We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
QSSR have wider applications and can also be applied to theories other than QCD as it is based on first principles of analyticity and duality.
Some other applications in QCD
Some other applications of QSSR have been already reviewed in details in the book [3], which we list below:
Baryons at large Nc.
String tension from Wilson loops.
Relation between lattice correlators and chiral symmetry breaking in the continuum limit.
Two-dimensional QCD.
Electroweak models with dynamic symmetry breaking
QSSR has been also extended in order to give dynamic constraints on fermions and W, Z bosons assumed to be bound states of preons (haplons) where the structures may manifest at the TeV scale. The analysis has been done by assuming that at that scale, one can have a strong interaction theory of preons that is closely analogous to QCD describing the electroweak interactions, with the exception that one has to be careful on the chirality of the theories:
In [868] and [869], (reviewed in [870]), QSSR (Laplace and FESR) have been used in order to test the consistency of the compositeness assumption for the W and Z bosons and its spin zero partners, in the haplon model proposed by Fritzsch and Mandelbaum [871], leading to a duality constraint between the boson masses and couplings with the continuum threshold (compositeness scale).
After Einstein's identification of the invariance group of space and time in 1905, symmetry principles received an enthusiastic welcome in physics, with the hope that these principles could express the simplicity of nature in its deepest level. Since 1927 [99,100], it has been recognized that Quantum ElectroDynamics (QED) has a local symmetry under the transformations in which the electron field has a phase change that can vary point to point in space–time, and the electromagnetic vector potential undergoes a corresponding transformation. This kind of transformation is called a U(1) gauge symmetry due to the fact that a simple phase change can be thought as a multiplication by a 1 × 1 unitary matrix. Largely motivated by the challenge of giving a field-theoretical framework to the concept of isospin invariance, Yang and Mills [101] in 1954 extended the idea of QED to the SU(2) group of symmetry. However, it appears here that the symmetry would have to be approximate because gauge invariance requires massless vector bosons like the photon, and it seems obvious that strong interactions of pions were not mediated by massless but by the massive ρ mesons. In 1961, there was the idea of dynamic breaking, i.e., the Hamiltonian and commutation relations of a quantum theory could possess an exact symmetry and the symmetry of the Hamiltonian might not turn to be a symmetry of the vacuum.