Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:40:20.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Capitol Mobility: Madisonian Representation and the Location and Relocation of Capitals in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2013

ERIK J. ENGSTROM ,
JESSE R. HAMMOND  and
JOHN T. SCOTT
ERIK J. ENGSTROM*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
JESSE R. HAMMOND*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
JOHN T. SCOTT*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
*
Erik J. Engstrom is Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95615 ([email protected]).
Jesse R. Hammond is a PhD candidate in the Department of Political Science, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95615 ([email protected]).
John T. Scott is Professor in the Department of Political Science, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95615 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The location of a government's capital can profoundly influence the nature and quality of political representation. Yet scholars know very little about what drives the siting of political capitals. In this article, we examine the location and relocation of political capitals in the United States, including the choice of Washington, DC, as the nation's capital and the location and relocation of capitals in the 48 contiguous American states. We argue that the location of capitals in the United States followed a systematic pattern in accord with the theory of representative government developed in the new nation, especially as articulated by Madison. Based on an empirical analysis of historical census and political boundaries data from 1790 to the present, we find that decision makers consistently tended to locate—and especially relocate—the seat of government as near as possible to the population centroid of the relevant political jurisdiction, consistent with the principle of equal representation of citizens. Our analysis contributes to the study of institutional design and change, especially in the area of American political development, as well as to a burgeoning literature on the effects of geographical factors on political outcomes.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 107 , Issue 2 , May 2013 , pp. 225 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickford, Charlene Bangs, Bowling, Kenneth R., and Veit, Helen E., eds. 1992. Debates in the House of Representatives; First Session: June-September 1789. Vol. 11 of the Documentary History of the First Federal Congress of the United States of America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bowling, Kenneth R. 1971. “Dinner at Jefferson's: A Note on Jacob E. Cooke's ‘The Compromise of 1790.’” William and Mary Quarterly 28 (4): 629–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowling, Kenneth R. 1991. The Creation of Washington, D.C.: The Idea and Location of the American Capital. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.Google Scholar
Campante, Felipe R., and Do, Quoc-Anh. 2010. “A Centered Index of Spatial Concentration: Expected Influence Approach and Application to Population and Capital Cities.” Working Paper. Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.Google Scholar
Campante, Felipe R., and Quoc-Anh, Do. 2012. “Isolated Capital Cities, Accountability, and Corruption: Evidence from U.S. States.” Working Paper. Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, Joshua D., and Meirowitz, Adam. 2004. “Testing Explanations of Strategic Voting in Legislatures: A Reexamination of the Compromise of 1790.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 675–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Jacob. 1970. “The Compromise of 1790.” William and Mary Quarterly 27: 523–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2001. “The Institutional Determinants of Economic Policy Outcomes.” In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, eds. Haggard, Stephen and McCubbins, Mathew D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 21–63.Google Scholar
Ellis, Joseph. 2000. Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Elkins, Stanley, and McKitrick, Eric. 1995. The Age of Federalism: The Early American Republic, 1788–1800. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrand, Max, ed. 1966. The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. 4 vols. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, Alan. 1991. “Impartial Representation and the Extended Republic: Towards a Comprehensive and Balanced Reading of the Tenth Federalist Paper .” History of Political Thought 12 (Summer): 263–304.Google Scholar
Gibson, Alan. 2012. “Madison's ‘Great Desideratum’: Impartial Administration and the Extended Republic.” American Political Thought 1:2 (Fall): 181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glassner, Martin Ira, and de Blij, Harm J.. 1989. Systematic Political Geography. 4th ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter. 1993. “The Changing Role of Capital Cities: Six Types of Capital City.” In Capital Cities/Les Capitales: Perspectives Internationales/International Perspectives, eds. Taylor, John, Lengellé, Jean G., and Andrew, Caroline. Ottawa: Carleton University Press, 70–83.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. 1961. The Federalist Papers. Ed. Rossiter, Clinton. New York: New American Library.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Jeffrey. 2000. States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hoadley, John F. 1986. Origins of American Political Parties, 1789–1803. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Hugo, Graeme, and Harris, Kevin. 2011. Population Distribution Effects of Migration in Australia. Report prepared for the Australian Government, Department of Immigration and Citizenship. http://www.immi.gov.au/media/publications/research/migration-in-australia/.Google Scholar
Keyssar, Alexander. 2000. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 2003. “Vote Trading in the First Federal Congress? James Madison and the Compromise of 1790.” In James Madison: The Theory and Practice of Republican Government, ed. Kernell, Samuel. Stanford: Stanford University Press. pp. 264–301.Google Scholar
Kromkowski, Charles A. 2002. Recreating the American Republic: Rules of Apportionment, Constitutional Change, and American Political Development, 1700–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumler, Mark P., and Goodchild, Michael F.. 1992. “The Population Center of Canada—Just North of Toronto?” In Geographical Snapshots of North America, ed. Janelle, D.G.. New York: Guilford Press, 275–79.Google Scholar
Leibiger, Stuart. 1999. Founding Friendship: George Washington, James Madison, and the Creation of the American Republic. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Lutz, Donald S. 1988. The Origins of American Constitutionalism. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Madison, James. 1962–77. The Papers of James Madison: Congressional Series. 17 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maier, Pauline. 2010. Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787–1788. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, Thomas. [1791] 1995. The Rights of Man . In The Rights of Man, Common Sense, and Other Political Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Potts, Deborah. 1985. “Capital Relocation in Africa: The Case of Lilongwe in Malawe.” Geographical Journal 151 (2): 182–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, Amos. 1993. “On the Nature of Capitals and Their Physical Expression.” In Capital Cities/Les Capitales: Perspectives Internationales/International Perspectives, eds. Taylor, John, Lengellé, Jean G., and Andrew, Caroline. Ottawa: Carleton University Press, 31–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2005. The Concept of Constituency: Political Representation, Democratic Legitimacy, and Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatz, Edward. 2004. “What Capital Cities Say about State and Nation Building.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 9: 111–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing like A State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stasavage, David. 2010. “When Distance Mattered: Geographic Scale and the Development of European Representative Assemblies.” American Political Science Review 104 (4): 625–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Mark. 2008. How the States Got Their Shapes. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books.Google Scholar
Stewart, Charles III. 2012. Analyzing Congress. 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1990. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon S. 1969. The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Young, James Sterling. 1966. The Washington Community, 1800–1828. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Zagarri, Rosemarie. 1987. The Politics of Size: Representation in the United States, 1776–1850. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zagarri, Rosemarie. 1988. “Representation and the Removal of State Capitals, 1776–1812.” Journal of American History 74 (4): 1239–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.