The Landau Paradigm

The usual paradigm to describe phase transitions is that of Landau. It is based on an expansion of a free energy functional or an action in terms of an order parameter. Close to the phase transition the order parameter is small, and only terms dictated by symmetry are allowed in this expansion. Associated with this paradigm are many important ideas, such as that of broken symmetry and Goldstone modes. The extension of this paradigm to include quantum phase transitions certainly brought new ideas and progress, as we have seen in this book: the inextricability between the dynamics and static properties, the modified hyperscaling relation with the notion of an effective dimensionality, the role of the uncertainty principle linking energy and temporal fluctuations and so on. The underlying principle here is always that of symmetry. However, as we will see in this chapter, this paradigm is not sufficient to describe certain classes of phenomena that do not involve symmetry changes but are nonetheless still associated with diverging lengths, singularities and critical exponents: features that are clearly related to critical phenomena and phase transitions. We have already met similar behaviour when studying density-driven or Lifshitz transitions. We will see in this chapter that these transitions are much more common and interesting that initially thought. The keyword here is topology, which contains principles and constraints that protect quasi-particle excitations and are still more powerful than those of symmetry.

Topological Quantum Phase Transitions

We will refer to topological quantum phase transitions (TQPT) as those that separate two phases where at least one of them is topologically non-trivial, as characterised by some topological parameter like a winding number or a Berry phase. In some cases these transitions either give rise to singularities in a thermodynamic quantity or are accompanied by a diverging length. However, differently from Landau-type phase transitions they are not necessarily associated with a symmetry change. Also there is no identifiable order parameter to distinguish between the different phases. Topological quantities are not useful to play the role of an order parameter. They are in general discontinuous at topological transitions and this does not necessarily reflect the nature of the transition. On the other hand, we will show that the renormalisation group is a useful tool to describe TQPT.

Introduction

The real space renormalisation group has a wide application in the study of classical critical phenomena. For quantum systems, several versions of the real space renormalisation group have been proposed (Jullien, 1981; Pfeuty et al., 1982; dos Santos, 1982). The real space RG is the most direct way of implementing the scaling ideas presented in Chapter 1. The operation of elimination of degrees of freedom as the system is reduced to blocks of smaller sizes under a change of length scale is directly and intuitively represented as mathematical equations. In particular, the block method has been used to study different problems of strongly correlated systems (Pfeuty et al., 1982) and spin chains (White, 1992, 1993) with different degrees of sophistication. We show here in detail a simple form of this technique applied to the case of the one-dimensional Ising model in a transverse field. The purpose is to illustrate the ideas introduced earlier in Chapter 1 with a concrete example where a quantum critical point is associated with an unstable fixed point. Also, we show how the stable attractors or fixed points can characterise the different phases and how the critical exponents can be obtained. Although the actual values for the quantum critical point and critical exponents that we obtain using a small block are not exact, a procedure is outlined which can be used to improve these results. In this sense, the block method presented here represents a controlled approximation, which can be systematically improved to yield in the limit of very large blocks essentially the correct results. When compared to the k-space version of the RG (to be presented in the next two chapters), the real space version turns out to be in general more difficult to control, in the sense of producing a systematic improvement of the results. On the other hand, this method yields without much effort the attractive fixed points of the different phases, allowing for their characterisation. This turns out to be useful since the nature of the phase transition, whether first or second order, can be determined by exponents calculated in the attractor of this phase (Nienhuis and Naunberg, 1975).

Introduction

In this chapter we examine a special type of quantum critical point related to superconducting zero-temperature instabilities in many-body systems. We consider the case where the superconductor order parameter is inhomogeneous and characterised by a wave vector qC. Inhomogeneous ground states also appear in other systems like magnetic materials, in the form of spin-density waves or helicoidal ground states, in charge density wave systems and in excitonic insulators. They share the existence of a characteristic wave vector that determines the spatial modulation of the order parameter. For superconductors, we consider two cases.

First, the problem, treated independently by Fulde and Ferrell (1964)and Larkin and Ovchinnikov (1965), of an s-wave, singlet superconductor in a homogeneous external magnetic field in the absence of vortices or orbital effects. The predicted ground state is generally known as the FFLO superconductor and is described by an order parameter that oscillates in space like ΔeiqC·r. It arises from the competition between the pairing energy of electrons with opposite spins and the Zeemann energy due to the external magnetic field that forces the alignment of the spins. For sufficiently large magnetic fields the Zeemann energy always wins and the ground state of the system is a spin-polarised, normal fermionic gas. However, as the magnetic field decreases, there is a quantum phase transition to a modulated superconducting state (Samokhin and Marénko, 2006; Caldas and Continentino, 2012) whose nature we identify. We also determine the universality class of this superconducting quantum phase transition. The characteristic wave vector qC of the resulting modulated superconducting phase is related to the difference between the Fermi wave vectors of the antiparallel spin bands that in turn is proportional to the magnetic field. A related question we also investigate is the fate of the uniform superconductor when the magnetic field is increased in the absence of orbital effects. We show that these two extreme approaches, increasing the field in the homogeneous superconductor and decreasing the field starting from the polarised metal do not merge smoothly into one another.

Conductivity and Charge Stiffness

In this chapter, we will consider initially metal–insulator (MI) transitions which occur in pure systems without disorder. In the final section we consider a superfluid–insulator transition induced by some special type of disorder. We will show that the quantities which characterise the phase transitions in both problems obey similar scaling laws and are governed by similar exponents.

Differently from the magnetic transitions treated before metal–insulator (MI) transitions have no obvious order parameter to distinguish the metallic from the insulating phase. This precludes a power expansion of the free energy in terms of a small quantity as for magnetic phase transitions. In spite of that, the concepts of phase transitions and critical phenomena turn out to be very useful to describe metal–insulator transitions. In case this problem is approached using the renormalisation group, the localisation transition is associated with an unstable fixed point and the flow of the RG equations to the different attractors is sufficient to distinguish the nature of the phases. Then, in general, we can associate a set of critical exponents with the MI transitions. Besides, these exponents are not independent but obey scaling relations. Since we are concerned with zero temperature instabilities, the quantum hyperscaling law, Eq. 1.18, plays a crucial role in this problem.

We will distinguish here two different types of metal–insulator transitions. Those due to a competition between parameters of the relevant Hamiltonian and metal–insulator transitions arising by varying the number of electrons or chemical potential. An example of the former is the Mott transition due to the competition between kinetic energy and the local Coulomb repulsion as described by the half-filled band Hubbard model. The latter will be referred as density-driven metal– insulator transitions in analogy with the superfluid–insulator transition in bosonic systems with varying particle number (Fisher et al., 1989). These two types of transitions may occur in the same system or Hamiltonian. They in general belong to different universality classes and consequently have different critical exponents.

Quantum Phase Transitions

Quantum phase transitions, in contrast to temperature-driven critical phenomena, occur due to a competition between different parameters describing the basic interactions of the system. Their specific feature is the quantum character of the critical fluctuations. This implies, through the uncertainty principle, that energy fluctuations and time are coupled. Then at zero temperature time plays a crucial and fundamental role, the static properties being entangled with the dynamics (Continentino, 1994a; Sondhi et al., 1997; Sachdev, 1999). In this book we are mainly interested in quantum phase transitions that occur in electronic many-body systems and how scaling concepts can be useful to understand their properties close to these transitions (Continentino, 1994a). Even though a similar approach has been used in the case of interacting bosons (Fisher et al., 1989) the fermionic problem has its own idiosyncrasies and difficulties. For example, there is no natural order parameter associated with the localisation transition in the electronic case, while bosons at zero temperature are either localised or superfluid so that the superfluid order parameter can be used to distinguish between both phases.

If the results of the study of quantum phase transitions were restricted to zero temperature, this would be an interesting but purely academic area of research. What is really exciting about this subject is the effect of quantum critical points (QCP) in the finite temperature phase diagram of actual physical systems, even far away from the QCP (Freitas, 2015). As we will show, there is a special line in this phase diagram, the quantum critical trajectory, where the temperature dependence of the thermodynamic and transport properties is governed by the quantum critical exponents, i.e. those associated with the QCP. This and the observed crossover effects induced by temperature in the non-critical side of the phase diagram of a material with a QCP are sufficient to make the study of quantum phase transitions an inevitable subject.

We start this chapter by introducing the scaling theory of quantum critical phenomena, since scaling concepts are used throughout this book.

Liquid crystals (LCs) are unique functional soft materials which combine both order and mobility on a molecular, supramolecular and macroscopic level. Hierarchical self-assembly in LCs offers a powerful strategy for producing nanostructured mesophases. Molecular shape, microsegregation of incompatible parts, specific molecular interaction, self-assembly and self-organization are important factors that drive the formation of various LC phases. LCs are accepted as the fourth state of matter after solid, liquid and gas. LCs form a state of matter intermediate between the solid and the liquid state. For this reason, they are referred to as intermediate phases or mesophases. This is a true thermodynamic stable state of matter. The constituents of the mesophase are called mesogens. Since the discovery of LCs in 1888 by F. Reinitzer, it was assumed that LC molecules are mainly composed of mesogenic core attached to which are one or more alkyl chains. However, during 1980s a new class of LCs attracted particular attention acknowledged as the LC dimers. An LC dimer is composed of molecules containing two mesogenic units linked via a flexible alkyl spacer, most commonly an alkyl chain. Thus, LC dimers contravened the accepted structure–property relationships for low molar mass mesogens by consisting of molecules having a highly flexible core rather than a semirigid central unit. In these respect, therefore, these molecules actually represented an inversion of the conventional molecular design for low molar mass mesogens. Although this class of compounds has been discovered by Vorlander long back in 1927, these dimers did not achieve considerable attention until their rediscovery by Griffin and Britt in 1980s. Subsequently, several classes of dimeric LC compounds have been prepared and studied extensively.

As of now, no book exists on this topic. However, a chapter on LC dimers can be seen in many LC-related books. While a number of books are available on LCs, no exclusive book describing the basic design principles, transitional properties, device fabrication and applications of dimeric LCs is available. Researchers working in the field of LC dimers and device fabrication need to have an upto- date source of reference material to establish a solid foundation of understanding. It is extremely important that students and researchers in this field have ready access to what is known and what has already been accomplished in the field. This book contains all the recent literature up to 2015 and covers the physics, chemistry, electronics, and materials-related properties.