We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Implementation of symmetries can significantly enhance the expression power of DMRG and effectively allow us to retain more basis states in the DMRG calculation. This chapter discusses the skills of imposing symmetries, including spin reflection, spatial reflection, continuous U(1) or other symmetries with additive quantum numbers, and non-Abelian SU(2) symmetry, in a DMRG calculation.
This chapter introduces the quantum transfer matrix renormalization group (QTMRG). It is a method of studying the thermodynamic and correlation functions of one-dimensional quantum lattice models. The RG transformation matrices are determined using the criteria presented in the preceding chapter and used to update the transfer matrix and other physical quantities. The spin-1/2 and spin-1 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg models are used to demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the method.
This chapter introduces the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) in real space. The infinite and finite lattice algorithms of DMRG, and the approaches for targeting more than one eigenstate and for implementing DMRG in two dimensions by mapping a two-dimensional lattice onto a one-dimensional one, are discussed. The one-dimensional antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model of both integer and half-integer spins is used to demonstrate the method.
This chapter introduces two kinds of RG methods for solving the leading eigenvalue and eigenvectors of a transfer matrix: TMRG (transfer matrix renormalization group) and CTMRG (corner transfer matrix renormalization group). These methods are developed to study the thermodynamic properties of two-dimensional classical statistical models. Furthermore, in the framework of MPS, the fixed-point equations of these methods are derived, and the steps for efficiently solving these equations are outlined.
This chapter reformulates QTMRG using the language of MPS and introduces the concept of bicanonical MPS and the method of biorthogonalization. The fixed-point equations for determining the local tensors of MPS in a translation-invariant system of one or more than one site in a unit cell are derived. The steps for solving these equations in the scheme of biorthonormalization are discussed.
This chapter starts with an introductory survey on the physical background and historical events that lead to the emergence of the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) and its tensor network generalization. We then briefly overview the major progress on the renormalization group methods of tensor networks and their applications in the past three decades. The tensor network renormalization was initially developed to solve quantum many-body problems, but its application field has grown constantly. It has now become an irreplaceable tool for investigating strongly correlated problems, statistical physics, quantum information, quantum chemistry, and artificial intelligence.
This chapter introduces the tensor network representation of physical operators, especially the matrix product representation of model Hamiltonians, called the matrix product operators (MPO), and the quantum transfer matrix representation of partition functions with different boundary conditions or with an impurity. The leading eigenvalue and eigenvectors of the quantum transfer matrix determine all thermodynamic quantities. It allows us to investigate thermodynamics without solving the full energy spectra of the Hamiltonian.
This chapter introduces the tensor network ansatz for a quantum state whose entanglement entropy obeys the so-called area law with or without logarithmic corrections. This ansatz represents a quantum many-body wave function by a network product of local tensors defined on the lattice sites and treats all tensor elements as variational parameters. It includes, for example, one-dimensional matrix product states (MPS) and two-dimensional projected entangled pair states (PEPS) or projected entangled simplex states (PESS). A typical example is the spin-1 AKLT chain, whose ground state can be exactly represented as an MPS. If a logarithmic correction to the entanglement area law emerges, a tensor network state termed the multi-scale entanglement renormalization ansatz (MERA) describes the entanglement structure of the ground state more accurately in one dimension.
This chapter presents the methods of calculating dynamical correlation functions, including the continued-fraction expansion, Lanczos-DMRG, Lanczos-MPS, Chebyshev-MPS, correction vector, conjugate gradient, and dynamical DMRG methods. In the practical application of the Lanczos-MPS or Chebyshev-MPS method, a reorthogonalization scheme is introduced to optimize all the MPS generated with these methods. As an example of application, we investigate the dynamical spectra of the spin-1/2 Heisenberg model using the Chebyshev-MPS method.
This chapter discusses the methods of solving PEPS or other two-dimensional tensor network states, including variational optimization and the annealing simulation. The variation optimization determines the local terms by minimizing the ground-state energy. The annealing simulation takes the full or simple update strategy to filter out the ground state through the imaginary time evolution. The nonlinear effect arises in evaluating the derivative of uniform PEPS and is avoided by utilizing automatic differentiation. Both variational optimization and the annealing simulation involve a contraction of double-layer tensor network states. This contraction is the primary technical barrier in the study of PEPS. A nested tensor network approach is introduced to combat this difficulty.
This chapter introduces the method for solving time-dependent problems of quantum many-body systems. It includes the pace-keeping DMRG, time-evolving block decimation (TEBD), adaptive time-dependent DMRG, and folded transfer matrix methods. The pace-keeping DMRG, which solves the time-dependent Schrodinger equation, works independently of the dimensionality, nor the model Hamiltonian, with or without impurities. The time-evolving block decimation (TEBD) is more efficient than the pace-keeping DMRG if a one-dimensional Hamiltonian with the nearest-neighboring interactions is studied. The adaptive time-dependent DMRG provides an efficient scheme to implement TEBD with the skill of DMRG. On the other hand, the folded transfer matrix method handles the transfer matrix like TMRG by folding the transfer matrix so that the entanglement entropy along the positive and negative time evolution directions can partially cancel each other. This folding scheme significantly extends the time scale within which a time-dependent problem can be reliably investigated.
Several numerical methods used in the study of tensor network renormalization are introduced, including the power, Lanczos, conjugate gradient, Arnoldi methods, and quantum Monte Carlo simulation.
The tangent space of a tensor network state is a manifold that parameterizes the variational trajectory of local tensors. It leads to a framework to accommodate the time-dependent variational principle (TDVP), which unifies stationary and time-dependent methods for dealing with tensor networks. It also offers an ideal platform for investigating elementary excitations, including nontrivial topological excitations, in a quantum many-body system under the single-mode approximation. This chapter introduces the tangent-space approaches in the variational determination of MPS and PEPS, starting with a general discussion on the properties of the tangent vectors of uniform MPS. It then exemplifies TDVP by applying it to optimize the ground state MPS. Finally, the methods for calculating the excitation spectra in both one and two dimensions are explored and applied to the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model on the square lattice.
This chapter discusses the properties of tree tensor network states and the methods for evaluating the ground state and thermodynamic properties of quantum lattice models on a Bethe lattice or, more generally, a Husimi lattice. It starts with a brief discussion of the canonical form of a tree tensor network state. Then, a canonicalization scheme is proposed. To calculate the ground state through the imaginary time evolution, the full and simple update methods are introduced to renormalize the local tensors. Finally, as the correlation length of a quantum system is finite even at a critical point, an accurate and efficient method is described to compute the thermodynamic quantities of quantum lattice models on the Bethe lattice.
This chapter discusses the properties of matrix product state (MPS). It starts with a simple proof that the wave function generated by DMRG is an MPS. Then three different but equivalent canonical forms or representations of MPS are introduced. An MPS generally has redundant gauge degrees of freedom on each bond linking two neighboring local tensors. One can convert it into a canonical form by taking a canonical transformation to remove the gauge redundancy in the local tensors. Finally, the implementation of symmetries, including both the U(1) and SU(2) symmetries, is discussed.
This chapter constructs the MPS representation of a quantum state in the continuous limit. It starts with an MPS representation for the corresponding state in a discretized lattice system. Then the limit of the discretized lattice constant going to zero is taken to obtain its continuous presentation. The formulas for determining the expectation values are also derived. Finally, we discuss the scheme of canonicalization and the method for optimizing the local tensors of the continuous MPS.
This chapter discusses the properties of infinite MPS and their associated transfer matrices. The formulas for determining the expectation values of physical observables are derived and expressed using the leading eigenvectors of the transfer matrix. The concept of the string order parameter is introduced and exemplified with the AKLT state, followed by a statement on the condition for the existence of string order. Furthermore, the procedure of canonicalizing an infinite MPS with one or more than one site in a unit cell is discussed.