Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:30:13.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studying Congress through Time: A Comment on Joseph Cooper and David Brady, “Toward a Diachronic Analysis of Congress”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Nelson W. Polsby
Nelson W. Polsby*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Frontier Essay
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 75 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 1010 - 1012
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cooper, Joseph, and Brady, David (1981). “Toward a Diachronic Analysis of Congress.” American Political Science Review 75: 988–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budgor, Joel, Capell, Elizabeth A., Flanders, David A., Polsby, Nelson W., Westlye, Mark C. and Zaller, John (1981). “The 1896 Election and Congressional Modernization: An Appraisal of the Evidence.” Social Science History 5: 53–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwell, Elmer E. Jr., (1959). “Presidential News: The Expanding Public Image.” Journalism Quarterly 36: 275–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles O. (1968). “Minority Party and Policy Making in the House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 62: 481–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peabody, Robert L. (1966). The Ford-Halleck Minority Leadership Contest, 1965. Eagleton Institute Cases in Practical Politics. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. (1968). “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 62: 144–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. (1974). Political Promises. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. (1975). “Legislatures.” In Greenstein, F. I. and Polsby, N. W. (eds.). The Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 5: Governmental Institutions and Processes. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, pp. 257–319.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. (1978). “Coalition and Faction in American Politics: An Institutional View.” In Lipset, S. M. (ed.), Emerging Coalitions in American Politics. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies, pp. 103–23.Google Scholar
Price, H. Douglas (1975). “Congress and the Evolution of Legislative Professionalism.” In Ornstein, N. (ed.), Congress in Change. New York: Praeger, pp. 2–23.Google Scholar
Price, H. Douglas (1977). “Careers and Committees in the American Congress: The Problems of Structural Change.” In Aydelotte, W. O. (ed.), The History of Parliamentary Behavior. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, pp. 28–62.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Heifetz, Joan (1965). “Safe Seats, Seniority and Power in Congress.” American Political Science Review 59: 337–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.