Dietary-induced thermogenesis and feed evaluation in ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 49: 227–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmquist, D. L. 1988. The feeding value of fats. In Feed science (ed. Ørskov, E. R.), pp. 293–311. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Perdok, H. B. and Leng, R. A. 1987. Hyperexcitability in cattle fed ammoniated roughages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 17: 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppi, D. P. 1990. Manipulation of nutrient supply to animals at pasture: opportunities and consequences. Proceedings of the fifth meeting Australasian Association of Animal Production, Taipei, vol. 1, pp. 40–79.Google Scholar
Reid, J. T. and Robb, J. 1971. Relationship of body composition to energy intake and energetic efficiency. Journal of Dairy Science 54: 553–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, D. W., Morgan, J. T. and Lewis, D. 1964. Protein and energy nutrition of the bacon pig. 1. The effect of varying protein and energy levels in the diet of growing pigs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 62: 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohr, K. and Daenicke, R. 1984. Nutritional effects on the distribution of live weight as gastrointestinal tract fill and tissue components in growing cattle. Journal of Animal Science 58: 753–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sano, H. and Terashima, Y. 1989. Dose response of insulin secretion to intraruminal and intravenous infusions of propionate in sheep. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2: 216–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urquhart, N. S. 1982. Adjustment in covariance when one factor affects the covariate. Biometrics 38: 651–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Usher, C. D., Green, C. J. and Smith, C. A. 1973. The rapid estimation of fat in various feeds using the Foss-let density apparatus. Food Technology 8: 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar